-
Kenneth Geddes Wilson (1936-2013)
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
Wilson was a physicist who changed both the substance and style of theoretical science.
Wilson was a physicist who changed both the substance and style of theoretical science.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
Innovations in Statistical Physics
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
In 1963-71, a group of people, myself included, formulated and perfected a new approach to physics problems, which eventually came to be known under the names of scaling, universality, and renormalization. This work formed the basis of a wide variety of theories ranging from its starting point in critical phenomena, and moving out to particle physics and relativity and then into economics and biol…
▽ More
In 1963-71, a group of people, myself included, formulated and perfected a new approach to physics problems, which eventually came to be known under the names of scaling, universality, and renormalization. This work formed the basis of a wide variety of theories ranging from its starting point in critical phenomena, and moving out to particle physics and relativity and then into economics and biology. This work was of transcendental beauty and of considerable intellectual importance.
This left me with a personal problem. What next? Constructing the answer to that question would dominate the next 45 years of my professional life. I would try to:
* Help in finding and constructing new fields of science
* Do research and give talks on science/society borderline
* Provide helpful, constructive criticism of scientific and technical work
* Help students and younger scientists
* Demonstrate scientific leadership
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2014; v1 submitted 25 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Entropy is in Flux
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
The science of thermodynamics was put together in the Nineteenth Century to describe large systems in equilibrium. One part of thermodynamics defines entropy for equilibrium systems and demands an ever-increasing entropy for non-equilibrium ones. However, starting with the work of Ludwig Boltzmann in 1872, and continuing to the present day, various models of non-equilibrium behavior have been put…
▽ More
The science of thermodynamics was put together in the Nineteenth Century to describe large systems in equilibrium. One part of thermodynamics defines entropy for equilibrium systems and demands an ever-increasing entropy for non-equilibrium ones. However, starting with the work of Ludwig Boltzmann in 1872, and continuing to the present day, various models of non-equilibrium behavior have been put together with the specific aim of generalizing the concept of entropy to non-equilibrium situations. This kind of entropy has been termed {\em kinetic entropy} to distinguish it from the thermodynamic variety. Knowledge of kinetic entropy started from Boltzmann's insight about his equation for the time dependence of gaseous systems. In this paper, his result is stated as a definition of kinetic entropy in terms of a local equation for the entropy density. This definition is then applied to Landau's theory of the Fermi liquid thereby giving the kinetic entropy within that theory.
Entropy has been defined and used for a wide variety of situations in which a condensed matter system has been allowed to relax for a sufficient period so that the very most rapid fluctuations have been ironed out. One of the broadest applications of non-equilibrium analysis considers quantum degenerate systems using Martin-Schwinger Green's functions\cite{MS} as generalized of Wigner functions, $g^<$ and $g^>$. This paper describes once again these how the quantum kinetic equations for these functions give locally defined conservation laws for mass momentum and energy. In local thermodynamic equilibrium, this kinetic theory enables a reasonable local definition of entropy density. However, when the system is outside of local equilibrium, this definition fails. It is speculated that quantum entanglement is the source of this failure.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Reflections on Gibbs: From Statistical Physics to the Amistad
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
This note is based upon a talk given at a celebration in Austin Texas of the achievements of J. Willard Gibbs.
J. Willard Gibbs, the younger, was the first American physical sciences theorist. He was one of the inventors of statistical physics. He introduced and developed the concepts of phase space, phase transitions, and thermodynamic surfaces in a remarkably correct and elegant manner. These…
▽ More
This note is based upon a talk given at a celebration in Austin Texas of the achievements of J. Willard Gibbs.
J. Willard Gibbs, the younger, was the first American physical sciences theorist. He was one of the inventors of statistical physics. He introduced and developed the concepts of phase space, phase transitions, and thermodynamic surfaces in a remarkably correct and elegant manner. These three concepts form the basis of different areas of physics. The connection among these areas has been a subject of deep reflection from Gibbs' time to our own. This talk therefore tries to celebrate Gibbs by talking about modern ideas about how different parts of physics fit together.
