-
Limits on CO2 Climate Forcing from Recent Temperature Data of Earth
Authors:
David H. Douglass,
John R. Christy
Abstract:
The global atmospheric temperature anomalies of Earth reached a maximum in 1998 which has not been exceeded during the subsequent 10 years. The global anomalies are calculated from the average of climate effects occurring in the tropical and the extratropical latitude bands. El Nino/La Nina effects in the tropical band are shown to explain the 1998 maximum while variations in the background of t…
▽ More
The global atmospheric temperature anomalies of Earth reached a maximum in 1998 which has not been exceeded during the subsequent 10 years. The global anomalies are calculated from the average of climate effects occurring in the tropical and the extratropical latitude bands. El Nino/La Nina effects in the tropical band are shown to explain the 1998 maximum while variations in the background of the global anomalies largely come from climate effects in the northern extratropics. These effects do not have the signature associated with CO2 climate forcing. However, the data show a small underlying positive trend that is consistent with CO2 climate forcing with no-feedback.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2008;
originally announced September 2008.
-
Climate Forcing by the Volcanic Eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Revised edition
Authors:
David H. Douglass,
Robert S. Knox
Abstract:
We determine the volcano climate sensitivity and response time for the Mount Pinatubo eruption. This is achieved using observational measurements of the temperature anomalies of the lower troposphere and the aerosol optical density (AOD) in combination with a radiative forcing proxy for AOD. Using standard linear response theory we find sensitivity = 0.18 +- 0.04 K/(W/m2), which implies a negati…
▽ More
We determine the volcano climate sensitivity and response time for the Mount Pinatubo eruption. This is achieved using observational measurements of the temperature anomalies of the lower troposphere and the aerosol optical density (AOD) in combination with a radiative forcing proxy for AOD. Using standard linear response theory we find sensitivity = 0.18 +- 0.04 K/(W/m2), which implies a negative feedback of -1.0 +- 0.4. The intrinsic response time is 5.8+-1.0 months. Both results are contrary to the conventional paradigm that includes long response times and positive feedback. In addition, we analyze the outgoing longwave radiation during the Pinatubo eruption and find that its time dependence follows the forcing much more closely than the temperature, and even has an amplitude equal to that of the AOD proxy. This finding is independent of the response time and feedback results.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2005;
originally announced September 2005.
-
Climate sensitivity of Earth to solar irradiance: update
Authors:
David H. Douglass,
B. David Clader,
Robert S. Knox
Abstract:
This paper is a continuation of a study by Douglass and Clader. We extend the analysis through December 2003 using the latest updates of the observational temperature and solar irradiance data sets in addition to a new volcano proxy data set. We have re-determined the solar effect on the temperature from satellite measurements of the solar irradiance and the temperature of the lower troposphere…
▽ More
This paper is a continuation of a study by Douglass and Clader. We extend the analysis through December 2003 using the latest updates of the observational temperature and solar irradiance data sets in addition to a new volcano proxy data set. We have re-determined the solar effect on the temperature from satellite measurements of the solar irradiance and the temperature of the lower troposphere the sensitivity to solar irradiance. This re-analysis calculates two newly recognized dynamic and non-radiative flux factors which must be applied to the observed sensitivity. The sensitivity is about twice that expected from a no-feedback Stefan-Boltzmann radiation balance model, which implies positive feedback. The sensitivity to volcano forcing is also determined. Preliminary results indicate that negative feedback is present in this case. Response times of fractions of a year are found for both solar and volcano forcing. We note that climate models generally assume relaxation times of 5 to 10 years and we comment on the consequences of this large disparity. We also have determined a linear trend in the data.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2004;
originally announced November 2004.
