-
CMS Token Transition
Authors:
Brian Bockelman,
Rahul Chauhan,
Diego Ciangottini,
Dave Dykstra,
Edita Kizinevic,
Stephan Lammel,
Marco Mascheroni,
Sarun Nuntaviriyakul,
Panos Paparrigopoulos,
Alan Malta Rodrigues,
Chan-anun Rungphitakchai,
Eric Vaandering,
Vaiva Zokaite
Abstract:
Within the LHC community, a momentous transition has been occurring in authorization. For nearly 20 years, services within the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) have authorized based on mapping an identity, derived from an X.509 credential, or a group/role, derived from a VOMS extension issued by the experiment. A fundamental shift is occurring to capabilities: the credential, a bearer token, as…
▽ More
Within the LHC community, a momentous transition has been occurring in authorization. For nearly 20 years, services within the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) have authorized based on mapping an identity, derived from an X.509 credential, or a group/role, derived from a VOMS extension issued by the experiment. A fundamental shift is occurring to capabilities: the credential, a bearer token, asserts the authorizations of the bearer, not the identity. By the HL-LHC era, the CMS experiment plans for the transition to tokens, based on the WLCG Common JSON Web Token profile, to be complete. Services in the technology architecture include the INDIGO Identity and Access Management server to issue tokens; a HashiCorp Vault server to store and refresh access tokens for users and jobs; a managed token bastion server to push credentials to the HTCondor CredMon service; and HTCondor to maintain valid tokens in long-running batch jobs. We will describe the transition plans of the experiment, current status, configuration of the central authorization server, lessons learned in commissioning token-based access with sites, and operational experience using tokens for both job submissions and file transfers.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2025; v1 submitted 31 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
IRIS-HEP Strategic Plan for the Next Phase of Software Upgrades for HL-LHC Physics
Authors:
Brian Bockelman,
Peter Elmer,
Gordon Watts
Abstract:
The quest to understand the fundamental building blocks of nature and their interactions is one of the oldest and most ambitious of human scientific endeavors. CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) represents a huge step forward in this quest. The discovery of the Higgs boson, the observation of exceedingly rare decays of $B$ mesons, and stringent constraints on many viable theories of physics beyond…
▽ More
The quest to understand the fundamental building blocks of nature and their interactions is one of the oldest and most ambitious of human scientific endeavors. CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) represents a huge step forward in this quest. The discovery of the Higgs boson, the observation of exceedingly rare decays of $B$ mesons, and stringent constraints on many viable theories of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) demonstrate the great scientific value of the LHC physics program. The next phase of this global scientific project will be the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) which will collect data starting circa 2029 and continue through the 2030s. The primary science goal is to search for physics beyond the SM and, should it be discovered, to study its implications. In the HL-LHC era, the ATLAS and CMS experiments will record around 100 times as many collisions as were used to discover the Higgs boson (and at twice the energy). Both NSF and DOE are making large detector upgrade investments so the HL-LHC can operate in this high-rate environment. Similar investment in software R&D for acquiring, managing, processing and analyzing HL-LHC data is critical to maximize the return-on-investment in the upgraded accelerator and detectors. This report presents a strategic plan for a possible second 5-year funded phase (2023 through 2028) for the Institute for Research and Innovation in Software for High Energy Physics (IRIS-HEP) which will close remaining software and computing gaps to deliver HL-LHC science.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Collaborative Computing Support for Analysis Facilities Exploiting Software as Infrastructure Techniques
Authors:
Maria Acosta Flechas,
Garhan Attebury,
Kenneth Bloom,
Brian Bockelman,
Lindsey Gray,
Burt Holzman,
Carl Lundstedt,
Oksana Shadura,
Nicholas Smith,
John Thiltges
Abstract:
Prior to the public release of Kubernetes it was difficult to conduct joint development of elaborate analysis facilities due to the highly non-homogeneous nature of hardware and network topology across compute facilities. However, since the advent of systems like Kubernetes and OpenShift, which provide declarative interfaces for building fault-tolerant and self-healing deployments of networked sof…
▽ More
