Lift and drag forces acting on a particle moving with zero slip velocity near a wall
Authors:
Nilanka. I. K. Ekanayake,
Joseph D. Berry,
Anthony D. Stickland,
David E. Dunstan,
Ineke L. Muir,
Steven K. Dower,
Dalton J. E. Harvie
Abstract:
The lift and drag forces acting on a small, neutrally-buoyant spherical particle in a single-wall-bounded linear shear flow are examined via numerical computation. The effects of shear rate are isolated from those of slip by setting the particle velocity equal to the local fluid velocity (zero slip), and examining the resulting hydrodynamic forces as a function of separation distance. In contrast…
▽ More
The lift and drag forces acting on a small, neutrally-buoyant spherical particle in a single-wall-bounded linear shear flow are examined via numerical computation. The effects of shear rate are isolated from those of slip by setting the particle velocity equal to the local fluid velocity (zero slip), and examining the resulting hydrodynamic forces as a function of separation distance. In contrast to much of the previous numerical literature, low shear Reynolds numbers are considered ($10^{-3} \lesssim Re_γ \lesssim 10^{-1}$). This shear rate range is relevant when dealing with particulate flows within small channels, for example particle migration in microfluidic devices being used or developed for the biotech industry. We demonstrate a strong dependence of both the lift and drag forces on shear rate. Building on previous theoretical $Re_γ \ll 1$ studies, a wall-shear based lift correlation is proposed that is applicable when the wall lies both within the inner and outer regions of the disturbed flow. Similarly, we validate an improved drag correlation that includes higher order terms in wall separation distance that more accurately captures the drag force when the particle is close to, but not touching, the wall. Application of the new correlations shows that the examined shear based lift force is as important as the previously examined slip based lift force, highlighting the need to account for shear when predicting the near-wall movement of neutrally-buoyant particles.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
Viscoelectric Effects in Nanochannel Electrokinetics
Authors:
Wei-Lun Hsu,
Dalton J. E. Harvie,
Malcolm R. Davidson,
David E. Dunstan,
Junho Hwang,
Hirofumi Daiguji
Abstract:
Electrokinetic transport behavior in nanochannels is different to that in larger sized channels. Specifically, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in nanochannels have demonstrated two little understood phenomena which are not observed in microchannels, being: (i) the decrease of average electroosmotic mobility at high surface charge density, and (ii) the decrease of channel conductance at high sa…
▽ More
Electrokinetic transport behavior in nanochannels is different to that in larger sized channels. Specifically, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in nanochannels have demonstrated two little understood phenomena which are not observed in microchannels, being: (i) the decrease of average electroosmotic mobility at high surface charge density, and (ii) the decrease of channel conductance at high salt concentrations, as the surface charge is increased. However, current electric double layer models do not capture these results. In this study we provide evidence that this inconsistency primarily arises from the neglect of the viscoelectric effect (being the increase of local viscosity near charged surfaces due to water molecule orientation) in conventional continuum models. It is shown that predictions of electroosmotic mobility in a slit nanochannel, derived from a viscoelectric-modified continuum model, are in quantitative agreement with previous MD simulation results. Furthermore, viscoelectric effects are found to dominate over ion steric and dielectric saturation effects in both electroosmotic and ion transport processes. Finally, we indicate that mechanisms of the previous MD-observed phenomena can be well-explained by the viscoelectric theory.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2016; v1 submitted 8 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
