-
Coping with the Dunkelflaute: Power system implications of variable renewable energy droughts in Europe
Authors:
Martin Kittel,
Alexander Roth,
Wolf-Peter Schill
Abstract:
Coping with prolonged periods of low availability of wind and solar power, also referred to as "Dunkelflaute", emerges as a key challenge for realizing a decarbonized European energy system fully based on renewable energy sources. Here we investigate the role of long-duration electricity storage and geographical balancing in dealing with such variable renewable energy droughts. To this end, we com…
▽ More
Coping with prolonged periods of low availability of wind and solar power, also referred to as "Dunkelflaute", emerges as a key challenge for realizing a decarbonized European energy system fully based on renewable energy sources. Here we investigate the role of long-duration electricity storage and geographical balancing in dealing with such variable renewable energy droughts. To this end, we combine renewable availability time series analysis and power sector modeling, using 36 historical weather years. We find that extreme drought events define long-duration storage operation and investment. The most extreme event in Europe occurred in the winter of 1996/97. Assuming policy-relevant interconnection, long-duration storage of 351 TWh or 7% of yearly electricity demand is required to deal with this event. As it affects many countries simultaneously, a storage capacity of 159 TWh or 3% of yearly electricity demand remains required even in the extreme case of unconstrained geographical balancing. Before and during Dunkelflaute events, we find complex interactions of long-duration storage with other flexibility options. Sensitivity analyses illustrate that firm zero-emission generation technologies would only moderately reduce long-duration storage needs. Thus, policymakers and system planners should prepare for a rapid expansion of long-duration storage capacity to safeguard the renewable energy transition in Europe. We further argue that using multiple weather years that include pronounced renewable energy droughts is required for weather-resilient energy system modeling.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2025; v1 submitted 26 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Quantifying the Dunkelflaute: An analysis of variable renewable energy droughts in Europe
Authors:
Martin Kittel,
Wolf-Peter Schill
Abstract:
Variable renewable energy droughts, also referred to as "Dunkelflaute", emerge as a challenge for realizing climate-neutral energy systems based on variable wind and solar power. Using data on 38 historic weather years and an advanced identification method, we characterize European drought events for on- and offshore wind power, solar photovoltaics, and policy-relevant renewable technology portfol…
▽ More
Variable renewable energy droughts, also referred to as "Dunkelflaute", emerge as a challenge for realizing climate-neutral energy systems based on variable wind and solar power. Using data on 38 historic weather years and an advanced identification method, we characterize European drought events for on- and offshore wind power, solar photovoltaics, and policy-relevant renewable technology portfolios. We show that drought characteristics heavily depend on the chosen threshold. Using single thresholds, as common in the literature, is thus not advisable. Applying a multi-threshold framework, we quantify how the complementarity of wind and solar power temporally and spatially alleviates drought frequency, duration, and severity within (portfolio effect) and across countries (balancing effect). We further identify the most extreme droughts and show how these drive major discharging periods of long-duration storage in a fully renewable European energy system. Such events comprise sequences of shorter, contiguous droughts of varying severity. In a perfectly interconnected Europe, the most extreme drought event occurred in winter 1996/97 and lasted 55~days. Yet, the average renewable portfolio availability during this event was still 47% of its long-run mean. As extreme droughts may span across the turn of years, single calendar year planning horizons are not suitable for modeling weather-resilient future energy scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Overcoming the disconnect between energy system and climate modeling
Authors:
Michael T. Craig,
Jan Wohland,
Laurens P. Stoop,
Alexander Kies,
Bryn Pickering,
Hannah C. Bloomfield,
Jethro Browell,
Matteo De Felice,
Chris J. Dent,
Adrien Deroubaix,
Felix Frischmuth,
Paula L. M. Gonzalez,
Aleksander Grochowicz,
Katharina Gruber,
Philipp Härtel,
Martin Kittel,
Leander Kotzur,
Inga Labuhn,
Julie K. Lundquist,
Noah Pflugradt,
Karin van der Wiel,
Marianne Zeyringer,
David J. Brayshaw
Abstract:
Energy system models underpin decisions by energy system planners and operators. Energy system modelling faces a transformation: accounting for changing meteorological conditions imposed by climate change. To enable that transformation, a community of practice in energy-climate modelling has started to form that aims to better integrate energy system models with weather and climate models. Here, w…
