Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Cabbolet, M J

Addendum to `On the nonreality of the PBR theorem': disproof by generic counterexample

Authors: Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

Abstract: The PBR theorem is widely seen as one of the most important no-go theorems in the foundations of quantum mechanics. Recently, in Found. Phys. 53(3): 64 (2023), it has been argued that there is no reality to the PBR theorem using a pair of bolts as a counterexample. In this addendum we expand on the argument: we disprove the PBR theorem by a generic counterexample, and we put the finger on the prec… ▽ More The PBR theorem is widely seen as one of the most important no-go theorems in the foundations of quantum mechanics. Recently, in Found. Phys. 53(3): 64 (2023), it has been argued that there is no reality to the PBR theorem using a pair of bolts as a counterexample. In this addendum we expand on the argument: we disprove the PBR theorem by a generic counterexample, and we put the finger on the precise spot where Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph have made a tacit assumption that is false. △ Less

Submitted 5 June, 2024; v1 submitted 24 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: 6 pages, 1 figure

Journal ref: Found. Phys. 54, 48 (2024)

On the nonreality of the PBR theorem

Authors: Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

Abstract: The PBR theorem has been hailed as one of the most important theorems in the foundations of quantum mechanics (QM), , cf. E. Samuel Reich, "Quantum theorem shakes foundations", Nature (2011). Here we argue that the special measurement, used by Pusey et al. to derive the theorem, is nonexisting from the Einsteinian view on QM. The PBR theorem has been hailed as one of the most important theorems in the foundations of quantum mechanics (QM), , cf. E. Samuel Reich, "Quantum theorem shakes foundations", Nature (2011). Here we argue that the special measurement, used by Pusey et al. to derive the theorem, is nonexisting from the Einsteinian view on QM. △ Less

Submitted 25 June, 2023; v1 submitted 21 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 5 pages, 2 figures, published after minor revisions

Journal ref: Foundations of Physics 53: 64 (2023)

On the fundamentally probabilistic nature of the knowledge of a microsystem in the framework of the Elementary Process Theory

Authors: Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

Abstract: A fundamental question in the debate about the interpretations of quantum mechanics (QM) is whether the universe is fundamentally deterministic or fundamentally probabilistic. This self-contained paper shows for a microsystem made up of a single neutron that is initially at rest in a stationary force-free environment, that even if the individual processes by which the microsystem evolves are funda… ▽ More A fundamental question in the debate about the interpretations of quantum mechanics (QM) is whether the universe is fundamentally deterministic or fundamentally probabilistic. This self-contained paper shows for a microsystem made up of a single neutron that is initially at rest in a stationary force-free environment, that even if the individual processes by which the microsystem evolves are fundamentally deterministic as described by a strictly deterministic model of the Elementary Process Theory (EPT), then still our most precise knowledge of the outcome of a position measurement on the microsystem is fundamentally probabilistic. Generalizing, the conclusion is that the EPT is inconsistent with orthodox QM, but consistent with $ψ$-epistemic QM. △ Less

Submitted 10 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: 11 pages, 3 figures

Comment to 'On the reality of the quantum state'

Authors: Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

Abstract: In Nature Phys. 8:475-478 (2012), Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph have claimed that ψ-epistemic quantum mechanics (QM) is inconsistent with predictions of standard QM. Here we show that Pusey et al. err in the beginning of their argument by making an assumption that violates the Projection Postulate. In Nature Phys. 8:475-478 (2012), Pusey, Barrett, and Rudolph have claimed that ψ-epistemic quantum mechanics (QM) is inconsistent with predictions of standard QM. Here we show that Pusey et al. err in the beginning of their argument by making an assumption that violates the Projection Postulate. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2018; v1 submitted 13 November, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: withdrawn by the author; due to a Babylonian confusion of tongues, the comment was based on an interpretation of statements in the PBR paper that was not implied by its authors (i.e., Pusey et al.)