Prior to the public release of Kubernetes it was difficult to conduct joint development of elaborate analysis facilities due to the highly non-homogeneous nature of hardware and network topology across compute facilities. However, since the advent of systems like Kubernetes and OpenShift, which provide declarative interfaces for building fault-tolerant and self-healing deployments of networked software, it is possible for multiple institutes to collaborate more effectively since resource details are abstracted away through various forms of hardware and software virtualization. In this whitepaper we will outline the development of two analysis facilities: "Coffea-casa" at University of Nebraska Lincoln and the "Elastic Analysis Facility" at Fermilab, and how utilizing platform abstraction has improved the development of common software for each of these facilities, and future development plans made possible by this methodology.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2022; v1 submitted 18 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Adapting LIGO workflows to run in the Open Science Grid
Authors:
Edgar Fajardo,
Frank Wuerthwein,
Brian Bockelman,
Miron Livny,
Greg Thain,
James Alexander Clark,
Peter Couvares,
Josh Willis
Abstract:
During the first observation run the LIGO collaboration needed to offload some of its most, intense CPU workflows from its dedicated computing sites to opportunistic resources. Open Science Grid enabled LIGO to run PyCbC, RIFT and Bayeswave workflows to seamlessly run in a combination of owned and opportunistic resources. One of the challenges is enabling the workflows to use several heterogeneous…
▽ More
During the first observation run the LIGO collaboration needed to offload some of its most, intense CPU workflows from its dedicated computing sites to opportunistic resources. Open Science Grid enabled LIGO to run PyCbC, RIFT and Bayeswave workflows to seamlessly run in a combination of owned and opportunistic resources. One of the challenges is enabling the workflows to use several heterogeneous resources in a coordinated and effective way.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Towards an Intelligent Data Delivery Service
Authors:
Wen Guan,
Tadashi Maeno,
Gancho Dimitrov,
Brian Paul Bockelman,
Torre Wenaus,
Vakhtang Tsulaia,
Nicolo Magini
Abstract:
The ATLAS Event Streaming Service (ESS) at the LHC is an approach to preprocess and deliver data for Event Service (ES) that has implemented a fine-grained approach for ATLAS event processing. The ESS allows one to asynchronously deliver only the input events required by ES processing, with the aim to decrease data traffic over WAN and improve overall data processing throughput. A prototype of ESS…
▽ More
The ATLAS Event Streaming Service (ESS) at the LHC is an approach to preprocess and deliver data for Event Service (ES) that has implemented a fine-grained approach for ATLAS event processing. The ESS allows one to asynchronously deliver only the input events required by ES processing, with the aim to decrease data traffic over WAN and improve overall data processing throughput. A prototype of ESS was developed to deliver streaming events to fine-grained ES jobs. Based on it, an intelligent Data Delivery Service (iDDS) is under development to decouple the "cold format" and the processing format of the data, which also opens the opportunity to include the production systems of other HEP experiments. Here we will at first present the ESS model view and its motivations for iDDS system. Then we will also present the iDDS schema, architecture and the applications of iDDS.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group -- Data Organization, Management and Access (DOMA)
Authors:
Dario Berzano,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Brian Bockelman,
Simone Campana,
Kaushik De,
Dirk Duellmann,
Peter Elmer,
Robert Gardner,
Vincent Garonne,
Claudio Grandi,
Oliver Gutsche,
Andrew Hanushevsky,
Burt Holzman,
Bodhitha Jayatilaka,
Ivo Jimenez,
Michel Jouvin,
Oliver Keeble,
Alexei Klimentov,
Valentin Kuznetsov,
Eric Lancon,
Mario Lassnig,
Miron Livny,
Carlos Maltzahn,
Shawn McKee
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Without significant changes to data organization, management, and access (DOMA), HEP experiments will find scientific output limited by how fast data can be accessed and digested by computational resources. In this white paper we discuss challenges in DOMA that HEP experiments, such as the HL-LHC, will face as well as potential ways to address them. A research and development timeline to assess th…
▽ More
Without significant changes to data organization, management, and access (DOMA), HEP experiments will find scientific output limited by how fast data can be accessed and digested by computational resources. In this white paper we discuss challenges in DOMA that HEP experiments, such as the HL-LHC, will face as well as potential ways to address them. A research and development timeline to assess these changes is also proposed.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Data Analysis and Interpretation
Authors:
Lothar Bauerdick,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Brian Bockelman,
Nuno Castro,
Kyle Cranmer,
Peter Elmer,
Robert Gardner,
Maria Girone,
Oliver Gutsche,
Benedikt Hegner,
José M. Hernández,
Bodhitha Jayatilaka,
David Lange,
Mark S. Neubauer,
Daniel S. Katz,
Lukasz Kreczko,
James Letts,
Shawn McKee,
Christoph Paus,
Kevin Pedro,
Jim Pivarski,
Martin Ritter,
Eduardo Rodrigues,
Tai Sakuma,
Elizabeth Sexton-Kennedy
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
At the heart of experimental high energy physics (HEP) is the development of facilities and instrumentation that provide sensitivity to new phenomena. Our understanding of nature at its most fundamental level is advanced through the analysis and interpretation of data from sophisticated detectors in HEP experiments. The goal of data analysis systems is to realize the maximum possible scientific po…
