MICROSCOPE: systematic errors
Authors:
Manuel Rodrigues,
Pierre Touboul1,
Gilles Metris,
Alain Robert,
Oceane Dhuicque,
Joel Berge,
Yves Andre,
Damien Boulanger,
Ratana Chhun,
Bruno Christophe,
Valerio Cipolla,
Pascale Danto,
Bernard Foulon,
Pierre-Yves Guidotti,
Emilie Hardy,
Phuong-Anh Huynh,
Vincent Lebat,
Francoise Liorzou,
Benjamin Pouilloux,
Pascal Prieur,
Serge Reynaud,
Patrizia Torresi
Abstract:
The MICROSCOPE mission aims to test the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) in orbit with an unprecedented precision of 10$^{-15}$ on the Eötvös parameter thanks to electrostatic accelerometers on board a drag-free micro-satellite. The precision of the test is determined by statistical errors, due to the environment and instrument noises, and by systematic errors to which this paper is devoted. Syste…
▽ More
The MICROSCOPE mission aims to test the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) in orbit with an unprecedented precision of 10$^{-15}$ on the Eötvös parameter thanks to electrostatic accelerometers on board a drag-free micro-satellite. The precision of the test is determined by statistical errors, due to the environment and instrument noises, and by systematic errors to which this paper is devoted. Systematic error sources can be divided into three categories: external perturbations, such as the residual atmospheric drag or the gravity gradient at the satellite altitude, perturbations linked to the satellite design, such as thermal or magnetic perturbations, and perturbations from the instrument internal sources. Each systematic error is evaluated or bounded in order to set a reliable upper bound on the WEP parameter estimation uncertainty.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
