Back-Propagating Rupture: Nature, Excitation, and Implications
Authors:
Xiaotian Ding,
Shiqing Xu,
Eiichi Fukuyama,
Futoshi Yamashita
Abstract:
Recent observations show that certain rupture phase can propagate backward relative to the earlier one during a single earthquake event. Such back-propagating rupture (BPR) was not well considered by the conventional earthquake source studies and remains a mystery to the seismological community. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of BPR, by combining theoretical considerations, numerical sim…
▽ More
Recent observations show that certain rupture phase can propagate backward relative to the earlier one during a single earthquake event. Such back-propagating rupture (BPR) was not well considered by the conventional earthquake source studies and remains a mystery to the seismological community. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of BPR, by combining theoretical considerations, numerical simulations, and observational evidences. First, we argue that BPR in terms of back-propagating stress wave is an intrinsic feature during dynamic ruptures; however, its signature can be easily masked by the destructive interference behind the primary rupture front. Then, we propose an idea that perturbation to an otherwise smooth rupture process may make some phases of BPR observable. We test and verify this idea by numerically simulating rupture propagation under a variety of perturbations, including a sudden change of stress, bulk or interfacial property and fault geometry along rupture propagation path. We further cross-validate the numerical results by available observations from laboratory and natural earthquakes, and confirm that rupture "reflection" at free surface, rupture coalescence and breakage of prominent asperity are very efficient for exciting observable BPR. Based on the simulated and observed results, we classify BPR into two general types: interface wave and high-order re-rupture, depending on the stress recovery and drop before and after the arrival of BPR, respectively. Our work clarifies the nature and excitation of BPR, and can help improve the understanding of earthquake physics, the inference of fault property distribution and evolution, and the assessment of earthquake hazard.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Nucleation of laboratory earthquakes: quantitative analysis and scalings
Authors:
S. Marty,
H. S. Bhat,
J. Aubry,
E. Fukuyama,
S. Latour,
S. Nielsen,
R. Madariaga,
A. Schubnel
Abstract:
Decades of seismological observations have highlighted the variability of foreshock occurrence prior to natural earthquakes, making thus difficult to track how earthquakes start. Here, we report on three stick-slip experiments performed on cylindrical samples of Indian metagabbro under upper crustal stress conditions (30-60 $MPa$). Acoustic emissions (AEs) were continuously recorded by 8 calibrate…
▽ More
Decades of seismological observations have highlighted the variability of foreshock occurrence prior to natural earthquakes, making thus difficult to track how earthquakes start. Here, we report on three stick-slip experiments performed on cylindrical samples of Indian metagabbro under upper crustal stress conditions (30-60 $MPa$). Acoustic emissions (AEs) were continuously recorded by 8 calibrated acoustic sensors during the experiments. Seismological parameters (moment magnitude, corner frequency and stress-drop) of the detected AEs ($-8.8 \leq Mw \leq -7 $) follow the scaling law between moment magnitude and corner frequency that characterizes natural earthquakes. AE activity always increases towards failure and is found to be driven by along fault slip velocity. Consistently for all three experiments, the stacked AE foreshock sequences follow an inverse power-law of the time to failure (inverse Omori), with a characteristic Omori time $c$ inversely proportional to normal stress. AEs moment magnitudes increase towards failure, as manifested by a decrease in b-value from $\sim 1$ to $\sim 0.5$ at the end of the nucleation process. During nucleation, the averaged distance of foreshocks to mainshock also continuously decreases, highlighting the fast migration of foreshocks towards the mainshock epicenter location, and stabilizing at a distance from the latter compatible with the predicted Rate-and-State nucleation size. Importantly, we also show that the nucleation characteristic timescale scales inversely with applied normal stress and the expected nucleation size. Finally, the seismic component of the nucleation phase is orders of magnitude smaller than that of its aseismic component, which suggests that, in this experimental setting at least, foreshocks are the byproducts of a process almost fully aseismic.
△ Less
Submitted 24 December, 2022; v1 submitted 10 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
