-
Technical design report for the CODEX-$β$ demonstrator
Authors:
CODEX-b collaboration,
:,
Giulio Aielli,
Juliette Alimena,
James Beacham,
Eli Ben Haim,
Andras Burucs,
Roberto Cardarelli,
Matthew Charles,
Xabier Cid Vidal,
Albert De Roeck,
Biplab Dey,
Silviu Dobrescu,
Ozgur Durmus,
Mohamed Elashri,
Vladimir Gligorov,
Rebeca Gonzalez Suarez,
Thomas Gorordo,
Zarria Gray,
Conor Henderson,
Louis Henry,
Philip Ilten,
Daniel Johnson,
Jacob Kautz,
Simon Knapen
, et al. (28 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The CODEX-$β$ apparatus is a demonstrator for the proposed future CODEX-b experiment, a long-lived-particle detector foreseen for operation at IP8 during HL-LHC data-taking. The demonstrator project, intended to collect data in 2025, is described, with a particular focus on the design, construction, and installation of the new apparatus.
The CODEX-$β$ apparatus is a demonstrator for the proposed future CODEX-b experiment, a long-lived-particle detector foreseen for operation at IP8 during HL-LHC data-taking. The demonstrator project, intended to collect data in 2025, is described, with a particular focus on the design, construction, and installation of the new apparatus.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
The LHCb upgrade I
Authors:
LHCb collaboration,
R. Aaij,
A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb,
C. Abellan Beteta,
F. Abudinén,
C. Achard,
T. Ackernley,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
P. Adlarson,
H. Afsharnia,
C. Agapopoulou,
C. A. Aidala,
Z. Ajaltouni,
S. Akar,
K. Akiba,
P. Albicocco,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
Z. Aliouche,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
R. Amalric,
S. Amato
, et al. (1298 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their select…
▽ More
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their selection in real time. The experiment's tracking system has been completely upgraded with a new pixel vertex detector, a silicon tracker upstream of the dipole magnet and three scintillating fibre tracking stations downstream of the magnet. The whole photon detection system of the RICH detectors has been renewed and the readout electronics of the calorimeter and muon systems have been fully overhauled. The first stage of the all-software trigger is implemented on a GPU farm. The output of the trigger provides a combination of totally reconstructed physics objects, such as tracks and vertices, ready for final analysis, and of entire events which need further offline reprocessing. This scheme required a complete revision of the computing model and rewriting of the experiment's software.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2024; v1 submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Experiments and Facilities for Accelerator-Based Dark Sector Searches
Authors:
Philip Ilten,
Nhan Tran,
Patrick Achenbach,
Akitaka Ariga,
Tomoko Ariga,
Marco Battaglieri,
Jianming Bian,
Pietro Bisio,
Andrea Celentano,
Matthew Citron,
Paolo Crivelli,
Giovanni de Lellis,
Antonia Di Crescenzo,
Milind Diwan,
Jonathan L. Feng,
Corrado Gatto,
Stefania Gori,
Felix Kling,
Luca Marsicano,
Simone M. Mazza,
Josh McFayden,
Laura Molina-Bueno,
Marco Spreafico,
Natalia Toro,
Matthew Toups
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper provides an overview of experiments and facilities for accelerator-based dark matter searches as part of the US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021). Companion white papers to this paper present the physics drivers: thermal dark matter, visible dark portals, and new flavors and rich dark sectors.
