Are Ultrathin Stents Optimal for Bifurcation Lesions? Insights from Computational Modelling of Provisional and DK-Crush Techniques
Authors:
Andrea Colombo,
Dario Carbonaro,
Mingzi Zhang,
Chi Shen,
Ramtin Gharleghi,
Ankush Kapoor,
Claudio Chiastra,
Nigel Jepson,
Mark Webster,
Susann Beier
Abstract:
Complex coronary bifurcation lesions remain challenging in percutaneous coronary intervention, with stent design and deployment strategy influencing clinical outcomes. This study compares the mechanical and hemodynamic performance of the ultrathin-strut Orsiro and thin-strut Xience Sierra stent in Provisional Side Branch (PSB) and Double Kissing Crush (DKC) techniques. We used finite element analy…
▽ More
Complex coronary bifurcation lesions remain challenging in percutaneous coronary intervention, with stent design and deployment strategy influencing clinical outcomes. This study compares the mechanical and hemodynamic performance of the ultrathin-strut Orsiro and thin-strut Xience Sierra stent in Provisional Side Branch (PSB) and Double Kissing Crush (DKC) techniques. We used finite element analyses of bifurcation stent deployment to assess malapposition, ostium clearance, and arterial wall stress for both techniques. Computational fluid dynamics simulations quantified the luminal exposure to low Time-Averaged Endothelial Shear Stress (TAESS below 0.4 Pa) and high shear rates (above 1000 1/s). In PSB, Orsiro showed higher malapposition (13.0% vs 9.6%) but improved SB ostium clearance (77% vs 64%) and lower low-TAESS exposure (30.3% vs 33.6%) compared to Xience. Orsiro also produced higher arterial wall stresses, particularly during kissing balloon inflation. In DKC, differences in malapposition and ostium clearance diminished between stents, though Orsiro retained a hemodynamic advantage with lower low-TAESS (28.2% vs 36.3%).Stent design influenced outcomes more strongly in PSB, where anatomical interaction and platform-specific behavior impacted both structural and hemodynamic results. In DKC, procedural complexity minimized those differences, making the stenting technique the primary performance driver. Nonetheless, Orsiro consistently preserved more favorable flow conditions. These findings highlight the need to match device selection with lesion characteristics in PSB, while in DKC, optimizing procedural steps may have a greater impact than the choice of stent platform.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
The Road to the Ideal Stent: A Review of Stent Design Optimisation Methods, Findings, and Opportunities
Authors:
Ankush Kapoor,
Nigel Jepson,
Neil W. Bressloff,
Poay Huan Loh,
Tapabrata Ray,
Susann Beier
Abstract:
Coronary stent designs have undergone significant transformations in geometry, materials, and drug elution coatings, contributing to the continuous improvement of stenting success over recent decades. However, the increasing use of percutaneous coronary intervention techniques on complex coronary artery disease anatomy continues to be a challenge and pushes the boundary to improve stent designs. D…
▽ More
Coronary stent designs have undergone significant transformations in geometry, materials, and drug elution coatings, contributing to the continuous improvement of stenting success over recent decades. However, the increasing use of percutaneous coronary intervention techniques on complex coronary artery disease anatomy continues to be a challenge and pushes the boundary to improve stent designs. Design optimisation techniques especially are a unique set of tools used to assess and balance competing design objectives, thus unlocking the capacity to maximise the performance of stents. This review provides a brief history of metallic and bioresorbable stent design evolution, before exploring the latest developments in performance metrics and design optimisation techniques in detail. This includes insights on different contemporary stent designs, structural and haemodynamic performance metrics, shape and topology representation, and optimisation along with the use of surrogates to deal with the underlying computationally expensive nature of the problem. Finally, an exploration of current key gaps and future possibilities is provided that includes hybrid optimisation of clinically relevant metrics, non-geometric variables such as material properties, and the possibility of personalised stenting devices.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2023; v1 submitted 14 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