At the end of the talk, I shall get to a more personal note. Our own J. Willard Gibbs had all his achievements concentrated in science. His father, also J. Willard Gibbs, also a Professor at Yale, had one great achievement that remains unmatched in our day. I shall describe it.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2014; v1 submitted 10 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
The Early Years of Condensed Matter Physics at Illinois -- in Celebration of the 80th Birth Year of Charles P. Slichter -- Charlie Slichter & the gang at Urbana
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
The 1950s-- and perhaps also the 1960s-- were very special times for the development of solid-state/condensed-matter physics. The University of Illinois at Urbana was at the center of these activities. In areas like NMR and superconductivity, methods were developed which would form the basis for the next half century of science and technology. Experimentalists, including Charlie and John Wheatley,…
▽ More
The 1950s-- and perhaps also the 1960s-- were very special times for the development of solid-state/condensed-matter physics. The University of Illinois at Urbana was at the center of these activities. In areas like NMR and superconductivity, methods were developed which would form the basis for the next half century of science and technology. Experimentalists, including Charlie and John Wheatley, worked hand in hand with theorists, including the incomparable John Bardeen. They worked cooperatively to develop ideas, often born in Urbana, but with godparents at Harvard and Moscow and Paris. A characteristic style of broad collaboration and spirited exchange developed and spread from Illinois. This development was not an accident but the result of the vision of leaders like Wheeler Loomis, Fred Seitz, and later Gerald Almy1. The strong leadership saved the other scientists from expending their time on departmental decision-making. The style of the scientific activity was set by Fred, who strongly encouraged joint activities--especially the interaction between between theory and experiment and between physics and engineering. Fred encouraged comments from everyone, and helped everyone grow fast
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Kenneth Geddes Wilson, 1936-2013, An Appreciation
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
Kenneth G. Wilson made deep and insightful contributions to statistical physics, particle physics, and related fields. He was also a helpful and thoughtful human being.
Kenneth G. Wilson made deep and insightful contributions to statistical physics, particle physics, and related fields. He was also a helpful and thoughtful human being.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
-
Slippery Wave Functions V2.01
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
Superfluids and superconductors are ordinary matter that show a very surprising behavior at low temperatures. As their temperature is reduced, materials of both kinds can abruptly fall into a state in which they will support a persistent, essentially immortal, flow of particles. Unlike anything in classical physics, these flows engender neither friction nor resistance. A major accomplishment of Tw…
▽ More
Superfluids and superconductors are ordinary matter that show a very surprising behavior at low temperatures. As their temperature is reduced, materials of both kinds can abruptly fall into a state in which they will support a persistent, essentially immortal, flow of particles. Unlike anything in classical physics, these flows engender neither friction nor resistance. A major accomplishment of Twentieth Century physics was the development of an understanding of this very surprising behavior via the construction of partially microscopic and partially macroscopic quantum theories of superfluid helium and superconducting metals. Such theories come in two parts: a theory of the motion of particle-like excitations, called quasiparticles, and of the persistent flows itself via a huge coherent excitation, called a condensate. Two people, above all others, were responsible for the construction of the quasiparticle side of the theories of these very special low-temperature behaviors: Lev Landau and John Bardeen. Curiously enough they both partially ignored and partially downplayed the importance of the condensate. In both cases, this neglect of the actual superfluid or superconducting flow interfered with their ability to understand the implications of the theory they had created. They then had difficulty assessing the important advances that occurred immediately after their own great work.
Some speculations are offered about the source of this unevenness in the judgments of these two leading scientists.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
Theories of Matter: Infinities and Renormalization
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
This paper looks at the theory underlying the science of materials from the perspectives of physics, the history of science, and the philosophy of science. We are particularly concerned with the development of understanding of the thermodynamic phases of matter. The question is how can matter, ordinary matter, support a diversity of forms. We see this diversity each time we observe ice in contac…
▽ More
This paper looks at the theory underlying the science of materials from the perspectives of physics, the history of science, and the philosophy of science. We are particularly concerned with the development of understanding of the thermodynamic phases of matter. The question is how can matter, ordinary matter, support a diversity of forms. We see this diversity each time we observe ice in contact with liquid water or see water vapor (steam) rise from a pot of heated water. The nature of the phases is brought into the sharpest focus in phase transitions: abrupt changes from one phase to another and hence changes from one behavior to another. This article starts with the development of mean field theory as a basis for a partial understanding of phase transition phenomena. It then goes on to the limitations of mean field theory and the development of very different supplementary understanding through the renormalization group concept.
