-
Virtual Dosimetrists: A Radiotherapy Training "Flight Simulator"
Authors:
Skylar S. Gay,
Tucker Netherton,
Barbara Marquez,
Raymond Mumme,
Mary Gronberg,
Brent Parker,
Chelsea Pinnix,
Sanjay Shete,
Carlos Cardenas,
Laurence Court
Abstract:
Effective education in radiotherapy plan quality review requires a robust, regularly updated set of examples and the flexibility to demonstrate multiple possible planning approaches and their consequences. However, the current clinic-based paradigm does not support these needs. To address this, we have developed 'Virtual Dosimetrist' models that can both generate training examples of suboptimal tr…
▽ More
Effective education in radiotherapy plan quality review requires a robust, regularly updated set of examples and the flexibility to demonstrate multiple possible planning approaches and their consequences. However, the current clinic-based paradigm does not support these needs. To address this, we have developed 'Virtual Dosimetrist' models that can both generate training examples of suboptimal treatment plans and then allow trainees to improve the plan quality through simple natural language prompts, as if communicating with a dosimetrist. The dose generation and modification process is accurate, rapid, and requires only modest resources. This work is the first to combine dose distribution prediction with natural language processing; providing a robust pipeline for both generating suboptimal training plans and allowing trainees to practice their critical plan review and improvement skills that addresses the challenges of the current clinic-based paradigm.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Resection cavity auto-contouring for patients with pediatric medulloblastoma using only CT information
Authors:
Soleil Hernandez,
Callistus Nguyen,
Skylar Gay,
Jack Duryea,
Rebecca Howell,
David Fuentes,
Jeannette Parkes,
Hester Burger,
Carlos Cardenas,
Arnold C. Paulino,
Julianne Pollard-Larkin,
Laurence Court
Abstract:
Purpose: Target delineation for radiation therapy is a time-consuming and complex task. Autocontouring gross tumor volumes (GTVs) has been shown to increase efficiency. However, there is limited literature on post-operative target delineation, particularly for CT-based studies. To this end, we trained a CT-based autocontouring model to contour the post-operative GTV of pediatric patients with medu…
▽ More
Purpose: Target delineation for radiation therapy is a time-consuming and complex task. Autocontouring gross tumor volumes (GTVs) has been shown to increase efficiency. However, there is limited literature on post-operative target delineation, particularly for CT-based studies. To this end, we trained a CT-based autocontouring model to contour the post-operative GTV of pediatric patients with medulloblastoma.
Methods: 104 retrospective pediatric CT scans were used to train a GTV auto-contouring model. 80 patients were then preselected for contour visibility, continuity, and location to train an additional model. Each GTV was manually annotated with a visibility score based on the number of slices with a visible GTV (1 = <25%, 2 = 25%-50%, 3 = >50%-75%, and 4 = >75%-100%). Contrast and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated for the GTV contour with respect to a cropped background image. Both models were tested on the original and pre-selected testing sets. The resulting surface and overlap metrics were calculated comparing the clinical and autocontoured GTVs and the corresponding clinical target volumes (CTVs).
Results: 80 patients were pre-selected to have a continuous GTV within the posterior fossa. Of these, 7, 41, 21, and 11 were visibly scored as 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively. The contrast and CNR removed an additional 11 and 20 patients from the dataset, respectively. The Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were 0.61 +/- 0.29 and 0.67 +/- 0.22 on the models without pre-selected training data and 0.55 +/- 13.01 and 0.83 +/- 0.17 on the models with pre-selected data, respectively. The DSC on the CTV expansions were 0.90 +/- 0.13. Conclusion: We automatically contoured continuous GTVs within the posterior fossa on scans that had contrast >=10 HU. CT-Based auto-contouring algorithms have potential to positively impact centers with limited MRI access.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Deep Learning-Based Dose Prediction for Automated, Individualized Quality Assurance of Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Plans
Authors:
Mary P. Gronberg,
Beth M. Beadle,
Adam S. Garden,
Heath Skinner,
Skylar Gay,
Tucker Netherton,
Wenhua Cao,
Carlos E. Cardenas,
Christine Chung,
David Fuentes,
Clifton D. Fuller,
Rebecca M. Howell,
Anuja Jhingran,
Tze Yee Lim,
Barbara Marquez,
Raymond Mumme,
Adenike M. Olanrewaju,
Christine B. Peterson,
Ivan Vazquez,
Thomas J. Whitaker,
Zachary Wooten,
Ming Yang,
Laurence E. Court
Abstract:
Purpose: This study aimed to use deep learning-based dose prediction to assess head and neck (HN) plan quality and identify suboptimal plans.
