-
Science for Peace and the need for Civil Clauses at universities and civilian research institutions
Authors:
J. Altmann,
U. Amaldi,
M. Barone,
A. Bassalat,
M. Bona,
J. Beullens,
H. Brand,
S. Brentjes,
D. Britzger,
J. Ellis,
S. Franchoo,
A. Giammanco,
A. Glazov,
C. Heck,
H. Jung,
S. Kraml,
L. Lönnblad,
M. Mangano,
M. Renneberg,
Th. Riebe,
A. Sabio-Vera,
R. Sanders,
J. Scheffran,
M. Schmelling,
T. Schucker
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
After the end of World War II, the commitment to confine scientific activities in universities and research institutions to peaceful and civilian purposes has entered, in the form of {\it Civil Clauses}, the charters of many research institutions and universities. In the wake of recent world events, the relevance and scope of such Civil Clauses has been questioned in reports issued by some governm…
▽ More
After the end of World War II, the commitment to confine scientific activities in universities and research institutions to peaceful and civilian purposes has entered, in the form of {\it Civil Clauses}, the charters of many research institutions and universities. In the wake of recent world events, the relevance and scope of such Civil Clauses has been questioned in reports issued by some governments and by the EU Commission, a development that opens the door to a possible blurring of the distinction between peaceful and military research.
This paper documents the reflections stimulated by a panel discussion on this issue recently organized by the Science4Peace Forum. We review the adoptions of Civil Clauses in research organizations and institutions in various countries, present evidence of the challenges that are emerging to such Civil Clauses, and collect arguments in favour of maintaining the purely civilian and peaceful focus of public (non-military) research.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
A Science4Peace initiative: Alleviating the consequences of sanctions in international scientific cooperation
Authors:
A. Ali,
M. Barone,
S. Brentjes,
D. Britzger,
M. Dittmar,
T. Ekelöf,
J. Ellis,
S. Fonseca de Souza,
A. Glazov,
A. V. Gritsan,
R. Hoffmann,
H. Jung,
M. Klein,
V. Klyukhin,
V. Korbel,
P. Kokkas,
P. Kostka,
U. Langenegger,
J. List,
N. Raicevic,
A. Rostovtsev,
A. Sabio Vera,
M. Spiro,
G. Tonelli,
P. van Mechelen
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The armed invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation has adversely affected the relations between Russia and Western countries. Among other aspects, it has put scientific cooperation and collaboration into question and changed the scientific landscape significantly. Cooperation between some Western institutions and their Russian and Belarusian partners were put on hold after February 24, 2022.…
▽ More
The armed invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation has adversely affected the relations between Russia and Western countries. Among other aspects, it has put scientific cooperation and collaboration into question and changed the scientific landscape significantly. Cooperation between some Western institutions and their Russian and Belarusian partners were put on hold after February 24, 2022. The CERN Council decided at its meeting in December 2023 to terminate cooperation agreements with Russia and Belarus that date back a decade. CERN is an international institution with UN observer status, and has so far played a role in international cooperation which was independent of national political strategies. We argue that the Science4Peace idea still has a great value and scientific collaboration between scientists must continue, since fundamental science is by its nature an international discipline. A ban of scientists participating in international cooperation and collaboration is against the traditions, requirements and understanding of science. We call for measures to reactivate the peaceful cooperation of individual scientists on fundamental research in order to stimulate international cooperation for a more peaceful world in the future. Specifically, we plead for finding ways to continue this cooperation through international organizations, such as CERN and JINR.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Beyond a Year of Sanctions in Science
Authors:
M. Albrecht,
A. Ali,
M. Barone,
S. Brentjes,
M. Bona,
J. Ellis,
A. Glazov,
H. Jung,
M. Mangano,
G. Neuneck,
N. Raicevic,
J. Scheffran,
M. Spiro,
P. van Mechelen,
J. Vigen
Abstract:
While sanctions in political and economic areas are now part of the standard repertoire of Western countries (not always endorsed by UN mandates), sanctions in science and culture in general are new. Historically, fundamental research as conducted at international research centers such as CERN has long been seen as a driver for peace, and the Science4Peace idea has been celebrated for decades. How…
▽ More
While sanctions in political and economic areas are now part of the standard repertoire of Western countries (not always endorsed by UN mandates), sanctions in science and culture in general are new. Historically, fundamental research as conducted at international research centers such as CERN has long been seen as a driver for peace, and the Science4Peace idea has been celebrated for decades. However, much changed with the war against Ukraine, and most Western science organizations put scientific cooperation with Russia and Belarus on hold immediately after the start of the war in 2022. In addition, common publications and participation in conferences were banned by some institutions, going against the ideal of free scientific exchange and communication.
These and other points were the topics of an international virtual panel discussion organized by the Science4Peace Forum together with the "Natural Scientists Initiative - Responsibility for Peace and Sustainability" (NatWiss e.V.) in Germany and the journal "Wissenschaft und Frieden" (W&F) (see the Figure). Fellows from the Hamburg Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (IFSH), scientists collaborating with the large physics research institutes DESY and CERN, as well as from climate and futures researchers were represented on the panel.
In this Dossier we document the panel discussion, and give additional perspectives.
The authors of the individual sections present their personal reflections, which should not be taken as implying that they are endorsed by the Science4Peace Forum or any other organizations. It is regrettable that some colleagues who expressed support for this document felt that it would be unwise for them to co-sign it.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