▽ More
Energy system models underpin decisions by energy system planners and operators. Energy system modelling faces a transformation: accounting for changing meteorological conditions imposed by climate change. To enable that transformation, a community of practice in energy-climate modelling has started to form that aims to better integrate energy system models with weather and climate models. Here, we evaluate the disconnects between the energy system and climate modelling communities, then lay out a research agenda to bridge those disconnects. In the near-term, we propose interdisciplinary activities for expediting uptake of future climate data in energy system modelling. In the long-term, we propose a transdisciplinary approach to enable development of (1) energy-system-tailored climate datasets for historical and future meteorological conditions and (2) energy system models that can effectively leverage those datasets. This agenda increases the odds of meeting ambitious climate mitigation goals by systematically capturing and mitigating climate risk in energy sector decision making.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2023; v1 submitted 31 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Reducing energy system model distortions from unintended storage cycling through variable costs
Authors:
Maximilian Parzen,
Martin Kittel,
Daniel Friedrich,
Aristides Kiprakis
Abstract:
Energy model distortions may unknowingly appear and represent unrealistic and non-physical effects that can mislead optimal model decisions. A prominent misleading effect is unintended storage cycling that was observed in previous literature by simultaneous charging and discharging of the same storage in 12 of 18 energy models. Especially for popular net-zero energy model scenarios, unintended sto…
▽ More
Energy model distortions may unknowingly appear and represent unrealistic and non-physical effects that can mislead optimal model decisions. A prominent misleading effect is unintended storage cycling that was observed in previous literature by simultaneous charging and discharging of the same storage in 12 of 18 energy models. Especially for popular net-zero energy model scenarios, unintended storage cycling can cause high distortions and, hence, urges for its removal. Methods to remove such misleading effects exist, but are not computational efficient and sometimes not effective such as MILP formulations. Other techniques are successful, but only if renewable energy target constraints exist. This paper explores how to eradicate unintended storage cycling for models without renewable target constraints by correctly setting variable costs of relevant system components. We find through 124 simulations that determining appropriate levels of variable costs depends on the solver accuracy used for the optimization. If set too loose, the solver prevents the removal of unintended storage cycling. We further find that reliable data for variable costs in energy modelling needs to be improved and provide a list of recommended model inputs as well as a minimum variable cost threshold that can significantly reduce the magnitude and likeliness of unintended storage cycling. Finally, our results suggest that variable cost additives may remove other known unintended energy cycling effects, such as unintended line cycling or sector cycling.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2022; v1 submitted 19 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
DIETERpy: a Python framework for The Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables
Authors:
Carlos Gaete-Morales,
Martin Kittel,
Alexander Roth,
Wolf-Peter Schill
Abstract:
DIETER is an open-source power sector model designed to analyze future settings with very high shares of variable renewable energy sources. It minimizes overall system costs, including fixed and variable costs of various generation, flexibility and sector coupling options. Here we introduce DIETERpy that builds on the existing model version, written in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS),…
▽ More
DIETER is an open-source power sector model designed to analyze future settings with very high shares of variable renewable energy sources. It minimizes overall system costs, including fixed and variable costs of various generation, flexibility and sector coupling options. Here we introduce DIETERpy that builds on the existing model version, written in the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS), and enhances it with a Python framework. This combines the flexibility of Python regarding pre- and post-processing of data with a straightforward algebraic formulation in GAMS and the use of efficient solvers. DIETERpy also offers a browser-based graphical user interface. The new framework is designed to be easily accessible as it enables users to run the model, alter its configuration, and define numerous scenarios without a deeper knowledge of GAMS. Code, data, and manuals are available in public repositories under permissive licenses for transparency and reproducibility.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021; v1 submitted 2 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