This paper provides an overview of experiments and facilities for accelerator-based dark matter searches as part of the US Community Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2021). Companion white papers to this paper present the physics drivers: thermal dark matter, visible dark portals, and new flavors and rich dark sectors.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
HL-LHC Computing Review Stage-2, Common Software Projects: Event Generators
Authors:
The HSF Physics Event Generator WG,
:,
Efe Yazgan,
Josh McFayden,
Andrea Valassi,
Simone Amoroso,
Enrico Bothmann,
Andy Buckley,
John Campbell,
Gurpreet Singh Chahal,
Taylor Childers,
Gloria Corti,
Rikkert Frederix,
Stefano Frixione,
Francesco Giuli,
Alexander Grohsjean,
Stefan Hoeche,
Phil Ilten,
Frank Krauss,
Michal Kreps,
David Lange,
Leif Lonnblad,
Zach Marshall,
Olivier Mattelaer,
Stephen Mrenna
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper has been prepared by the HEP Software Foundation (HSF) Physics Event Generator Working Group (WG), as an input to the second phase of the LHCC review of High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) computing, which is due to take place in November 2021. It complements previous documents prepared by the WG in the context of the first phase of the LHCC review in 2020, including in particular the WG paper…
▽ More
This paper has been prepared by the HEP Software Foundation (HSF) Physics Event Generator Working Group (WG), as an input to the second phase of the LHCC review of High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) computing, which is due to take place in November 2021. It complements previous documents prepared by the WG in the context of the first phase of the LHCC review in 2020, including in particular the WG paper on the specific challenges in Monte Carlo event generator software for HL-LHC, which has since been updated and published, and which we are also submitting to the November 2021 review as an integral part of our contribution.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software
Authors:
HEP Software Foundation,
:,
Thea Aarrestad,
Simone Amoroso,
Markus Julian Atkinson,
Joshua Bendavid,
Tommaso Boccali,
Andrea Bocci,
Andy Buckley,
Matteo Cacciari,
Paolo Calafiura,
Philippe Canal,
Federico Carminati,
Taylor Childers,
Vitaliano Ciulli,
Gloria Corti,
Davide Costanzo,
Justin Gage Dezoort,
Caterina Doglioni,
Javier Mauricio Duarte,
Agnieszka Dziurda,
Peter Elmer,
Markus Elsing,
V. Daniel Elvira,
Giulio Eulisse
, et al. (85 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this doc…
▽ More
Common and community software packages, such as ROOT, Geant4 and event generators have been a key part of the LHC's success so far and continued development and optimisation will be critical in the future. The challenges are driven by an ambitious physics programme, notably the LHC accelerator upgrade to high-luminosity, HL-LHC, and the corresponding detector upgrades of ATLAS and CMS. In this document we address the issues for software that is used in multiple experiments (usually even more widely than ATLAS and CMS) and maintained by teams of developers who are either not linked to a particular experiment or who contribute to common software within the context of their experiment activity. We also give space to general considerations for future software and projects that tackle upcoming challenges, no matter who writes it, which is an area where community convergence on best practice is extremely useful.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Challenges in Monte Carlo event generator software for High-Luminosity LHC
Authors:
The HSF Physics Event Generator WG,
:,
Andrea Valassi,
Efe Yazgan,
Josh McFayden,
Simone Amoroso,
Joshua Bendavid,
Andy Buckley,
Matteo Cacciari,
Taylor Childers,
Vitaliano Ciulli,
Rikkert Frederix,
Stefano Frixione,
Francesco Giuli,
Alexander Grohsjean,
Christian Gütschow,
Stefan Höche,
Walter Hopkins,
Philip Ilten,
Dmitri Konstantinov,
Frank Krauss,
Qiang Li,
Leif Lönnblad,
Fabio Maltoni,
Michelangelo Mangano
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We review the main software and computing challenges for the Monte Carlo physics event generators used by the LHC experiments, in view of the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) physics programme. This paper has been prepared by the HEP Software Foundation (HSF) Physics Event Generator Working Group as an input to the LHCC review of HL-LHC computing, which has started in May 2020.
We review the main software and computing challenges for the Monte Carlo physics event generators used by the LHC experiments, in view of the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) physics programme. This paper has been prepared by the HEP Software Foundation (HSF) Physics Event Generator Working Group as an input to the LHCC review of HL-LHC computing, which has started in May 2020.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2021; v1 submitted 28 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Design and performance of the LHCb trigger and full real-time reconstruction in Run 2 of the LHC
Authors:
R. Aaij,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
S. Amerio,
L. Anderlini,
P. d'Argent,
A. Baranov,
W. Barter,
S. Benson,
D. Bobulska,
T. Boettcher,
S. Borghi,
E. E. Bowen,
L. Brarda,
C. Burr,
J. -P. Cachemiche,
M. Calvo Gomez,
M. Cattaneo,
H. Chanal,
M. Chapman,
M. Chebbi,
M. Chefdeville,
P. Ciambrone
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run…
▽ More
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run 2. We describe the design of the Run 2 trigger and real-time reconstruction, and present data-driven performance measurements for a representative sample of LHCb's physics programme.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2019; v1 submitted 27 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Event generator tuning using Bayesian optimization
Authors:
Philip Ilten,
Mike Williams,
Yunjie Yang
Abstract:
Monte Carlo event generators contain a large number of parameters that must be determined by comparing the output of the generator with experimental data. Generating enough events with a fixed set of parameter values to enable making such a comparison is extremely CPU intensive, which prohibits performing a simple brute-force grid-based tuning of the parameters. Bayesian optimization is a powerful…
▽ More
