-
Characterizing Timing Parameters in Commercial SERF-OPM Multichannel Systems for Biomagnetic Field Sensing
Authors:
Eric Elzenheimer,
Hartmut Matz,
Jan Zerfowski,
Paul Anders,
Michael Höft,
Robert Rieger,
Surjo R. Soekadar,
Stephen Robinson,
Silvia Knappe-Grüneberg
Abstract:
Spin-Exchange Relaxation-Free Optically Pumped Magnetometers (SERF-OPMs) are increasingly used in multichannel biomagnetic sensing, yet their timing performance remains poorly characterized. This contribution presents the first cross-platform study of time delay, group delay, intra-channel variability, and settling time across four commercial SERF-OPM systems: Neuro-1 and QZFM Gen.2 (QuSpin Inc.),…
▽ More
Spin-Exchange Relaxation-Free Optically Pumped Magnetometers (SERF-OPMs) are increasingly used in multichannel biomagnetic sensing, yet their timing performance remains poorly characterized. This contribution presents the first cross-platform study of time delay, group delay, intra-channel variability, and settling time across four commercial SERF-OPM systems: Neuro-1 and QZFM Gen.2 (QuSpin Inc.), and HEDscan and FLv2 (FieldLine Inc.). Measurements were performed inside a magnetically shielded room (BMSR-2.1, PTB, Berlin) using an already introduced test bench. Results show frequency-dependent delays of 1-10 ms, intra-channel spreads up to +-1 ms, group delays between 1-15 ms, and settling times of 2-55 ms. Clear differences in manufacturer strategies were observed: QuSpin minimizes intra-channel variability through digital delay equalization, whereas FieldLine employs per-sensor calibration to optimize bandwidth and phase matching. In all systems, the time delay deviation between channels is in the sub-millisecond range in the 20-140 Hz band, which is sufficient for magnetoencephalography source localization. However, longer settling times in some platforms limit performance for rapid stimulation protocols. These findings provide the first vendor-comprehensive benchmarks for timing parameters in commercial SERF-OPM systems. They highlight the trade-offs between bandwidth, delay, and calibration strategies, and underscore the need for rigorous timing characterization to ensure waveform fidelity. The results are directly relevant to applications such as stimulation-evoked responses, brain-computer interfaces, and closed-loop neuromodulation.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2025;
originally announced September 2025.
-
Classification of Electron and Muon Neutrino Events for the ESS$ν$SB Near Water Cherenkov Detector using Graph Neural Networks
Authors:
J. Aguilar,
M. Anastasopoulos,
D. Barčot,
E. Baussan,
A. K. Bhattacharyya,
A. Bignami,
M. Blennow,
M. Bogomilov,
B. Bolling,
E. Bouquerel,
F. Bramati,
A. Branca,
G. Brunetti,
A. Burgman,
I. Bustinduy,
C. J. Carlile,
J. Cederkall,
T. W. Choi,
S. Choubey,
P. Christiansen,
M. Collins,
E. Cristaldo Morales,
P. Cupiał,
D. D'Ago,
H. Danared
, et al. (72 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In the effort to obtain a precise measurement of leptonic CP-violation with the ESS$ν$SB experiment, accurate and fast reconstruction of detector events plays a pivotal role. In this work, we examine the possibility of replacing the currently proposed likelihood-based reconstruction method with an approach based on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). As the likelihood-based reconstruction method is reas…
▽ More
In the effort to obtain a precise measurement of leptonic CP-violation with the ESS$ν$SB experiment, accurate and fast reconstruction of detector events plays a pivotal role. In this work, we examine the possibility of replacing the currently proposed likelihood-based reconstruction method with an approach based on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). As the likelihood-based reconstruction method is reasonably accurate but computationally expensive, one of the benefits of a Machine Learning (ML) based method is enabling fast event reconstruction in the detector development phase, allowing for easier investigation of the effects of changes to the detector design. Focusing on classification of flavour and interaction type in muon and electron events and muon- and electron neutrino interaction events, we demonstrate that the GNN reconstructs events with greater accuracy than the likelihood method for events with greater complexity, and with increased speed for all events. Additionally, we investigate the key factors impacting reconstruction performance, and demonstrate how separation of events by pion production using another GNN classifier can benefit flavour classification.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2025; v1 submitted 19 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Low-Frequency Magnetic Noise in Statically-Driven Solenoid for Biasing Magnetic Field Sensors