Throughout, the behavior at the phase transition is illuminated by an "extended singularity theorem", which says that a sharp phase transition only occurs in the presence of some sort of infinity in the statistical system. The usual infinity is in the system size. Apparently this result caused some confusion at a 1937 meeting celebrating van der Waals, since mean field theory does not respect this theorem. In contrast, renormalization theories can make use of the theorem. This possibility, in fact, accounts for some of the strengths of renormalization methods in dealing with phase transitions. The paper outlines the different ways phase transition phenomena reflect the effects of this theorem.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2010;
originally announced February 2010.
-
More is the Same; Phase Transitions and Mean Field Theories
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
This paper looks at the early theory of phase transitions. It considers a group of related concepts derived from condensed matter and statistical physics. The key technical ideas here go under the names of "singularity", "order parameter", "mean field theory", and "variational method".
In a less technical vein, the question here is how can matter, ordinary matter, support a diversity of forms.…
▽ More
This paper looks at the early theory of phase transitions. It considers a group of related concepts derived from condensed matter and statistical physics. The key technical ideas here go under the names of "singularity", "order parameter", "mean field theory", and "variational method".
In a less technical vein, the question here is how can matter, ordinary matter, support a diversity of forms. We see this diversity each time we observe ice in contact with liquid water or see water vapor, "steam", come up from a pot of heated water. Different phases can be qualitatively different in that walking on ice is well within human capacity, but walking on liquid water is proverbially forbidden to ordinary humans. These differences have been apparent to humankind for millennia, but only brought within the domain of scientific understanding since the 1880s.
A phase transition is a change from one behavior to another. A first order phase transition involves a discontinuous jump in a some statistical variable of the system. The discontinuous property is called the order parameter. Each phase transitions has its own order parameter that range over a tremendous variety of physical properties. These properties include the density of a liquid gas transition, the magnetization in a ferromagnet, the size of a connected cluster in a percolation transition, and a condensate wave function in a superfluid or superconductor. A continuous transition occurs when that jump approaches zero. This note is about statistical mechanics and the development of mean field theory as a basis for a partial understanding of this phenomenon.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2009; v1 submitted 3 June, 2009;
originally announced June 2009.
-
Intermittency and Universality in Fully-Developed Inviscid and Weakly-Compressible Turbulent Flows
Authors:
Roberto Benzi,
Luca Biferale,
Robert Fisher,
Leo Kadanoff,
Donald Lamb,
Federico Toschi
Abstract:
We performed high resolution numerical simulations of homogenous and isotropic compressible turbulence, with an average 3D Mach number close to 0.3. We study the statistical properties of intermittency for velocity, density and entropy. For the velocity field, which is the primary quantity that can be compared to the isotropic incompressible case, we find no statistical differences in its behavi…
▽ More
We performed high resolution numerical simulations of homogenous and isotropic compressible turbulence, with an average 3D Mach number close to 0.3. We study the statistical properties of intermittency for velocity, density and entropy. For the velocity field, which is the primary quantity that can be compared to the isotropic incompressible case, we find no statistical differences in its behavior in the inertial range due either to the slight compressibility or to the different dissipative mechanism. For the density field, we find evidence of ``front-like'' structures, although no shocks are produced by the simulation.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2007;
originally announced September 2007.
-
Excellence in Computer Simulation
Authors:
Leo P. Kadanoff
Abstract:
Excellent computer simulations are done for a purpose. The most valid purposes are to explore uncharted territory, to resolve a well-posed scientific or technical question, or to make a design choice. Stand-alone modeling can serve the first purpose. The other two goals need a full integration of the modeling effort into a scientific or engineering program.