Methods: A total of 245 VMAT HN plans were created using RapidPlan knowledge-based planning (KBP). A subset of 112 high-quality plans was selected under the supervision of an HN radiation oncologist. We trained a 3D Dense Dilated U-Net architecture to pred…
▽ More
Purpose: This study aimed to use deep learning-based dose prediction to assess head and neck (HN) plan quality and identify suboptimal plans.
Methods: A total of 245 VMAT HN plans were created using RapidPlan knowledge-based planning (KBP). A subset of 112 high-quality plans was selected under the supervision of an HN radiation oncologist. We trained a 3D Dense Dilated U-Net architecture to predict 3-dimensional dose distributions using 3-fold cross-validation on 90 plans. Model inputs included CT images, target prescriptions, and contours for targets and organs at risk (OARs). The model's performance was assessed on the remaining 22 test plans. We then tested the application of the dose prediction model for automated review of plan quality. Dose distributions were predicted on 14 clinical plans. The predicted versus clinical OAR dose metrics were compared to flag OARs with suboptimal normal tissue sparing using a 2 Gy dose difference or 3% dose-volume threshold. OAR flags were compared to manual flags by 3 HN radiation oncologists.
Results: The predicted dose distributions were of comparable quality to the KBP plans. The differences between the predicted and KBP-planned D1%, D95%, and D99% across the targets were within -2.53%(SD=1.34%), -0.42%(SD=1.27%), and -0.12%(SD=1.97%), respectively, and the OAR mean and maximum doses were within -0.33Gy(SD=1.40Gy) and -0.96Gy(SD=2.08Gy). For the plan quality assessment study, radiation oncologists flagged 47 OARs for possible plan improvement. There was high interphysician variability; 83% of physician-flagged OARs were flagged by only one of 3 physicians. The comparative dose prediction model flagged 63 OARs, including 30 of 47 physician-flagged OARs.
Conclusion: Deep learning can predict high-quality dose distributions, which can be used as comparative dose distributions for automated, individualized assessment of HN plan quality.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2023; v1 submitted 28 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines
Authors:
Aaron Babier,
Rafid Mahmood,
Binghao Zhang,
Victor G. L. Alves,
Ana Maria Barragán-Montero,
Joel Beaudry,
Carlos E. Cardenas,
Yankui Chang,
Zijie Chen,
Jaehee Chun,
Kelly Diaz,
Harold David Eraso,
Erik Faustmann,
Sibaji Gaj,
Skylar Gay,
Mary Gronberg,
Bingqi Guo,
Junjun He,
Gerd Heilemann,
Sanchit Hira,
Yuliang Huang,
Fuxin Ji,
Dashan Jiang,
Jean Carlo Jimenez Giraldo,
Hoyeon Lee
, et al. (34 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiotherapy. Our framework includes reference plans for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer and high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four optimization mode…
▽ More
We establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiotherapy. Our framework includes reference plans for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer and high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four optimization models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans. The predictions and plans were compared to the reference plans via: dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose a model achieved; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) criterion; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models. The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50 to 0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions is generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better (P<0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH criteria. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for a conventional planning model. This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available at https://github.com/ababier/open-kbp-opt.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
