-
Conceptual design of 20 T hybrid accelerator dipole magnets
Authors:
P. Ferracin,
G. Ambrosio,
M. Anerella,
D. Arbelaez,
L. Brouwer,
E. Barzi,
L. Cooley,
J. Cozzolino,
L. Garcia Fajardo,
R. Gupta,
M. Juchno,
V. V. Kashikhin,
F. Kurian,
V. Marinozzi,
I. Novitski,
E. Rochepault,
J. Stern,
G. Vallone,
B. Yahia,
A. V. Zlobin
Abstract:
Hybrid magnets are currently under consideration as an economically viable option towards 20 T dipole magnets for next generation of particle accelerators. In these magnets, High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) materials are used in the high field part of the coil with so-called insert coils, and Low Temperature Superconductors (LTS) like Nb3Sn and Nb-Ti superconductors are used in the lower fie…
▽ More
Hybrid magnets are currently under consideration as an economically viable option towards 20 T dipole magnets for next generation of particle accelerators. In these magnets, High Temperature Superconducting (HTS) materials are used in the high field part of the coil with so-called insert coils, and Low Temperature Superconductors (LTS) like Nb3Sn and Nb-Ti superconductors are used in the lower field region with so-called outsert coils. The attractiveness of the hybrid option lays on the fact that, on the one hand, the 20 T field level is beyond the Nb3Sn practical limits of 15-16 T for accelerator magnets and can be achieved only via HTS materials; on the other hand, the high cost of HTS superconductors compared to LTS superconductors makes it advantageous exploring a hybrid approach, where the HTS portion of the coil is minimized. We present in this paper an overview of different design options aimed at generating 20 T field in a 50 mm clear aperture. The coil layouts investigated include the Cos-theta design (CT), with its variations to reduce the conductor peak stress, namely the Canted Cos-theta design (CCT) and the Stress Management Cos-theta design (SMCT), and, in addition, the Block-type design (BL) including a form of stress management and the Common-Coil design (CC). Results from a magnetic and mechanical analysis are discussed, with particular focus on the comparison between the different options regarding quantity of superconducting material, field quality, conductor peak stress, and quench protection.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
MQXFA11 shipping incident report
Authors:
M. Baldini,
G. Ambrosio,
J. Blower,
J. Cozzolino,
T. Strauss,
G. Vallone
Abstract:
The truck transporting the MQXFA11 magnet from LBNL to BNL was involved in an accident on 7/20/22. It was rear ended by another truck. The magnet arrived at FNAL on July 28th. Upon arrival a visual inspection was performed. Accelerometers were removed and shock data were analyzed. Electrical checkout and a metrology survey were carried out. Strain data were also collected from the fiber optics ins…
▽ More
The truck transporting the MQXFA11 magnet from LBNL to BNL was involved in an accident on 7/20/22. It was rear ended by another truck. The magnet arrived at FNAL on July 28th. Upon arrival a visual inspection was performed. Accelerometers were removed and shock data were analyzed. Electrical checkout and a metrology survey were carried out. Strain data were also collected from the fiber optics installed on two coils and compared with data obtained before shipment. This report presents a summary of results
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Common Coil Dipole for High Field Magnet Design and R&D
Authors:
Ramesh Gupta,
Kathleen Amm,
Julien Avronsart,
Michael Anerella,
Anis Ben Yahia,
John Cozzolino,
Piyush Joshi,
Mithlesh Kumar,
Febin Kurian,
Chris Runyan,
William Sampson,
Jesse Schmalzle,
Stephan Kahn,
Ronald Scanlan,
Robert Weggel,
Erich Willen,
Qingjin Xu,
Javier Munilla,
Fernando Toral,
Paolo Ferracin,
Steve Gourlay,
GianLuca Sabbi,
Xiaorong Wang,
Danko van der Laan,
Jeremy Weiss
Abstract:
The common coil geometry provides an alternate design to the conventional cosine theta dipoles. It allows a wider range of conductor and magnet technologies. It also facilitates a low-cost, rapid-turn-around design and R&D program. Recent studies carried out as a part of the US Magnet Development Program revealed that at high fields (20 T with 15% operating margin or more), the common coil design…
▽ More
The common coil geometry provides an alternate design to the conventional cosine theta dipoles. It allows a wider range of conductor and magnet technologies. It also facilitates a low-cost, rapid-turn-around design and R&D program. Recent studies carried out as a part of the US Magnet Development Program revealed that at high fields (20 T with 15% operating margin or more), the common coil design also uses significantly less conductor (particularly much less HTS), as compared to that in the other designs.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