Authors:
Phillip Durdaut,
Henrik Wolframm,
Michael Höft
Abstract:
For the generation of static magnetic fields solenoids are frequently used for the purpose of research and development of magnetic field sensors. When such a sensor is to be analyzed with regard to its inherent noise the influence of other noise sources of the measurement system needs to be minimized. This article reports on the low-frequency magnetic noise within such a coil system. On the one ha…
▽ More
For the generation of static magnetic fields solenoids are frequently used for the purpose of research and development of magnetic field sensors. When such a sensor is to be analyzed with regard to its inherent noise the influence of other noise sources of the measurement system needs to be minimized. This article reports on the low-frequency magnetic noise within such a coil system. On the one hand, the impact of the intrinsic noise of the coil itself and on the other hand the impact of additional current noise of various commercially available current sources, which accordingly also leads to magnetic noise within the coil, are investigated. With low-frequency values in the range of a few tens of $\mathrm{fT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$, the coil's inherent noise is mostly neglectable. However, frequently utilized current sources for the generation of a static magnetic bias field lead to significant low-frequency magnetic flux noise typically in the $\mathrm{nT}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ regime. It is found that this noise cannot be decreased by increasing the coil's magnetic sensitivity, i.e. the magnetic flux density as a function of the static current. Instead, current sources with very high current-to-current-noise ratios are required.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2021; v1 submitted 15 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
A LOFAR Observation of Ionospheric Scintillation from Two Simultaneous Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances
Authors:
Richard A. Fallows,
Biagio Forte,
Ivan Astin,
Tom Allbrook,
Alex Arnold,
Alan Wood,
Gareth Dorrian,
Maaijke Mevius,
Hanna Rothkaehl,
Barbara Matyjasiak,
Andrzej Krankowski,
James M. Anderson,
Ashish Asgekar,
I. Max Avruch,
Mark Bentum,
Mario M. Bisi,
Harvey R. Butcher,
Benedetta Ciardi,
Bartosz Dabrowski,
Sieds Damstra,
Francesco de Gasperin,
Sven Duscha,
Jochen Eislöffel,
Thomas M. O. Franzen,
Michael A. Garrett
, et al. (33 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the results from one of the first observations of ionospheric scintillation taken using the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR). The observation was of the strong natural radio source Cas A, taken overnight on 18-19 August 2013, and exhibited moderately strong scattering effects in dynamic spectra of intensity received across an observing bandwidth of 10-80MHz. Delay-Doppler spectra (t…
▽ More
This paper presents the results from one of the first observations of ionospheric scintillation taken using the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR). The observation was of the strong natural radio source Cas A, taken overnight on 18-19 August 2013, and exhibited moderately strong scattering effects in dynamic spectra of intensity received across an observing bandwidth of 10-80MHz. Delay-Doppler spectra (the 2-D FFT of the dynamic spectrum) from the first hour of observation showed two discrete parabolic arcs, one with a steep curvature and the other shallow, which can be used to provide estimates of the distance to, and velocity of, the scattering plasma. A cross-correlation analysis of data received by the dense array of stations in the LOFAR "core" reveals two different velocities in the scintillation pattern: a primary velocity of ~30m/s with a north-west to south-east direction, associated with the steep parabolic arc and a scattering altitude in the F-region or higher, and a secondary velocity of ~110m/s with a north-east to south-west direction, associated with the shallow arc and a scattering altitude in the D-region. Geomagnetic activity was low in the mid-latitudes at the time, but a weak sub-storm at high latitudes reached its peak at the start of the observation. An analysis of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) and ionosonde data from the time reveals a larger-scale travelling ionospheric disturbance (TID), possibly the result of the high-latitude activity, travelling in the north-west to south-east direction, and, simultaneously, a smaller--scale TID travelling in a north-east to south-west direction, which could be associated with atmospheric gravity wave activity. The LOFAR observation shows scattering from both TIDs, at different altitudes and propagating in different directions. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that such a phenomenon has been reported.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Phase Sensitivity and Phase Noise of Cantilever-Type Magnetoelastic Sensors Based on the $Δ$E Effect