Berkelian Idealism Regarding Properties in Orthodox Quantum Mechanics, and Implications for Quantum Gravity

Authors: Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

Abstract: Referring to the 18th century idealism of George Berkeley in which an object exists if and only if it is observed, this note shows that orthodox quantum mechanics (OQM) entails a Berkelian idealism regarding properties (BIRP): a quantum `has' a property X with quantitative value x if and only if the property X has just been measured with outcome x. It is then impossible to recontextualize GR's pri… ▽ More Referring to the 18th century idealism of George Berkeley in which an object exists if and only if it is observed, this note shows that orthodox quantum mechanics (OQM) entails a Berkelian idealism regarding properties (BIRP): a quantum `has' a property X with quantitative value x if and only if the property X has just been measured with outcome x. It is then impossible to recontextualize GR's principle of curvature in any quantum framework that implies this BIRP, for a quantum cannot curve space-time if it doesn't have a definite energy - which is supposed to be the cause of curvature - in absence of observation to begin with. Concluding, it is ruled out that a quantum theory of gravity, in which GR's principle of curvature is built in as a fundamental physical principle, can be developed in any framework implying this BIRP. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2015; v1 submitted 16 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

Comments: Paper presented at the Planck Scale II conference, held from 9-7-2015 to 9-12-2015 at Wroclaw University (Poland); 5 pages, 1 figure

A category mistake in observational claims regarding ultrashort-lived unstable particles

Authors: Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

Abstract: The physics literature contains many claims that ultrashort-lived unstable particles, such as a Higgs boson, have been observed. These claims are a matter of applying the $5σ$-convention in particle physics. This paper, however, shows that by applying this $5σ$-convention a category mistake is made, by which a pure reasoning is passed off as an observation. Not only are these two fundamentally dif… ▽ More The physics literature contains many claims that ultrashort-lived unstable particles, such as a Higgs boson, have been observed. These claims are a matter of applying the $5σ$-convention in particle physics. This paper, however, shows that by applying this $5σ$-convention a category mistake is made, by which a pure reasoning is passed off as an observation. Not only are these two fundamentally different primitive notions at the very basis of science, but the pure reasoning in question is also weaker than an observation: what we have in each case is that the existence of the ultrashort-lived unstable particle is inferred to the best explanation, but that does absolutely not merit the stronger claim that the particle in question has been "observed". Consequently, the observational claims in question will thus have to be dismissed as overstatements. On a general note, this demonstrates that the empirical support for the Standard Model of particle physics is significantly less than hitherto thought. △ Less

Submitted 23 July, 2018; v1 submitted 3 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures; this version is a proof that the $5 σ$-convention in particle physics is by itself inadequate for observational claims; the previous version, a conference paper with criticism on the $5σ$-convention from the perspective of existing philosophical literature, has been made available at philpapers.org

Journal ref: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33(38), 1850227 (2018)

Comment to a paper [arXiv:1103.4937] of M. Villata on antigravity

Authors: Marcoen J. T. F. Cabbolet

Abstract: In a recent paper of M. Villata [arXiv:1103.4937], it is claimed that "antigravity appears as a prediction of general relativity when CPT is applied." However, the present paper argues that Villata puts the cart before the horse qua methodology, and that the resulting theory cannot be reconciled with the ontological presuppositions of general relativity. The conclusion is that Villata's suggestion… ▽ More In a recent paper of M. Villata [arXiv:1103.4937], it is claimed that "antigravity appears as a prediction of general relativity when CPT is applied." However, the present paper argues that Villata puts the cart before the horse qua methodology, and that the resulting theory cannot be reconciled with the ontological presuppositions of general relativity. The conclusion is that Villata's suggestion for the physics that might underlie a gravitational repulsion of matter and antimatter is not acceptable in its current state of development. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2011; originally announced August 2011.

Comments: 3 pages

Journal ref: Astrophys. Space Sci. 337(1), 5-7 (2011)