Monte Carlo event generators contain a large number of parameters that must be determined by comparing the output of the generator with experimental data. Generating enough events with a fixed set of parameter values to enable making such a comparison is extremely CPU intensive, which prohibits performing a simple brute-force grid-based tuning of the parameters. Bayesian optimization is a powerful method designed for such black-box tuning applications. In this article, we show that Monte Carlo event generator parameters can be accurately obtained using Bayesian optimization and minimal expert-level physics knowledge. A tune of the PYTHIA 8 event generator using $e^+e^-$ events, where 20 parameters are optimized, can be run on a modern laptop in just two days. Combining the Bayesian optimization approach with expert knowledge should enable producing better tunes in the future, by making it faster and easier to study discrepancies between Monte Carlo and experimental data.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2017; v1 submitted 26 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
LHCb Topological Trigger Reoptimization
Authors:
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Philip Ilten,
Egor Khairullin,
Alex Rogozhnikov,
Andrey Ustyuzhanin,
Michael Williams
Abstract:
The main b-physics trigger algorithm used by the LHCb experiment is the so-called topological trigger. The topological trigger selects vertices which are a) detached from the primary proton-proton collision and b) compatible with coming from the decay of a b-hadron. In the LHC Run 1, this trigger, which utilized a custom boosted decision tree algorithm, selected a nearly 100% pure sample of b-hadr…
▽ More
The main b-physics trigger algorithm used by the LHCb experiment is the so-called topological trigger. The topological trigger selects vertices which are a) detached from the primary proton-proton collision and b) compatible with coming from the decay of a b-hadron. In the LHC Run 1, this trigger, which utilized a custom boosted decision tree algorithm, selected a nearly 100% pure sample of b-hadrons with a typical efficiency of 60-70%; its output was used in about 60% of LHCb papers. This talk presents studies carried out to optimize the topological trigger for LHC Run 2. In particular, we have carried out a detailed comparison of various machine learning classifier algorithms, e.g., AdaBoost, MatrixNet and neural networks. The topological trigger algorithm is designed to select all "interesting" decays of b-hadrons, but cannot be trained on every such decay. Studies have therefore been performed to determine how to optimize the performance of the classification algorithm on decays not used in the training. Methods studied include cascading, ensembling and blending techniques. Furthermore, novel boosting techniques have been implemented that will help reduce systematic uncertainties in Run 2 measurements. We demonstrate that the reoptimized topological trigger is expected to significantly improve on the Run 1 performance for a wide range of b-hadron decays.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
Absolute luminosity measurements with the LHCb detector at the LHC
Authors:
The LHCb Collaboration,
R. Aaij,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
C. Adrover,
A. Affolder,
Z. Ajaltouni,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
G. Alkhazov,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
A. A. Alves Jr,
S. Amato,
Y. Amhis,
J. Anderson,
R. B. Appleby,
O. Aquines Gutierrez,
F. Archilli,
L. Arrabito,
A. Artamonov,
M. Artuso,
E. Aslanides,
G. Auriemma,
S. Bachmann
, et al. (549 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Absolute luminosity measurements are of general interest for colliding-beam experiments at storage rings. These measurements are necessary to determine the absolute cross-sections of reaction processes and are valuable to quantify the performance of the accelerator. Using data taken in 2010, LHCb has applied two methods to determine the absolute scale of its luminosity measurements for proton-prot…
▽ More
Absolute luminosity measurements are of general interest for colliding-beam experiments at storage rings. These measurements are necessary to determine the absolute cross-sections of reaction processes and are valuable to quantify the performance of the accelerator. Using data taken in 2010, LHCb has applied two methods to determine the absolute scale of its luminosity measurements for proton-proton collisions at the LHC with a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV. In addition to the classic "van der Meer scan" method a novel technique has been developed which makes use of direct imaging of the individual beams using beam-gas and beam-beam interactions. This beam imaging method is made possible by the high resolution of the LHCb vertex detector and the close proximity of the detector to the beams, and allows beam parameters such as positions, angles and widths to be determined. The results of the two methods have comparable precision and are in good agreement. Combining the two methods, an overall precision of 3.5% in the absolute luminosity determination is reached. The techniques used to transport the absolute luminosity calibration to the full 2010 data-taking period are presented.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2012; v1 submitted 13 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
-
Hitchhiker's Guide to First Year Physics Labs at UCD
Authors:
Philip Ilten
Abstract:
This project began as a collection of handouts attempting to provide a slightly more in depth theoretical background to the first year labs performed at University College Dublin. Over time, these handouts were patched together, and this book (if it can be called a book) emerged. The book is intended to complement the University College Dublin first year laboratory manuals, but can also be read in…
▽ More
This project began as a collection of handouts attempting to provide a slightly more in depth theoretical background to the first year labs performed at University College Dublin. Over time, these handouts were patched together, and this book (if it can be called a book) emerged. The book is intended to complement the University College Dublin first year laboratory manuals, but can also be read independently. The UCD labs span a wide range of subjects, and consequently so do the chapters of this book, beginning with experimental techniques, moving onto classical mechanics, touching on E&M, and ending with a variety of more advanced topics.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2010;
originally announced September 2010.