Authors:
Phillip Durdaut,
Enrico Rubiola,
Jean-Michel Friedt,
Cai Müller,
Benjamin Spetzler,
Christine Kirchhof,
Dirk Meyners,
Eckhard Quandt,
Franz Faupel,
Jeffrey McCord,
Reinhard Knöchel,
Michael Höft
Abstract:
Magnetoelastic sensors for the detection of low-frequency and low-amplitude magnetic fields are in the focus of research since more than 30 years. In order to minimize the limit of detection (LOD) of such sensor systems, it is of high importance to understand and to be able to quantify the relevant noise sources. In this contribution, cantilever-type electromechanic and magnetoelastic resonators,…
▽ More
Magnetoelastic sensors for the detection of low-frequency and low-amplitude magnetic fields are in the focus of research since more than 30 years. In order to minimize the limit of detection (LOD) of such sensor systems, it is of high importance to understand and to be able to quantify the relevant noise sources. In this contribution, cantilever-type electromechanic and magnetoelastic resonators, respectively, are comprehensively investigated and mathematically described not only with regard to their phase sensitivity but especially to the extent of the sensor-intrinsic phase noise. Both measurements and calculations reveal that the fundamental LOD is limited by additive phase noise due to thermal-mechanical noise of the resonator, i.e. by thermally induced random vibrations of the cantilever, and by thermal-electrical noise of the piezoelectric material. However, due to losses in the magnetic material parametric flicker phase noise arises, limiting the overall performance. In particular it is shown that the LOD is virtually independent of the magnetic sensitivity but is solely determined by the magnetic losses. Instead of the sensitivity, the magnetic losses, represented by the material's effective complex permeability, should be considered as the most important parameter for the further improvement of such sensors in the future. This implication is not only valid for magnetoelastic cantilevers but also applies to any type of magnetoelastic resonator.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Noise Analysis of Open-Loop and Closed-Loop SAW Magnetic Field Sensor Systems
Authors:
Phillip Durdaut,
Anne Kittmann,
Enrico Rubiola,
Jean-Michel Friedt,
Eckhard Quandt,
Reinhard Knöchel,
Michael Höft
Abstract:
Transmission surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors are widely used in various fields of application. In order to maximize the limit of detection (LOD) of such sensor systems, it is of high importance to understand and to be able to quantify the relevant noise sources. In this paper, low noise readout systems for the application with a SAW delay line magnetic field sensor in an open-loop and closed-l…
▽ More
Transmission surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors are widely used in various fields of application. In order to maximize the limit of detection (LOD) of such sensor systems, it is of high importance to understand and to be able to quantify the relevant noise sources. In this paper, low noise readout systems for the application with a SAW delay line magnetic field sensor in an open-loop and closed-loop configuration are presented and analyzed with regard to their phase noise contribution. By applying oscillator phase noise theory to closed-loop sensor systems, it is shown that the phase noise of the SAW delay line oscillator can be predicted accurately. This allows the derivation of expressions for the limits of detection for both readout structures. Based on these equations, the equivalence between the LOD of open-loop and closed-loop SAW delay line readout can be shown analytically, assuming that the sensor contributes the dominant phase noise. This equality is verified by measurements. These results are applicable to all kinds of phase sensitive delay line sensors.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2019; v1 submitted 5 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Equivalence of Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Operation of SAW Resonators and Delay Lines
Authors:
Phillip Durdaut,
Michael Höft,
Jean-Michel Friedt,
Enrico Rubiola
Abstract:
Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors in the form of two-port resonators or delay lines are widely used in various fields of application. Readout of such sensors is achieved by electronic systems operating either in an open-loop or in a closed-loop configuration. The mode of operation of the sensor system is usually chosen based on requirements like e.g. bandwidth, dynamic range, linearity, costs, a…
▽ More
Surface acoustic wave (SAW) sensors in the form of two-port resonators or delay lines are widely used in various fields of application. Readout of such sensors is achieved by electronic systems operating either in an open-loop or in a closed-loop configuration. The mode of operation of the sensor system is usually chosen based on requirements like e.g. bandwidth, dynamic range, linearity, costs, and immunity against environmental influences. Because the limit of detection (LOD) at the output of a sensor system is often one of the most important figures of merit, both readout structures, i.e. open-loop and closed-loop systems, are analyzed in terms of the minimum achievable LOD. Based on a comprehensive phase noise analysis of these structures for both, resonant sensors and delay line sensors, expressions for the various limits of detection are derived. Under generally valid conditions equivalence of open-loop and closed-loop operation is shown for both types of sensors. These results are not only valid for SAW devices but are also applicable to all kinds of phase sensitive sensors.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
A tank-circuit for ultrafast single particle detection in micropores
Authors:
Abhishek Bhat,
Paul V. Gwozdz,
Arjun Seshadri,
Marcel Hoeft,
Robert H. Blick
Abstract:
We present an ultrafast single sub-micron particle detection method based on a half-bowtie coplanar waveguide. The method is capable of resolving the translocation of these particles at a bandwidth greater than 30MHz. We compare experimentally the simultaneous use of our radio- frequency technique with conventional DC based resistive pulse recordings and find that our method has a throughput that…
▽ More
We present an ultrafast single sub-micron particle detection method based on a half-bowtie coplanar waveguide. The method is capable of resolving the translocation of these particles at a bandwidth greater than 30MHz. We compare experimentally the simultaneous use of our radio- frequency technique with conventional DC based resistive pulse recordings and find that our method has a throughput that is enhanced by two orders of magnitude. The technique incorporates a microfluidic circuit and has potential to be employed for screening nano particles and biopolymers such as DNA at frequencies in excess of 1 GHz.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2018; v1 submitted 3 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Pathway to the Square Kilometre Array - The German White Paper -
Authors:
F. Aharonian,
T. G. Arshakian,
B. Allen,
R. Banerjee,
R. Beck,
W. Becker,
D. J. Bomans,
D. Breitschwerdt,
M. Brüggen,
A. Brunthaler,
B. Catinella,
D. Champion,
B. Ciardi,
R. Crocker,
M. A. de Avillez,
R. J. Dettmar,
D. Engels,
T. Enßlin,
H. Enke,
T. Fieseler,
L. Gizon,
E. Hackmann,
B. Hartmann,
C. Henkel,
M. Hoeft
, et al. (48 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) is the most ambitious radio telescope ever planned. With a collecting area of about a square kilometre, the SKA will be far superior in sensitivity and observing speed to all current radio facilities. The scientific capability promised by the SKA and its technological challenges provide an ideal base for interdisciplinary research, technology transfer, and collabor…
▽ More
The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) is the most ambitious radio telescope ever planned. With a collecting area of about a square kilometre, the SKA will be far superior in sensitivity and observing speed to all current radio facilities. The scientific capability promised by the SKA and its technological challenges provide an ideal base for interdisciplinary research, technology transfer, and collaboration between universities, research centres and industry. The SKA in the radio regime and the European Extreme Large Telescope (E-ELT) in the optical band are on the roadmap of the European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) and have been recognised as the essential facilities for European research in astronomy.
This "White Paper" outlines the German science and R&D interests in the SKA project and will provide the basis for future funding applications to secure German involvement in the Square Kilometre Array.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2013;
originally announced January 2013.
