-
The Anatomy of Coronary Risk: How Artery Geometry Shapes Coronary Artery Disease through Blood Flow Haemodynamics -- Latest Methods, Insights and Clinical Implications
Authors:
C. Shen,
M. Zhang,
H. Keramati,
S. Zhang,
R. Gharleghi,
J. J. Wentzel,
M. O. Khan,
U. Morbiducci,
A. Qayyum,
S. A. Niederer,
S. Samant,
Y. S. Chatzizisis,
D. Almeida,
Tsung-Ying Tsai,
P. Serruys,
S. Beier
Abstract:
Despite tremendous advances in cardiovascular medicine, significant opportunities remain to improve coronary artery disease (CAD) prevention and treatment strategies. The key limitation lies in the understanding of disease formation and progression mechanisms. The coronary anatomy plays an important role in local haemodynamics, governing endothelial health and, thus, pathophysiological responses.…
▽ More
Despite tremendous advances in cardiovascular medicine, significant opportunities remain to improve coronary artery disease (CAD) prevention and treatment strategies. The key limitation lies in the understanding of disease formation and progression mechanisms. The coronary anatomy plays an important role in local haemodynamics, governing endothelial health and, thus, pathophysiological responses. The significant variation of the coronary anatomy among patients, with significant trends across different populations, increases the complexity of understanding the details of disease progression. This review covers different aspects of the current status and understanding of the blood flow investigation in coronary arteries. We summarised the current knowledge of the haemodynamic effect of coronary anatomy and its evaluation and analysis methods. We discussed recent progress across medical imaging techniques and computational haemodynamic analysis. Based on the reviewed papers, we identified the persisting knowledge gaps and challenges in the field. We then elaborated on future directions and opportunities to increase understanding of the fundamental mechanism of CAD in individuals representative of large populations and how this may translate to the patient's bedside.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2025;
originally announced July 2025.
-
Mode sensitivity: Connecting Lagrangian coherent structures with modal analysis for fluid flows
Authors:
Morgan R. Jones,
Charles Klewicki,
Oliver Khan,
Steven L. Brunton,
Mitul Luhar
Abstract:
We consider the relationship between modal representations obtained from data-driven decomposition methods and Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCSs). Mode sensitivity is used to describe this analysis as an extension of the model sensitivity framework developed by Kaszás and Haller (2020). The method, based on the computation of the finite-time-Lyapunov exponent, uses modes from fluid data to comp…
▽ More
We consider the relationship between modal representations obtained from data-driven decomposition methods and Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCSs). Mode sensitivity is used to describe this analysis as an extension of the model sensitivity framework developed by Kaszás and Haller (2020). The method, based on the computation of the finite-time-Lyapunov exponent, uses modes from fluid data to compute the amplitude perturbations experienced by fluid particle trajectories along with their sensitivity to initial conditions. Demonstrations of the method are presented with both periodic and turbulent flows, including a kinematic flow model, experimental data from the wake past an oscillating foil, numerical data of the classical cylinder wake flow, and a direct numerical simulation (DNS) of a turbulent channel flow. Mode sensitivity fields reveal both quantitatively and qualitatively how the finite-time Lyapunov exponent fields used to visualize LCSs change due to the influence of modes or external perturbations.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2024; v1 submitted 28 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Personalized and uncertainty-aware coronary hemodynamics simulations: From Bayesian estimation to improved multi-fidelity uncertainty quantification
Authors:
Karthik Menon,
Andrea Zanoni,
Owais Khan,
Gianluca Geraci,
Koen Nieman,
Daniele E. Schiavazzi,
Alison L. Marsden
Abstract:
Simulations of coronary hemodynamics have improved non-invasive clinical risk stratification and treatment outcomes for coronary artery disease, compared to relying on anatomical imaging alone. However, simulations typically use empirical approaches to distribute total coronary flow amongst the arteries in the coronary tree. This ignores patient variability, the presence of disease, and other clin…
▽ More
Simulations of coronary hemodynamics have improved non-invasive clinical risk stratification and treatment outcomes for coronary artery disease, compared to relying on anatomical imaging alone. However, simulations typically use empirical approaches to distribute total coronary flow amongst the arteries in the coronary tree. This ignores patient variability, the presence of disease, and other clinical factors. Further, uncertainty in the clinical data often remains unaccounted for in the modeling pipeline. We present an end-to-end uncertainty-aware pipeline to (1) personalize coronary flow simulations by incorporating branch-specific coronary flows as well as cardiac function; and (2) predict clinical and biomechanical quantities of interest with improved precision, while accounting for uncertainty in the clinical data. We assimilate patient-specific measurements of myocardial blood flow from CT myocardial perfusion imaging to estimate branch-specific coronary flows. We use adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to estimate the joint posterior distributions of model parameters with simulated noise in the clinical data. Additionally, we determine the posterior predictive distribution for relevant quantities of interest using a new approach combining multi-fidelity Monte Carlo estimation with non-linear, data-driven dimensionality reduction. Our framework recapitulates clinically measured cardiac function as well as branch-specific coronary flows under measurement uncertainty. We substantially shrink the confidence intervals for estimated quantities of interest compared to single-fidelity and state-of-the-art multi-fidelity Monte Carlo methods. This is especially true for quantities that showed limited correlation between the low- and high-fidelity model predictions. Moreover, the proposed estimators are significantly cheaper to compute for a specified confidence level or variance.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