Some excellent work, much of it rela…
▽ More
Excellent computer simulations are done for a purpose. The most valid purposes are to explore uncharted territory, to resolve a well-posed scientific or technical question, or to make a design choice. Stand-alone modeling can serve the first purpose. The other two goals need a full integration of the modeling effort into a scientific or engineering program.
Some excellent work, much of it related to the Department of Energy Laboratories, is reviewed. Some less happy stories are recounted.
In the past, some of the most impressive work has involved complexity and chaos. Prediction in a complex world requires a first principles understanding based upon the intersection of theory, experiment and simulation.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2003;
originally announced July 2003.
-
Reversible boolean networks II: Phase transition, oscillation, and local structures
Authors:
S. N. Coppersmith,
Leo P. Kadanoff,
Zhitong Zhang
Abstract:
We continue our consideration of a class of models describing the reversible dynamics of $N$ Boolean variables, each with $K$ inputs. We investigate in detail the behavior of the Hamming distance as well as of the distribution of orbit lengths as $N$ and $K$ are varied. We present numerical evidence for a phase transition in the behavior of the Hamming distance at a critical value…
▽ More
We continue our consideration of a class of models describing the reversible dynamics of $N$ Boolean variables, each with $K$ inputs. We investigate in detail the behavior of the Hamming distance as well as of the distribution of orbit lengths as $N$ and $K$ are varied. We present numerical evidence for a phase transition in the behavior of the Hamming distance at a critical value $K_c\approx 1.65$ and also an analytic theory that yields the exact bounds on $1.5 \le K_c \le 2.$
We also discuss the large oscillations that we observe in the Hamming distance for $K<K_c$ as a function of time as well as in the distribution of cycle lengths as a function of cycle length for moderate $K$ both greater than and less than $K_c$. We propose that local structures, or subsets of spins whose dynamics are not fully coupled to the other spins in the system, play a crucial role in generating these oscillations. The simplest of these structures are linear chains, called linkages, and rings, called circuits. We discuss the properties of the linkages in some detail, and sketch the properties of circuits. We argue that the observed oscillation phenomena can be largely understood in terms of these local structures.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2000; v1 submitted 1 September, 2000;
originally announced September 2000.
-
Reversible Boolean Networks I: Distribution of Cycle Lengths
Authors:
S. N. Coppersmith,
Leo P. Kadanoff,
Zhitong Zhang
Abstract:
We consider a class of models describing the dynamics of $N$ Boolean variables, where the time evolution of each depends on the values of $K$ of the other variables. Previous work has considered models with dissipative dynamics. Here we consider time-reversible models, which necessarily have the property that every possible point in the state-space is an element of one and only one cycle.
As i…
▽ More
We consider a class of models describing the dynamics of $N$ Boolean variables, where the time evolution of each depends on the values of $K$ of the other variables. Previous work has considered models with dissipative dynamics. Here we consider time-reversible models, which necessarily have the property that every possible point in the state-space is an element of one and only one cycle.
As in the dissipative case, when K is large, typical orbit lengths grow exponentially with N, whereas for small enough K, typical orbit lengths grow much more slowly with N. The numerical data are consistent with the existence of a phase transition at which the average orbit length grows as a power of N at a value of K between 1.4 and 1.7. However, in the reversible models the interplay between the discrete symmetry and quenched randomness can lead to enormous fluctuations of orbit lengths and other interesting features that are unique to the reversible case.
The orbits can be classified by their behavior under time reversal. The orbits that transform into themselves under time reversal have properties quite different from those that do not; in particular, a significant fraction of latter-type orbits have lengths enormously longer than orbits that are time reversal-symmetric. For large K and moderate N, the vast majority of points in the state-space are on one of the time reversal singlet orbits, and a random hopping model gives an accurate description of orbit lengths. However, for any finite K, the random hopping approximation fails qualitatively when N is large enough ($N\gg 2^{(2^K)}$).
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2000;
originally announced April 2000.