-
Disparity of tropospheric and surface temperature trends: New evidence
Authors:
David H. Douglass,
Benjamin D. Pearson,
S. Fred Singer,
Paul C. Knappenberger,
Patrick J. Michaels
Abstract:
Observations suggest that the earth's surface has been warming relative to the troposphere for the last 25 years; this is not only difficult to explain but also contrary to the results of climate models. We provide new evidence that the disparity is real. Introducing an additional data set, R2 2 meter temperatures, a diagnostic variable related to tropospheric temperature profiles, we find trend…
▽ More
Observations suggest that the earth's surface has been warming relative to the troposphere for the last 25 years; this is not only difficult to explain but also contrary to the results of climate models. We provide new evidence that the disparity is real. Introducing an additional data set, R2 2 meter temperatures, a diagnostic variable related to tropospheric temperature profiles, we find trends derived from it to be in close agreement with satellite measurements of tropospheric temperature. This suggests that the disparity likely is a result of near-surface processes. We find that the disparity does not occur uniformly across the globe, but is primarily confined to tropical regions which are primarily oceanic. Since the ocean measurements are sea surface temperatures, we suggest that the disparity is probably associated with processes at the ocean-atmosphere interface. Our study thus makes unlikely some of the explanations advanced to account for the disparity; it also demonstrates the importance of distinguishing between land, sea and air measurements
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2004;
originally announced July 2004.
-
Altitude dependence of atmospheric temperature trends: Climate models versus observation
Authors:
David H. Douglass,
Benjamin D. Pearson,
S. Fred Singer
Abstract:
As a consequence of greenhouse forcing, all state of the art general circulation models predict a positive temperature trend that is greater for the troposphere than the surface. This predicted positive trend increases in value with altitude until it reaches a maximum ratio with respect to the surface of as much as 1.5 to 2.0 at about 200 to 400 hPa. However, the temperature trends from several…
▽ More
As a consequence of greenhouse forcing, all state of the art general circulation models predict a positive temperature trend that is greater for the troposphere than the surface. This predicted positive trend increases in value with altitude until it reaches a maximum ratio with respect to the surface of as much as 1.5 to 2.0 at about 200 to 400 hPa. However, the temperature trends from several independent observational data sets show decreasing as well as mostly negative values. This disparity indicates that the three models examined here fail to account for the effects of greenhouse forcings.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2004;
originally announced July 2004.
-
Temperature response of Earth to the annual solar irradiance cycle
Authors:
David H. Douglass,
Eric G. Blackman,
Robert S. Knox
Abstract:
We directly determine the sensitivity and time delay of Earth's surface temperature response to annual solar irradiance variations from 60 years of data. A two-layer energy balance model is developed to interpret the results. Explaining both the resulting low sensitivity and time delay of 1-2 months requires negative feedback.
We directly determine the sensitivity and time delay of Earth's surface temperature response to annual solar irradiance variations from 60 years of data. A two-layer energy balance model is developed to interpret the results. Explaining both the resulting low sensitivity and time delay of 1-2 months requires negative feedback.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2004;
originally announced March 2004.
-
On the Nature of the El Nino/La Nina Events
Authors:
David H. Douglass,
Drew R. Abrams,
David M. Baranson,
B. David Clader
Abstract:
We propose a scenario that explains many of the Pacific Ocean climate phenomena that are called El Nino/ La Nina. This scenario requires an event, which we call a Super-Nino Event. It dominates other phenomena when it occurs. A template of this event has been constructed giving the time evolution, which is an alternating sequence of 'El Ninos' and 'La Ninas'. The duration of the event is about 1…
▽ More
We propose a scenario that explains many of the Pacific Ocean climate phenomena that are called El Nino/ La Nina. This scenario requires an event, which we call a Super-Nino Event. It dominates other phenomena when it occurs. A template of this event has been constructed giving the time evolution, which is an alternating sequence of 'El Ninos' and 'La Ninas'. The duration of the event is about 15 years unless some other event intervenes. Three such events can explain most of the El Nino/La Nina features that have been observed since 1968. We find that the various El Nino/La Nina features that have been observed fall into types, associated with the oscillation in the template, which can be classified by a "Periodic Table". The Earth is presently experiencing one of these events which started in the mid 1990's and will continue for another 4-5 years. This extrapolation into the future suggests that a minor El Nino will begin in mid 2001 and will reach a maximum about a year later. The conditions under which such a Super Nino-Event may occur are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2002;
originally announced March 2002.