▽ More
At the heart of experimental high energy physics (HEP) is the development of facilities and instrumentation that provide sensitivity to new phenomena. Our understanding of nature at its most fundamental level is advanced through the analysis and interpretation of data from sophisticated detectors in HEP experiments. The goal of data analysis systems is to realize the maximum possible scientific potential of the data within the constraints of computing and human resources in the least time. To achieve this goal, future analysis systems should empower physicists to access the data with a high level of interactivity, reproducibility and throughput capability. As part of the HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper process, a working group on Data Analysis and Interpretation was formed to assess the challenges and opportunities in HEP data analysis and develop a roadmap for activities in this area over the next decade. In this report, the key findings and recommendations of the Data Analysis and Interpretation Working Group are presented.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
A Roadmap for HEP Software and Computing R&D for the 2020s
Authors:
Johannes Albrecht,
Antonio Augusto Alves Jr,
Guilherme Amadio,
Giuseppe Andronico,
Nguyen Anh-Ky,
Laurent Aphecetche,
John Apostolakis,
Makoto Asai,
Luca Atzori,
Marian Babik,
Giuseppe Bagliesi,
Marilena Bandieramonte,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Martin Barisits,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Stefano Belforte,
Douglas Benjamin,
Catrin Bernius,
Wahid Bhimji,
Riccardo Maria Bianchi,
Ian Bird,
Catherine Biscarat,
Jakob Blomer,
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali
, et al. (285 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for…
▽ More
Particle physics has an ambitious and broad experimental programme for the coming decades. This programme requires large investments in detector hardware, either to build new facilities and experiments, or to upgrade existing ones. Similarly, it requires commensurate investment in the R&D of software to acquire, manage, process, and analyse the shear amounts of data to be recorded. In planning for the HL-LHC in particular, it is critical that all of the collaborating stakeholders agree on the software goals and priorities, and that the efforts complement each other. In this spirit, this white paper describes the R&D activities required to prepare for this software upgrade.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2018; v1 submitted 18 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
HEPCloud, a New Paradigm for HEP Facilities: CMS Amazon Web Services Investigation
Authors:
Burt Holzman,
Lothar A. T. Bauerdick,
Brian Bockelman,
Dave Dykstra,
Ian Fisk,
Stuart Fuess,
Gabriele Garzoglio,
Maria Girone,
Oliver Gutsche,
Dirk Hufnagel,
Hyunwoo Kim,
Robert Kennedy,
Nicolo Magini,
David Mason,
Panagiotis Spentzouris,
Anthony Tiradani,
Steve Timm,
Eric W. Vaandering
Abstract:
Historically, high energy physics computing has been performed on large purpose-built computing systems. These began as single-site compute facilities, but have evolved into the distributed computing grids used today. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the capacity and capability of commercial clouds. Cloud resources are highly virtualized and intended to be able to be flexibly de…
▽ More
Historically, high energy physics computing has been performed on large purpose-built computing systems. These began as single-site compute facilities, but have evolved into the distributed computing grids used today. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the capacity and capability of commercial clouds. Cloud resources are highly virtualized and intended to be able to be flexibly deployed for a variety of computing tasks. There is a growing nterest among the cloud providers to demonstrate the capability to perform large-scale scientific computing. In this paper, we discuss results from the CMS experiment using the Fermilab HEPCloud facility, which utilized both local Fermilab resources and virtual machines in the Amazon Web Services Elastic Compute Cloud. We discuss the planning, technical challenges, and lessons learned involved in performing physics workflows on a large-scale set of virtualized resources. In addition, we will discuss the economics and operational efficiencies when executing workflows both in the cloud and on dedicated resources.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report
Authors:
Salman Habib,
Robert Roser,
Richard Gerber,
Katie Antypas,
Katherine Riley,
Tim Williams,
Jack Wells,
Tjerk Straatsma,
A. Almgren,
J. Amundson,
S. Bailey,
D. Bard,
K. Bloom,
B. Bockelman,
A. Borgland,
J. Borrill,
R. Boughezal,
R. Brower,
B. Cowan,
H. Finkel,
N. Frontiere,
S. Fuess,
L. Ge,
N. Gnedin,
S. Gottlieb
, et al. (29 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 ti…
▽ More
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of developing and using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on next-generation systems.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2016; v1 submitted 30 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Any Data, Any Time, Anywhere: Global Data Access for Science
Authors:
Kenneth Bloom,
Tommaso Boccali,
Brian Bockelman,
Daniel Bradley,
Sridhara Dasu,
Jeff Dost,
Federica Fanzago,
Igor Sfiligoi,
Alja Mrak Tadel,
Matevz Tadel,
Carl Vuosalo,
Frank Würthwein,
Avi Yagil,
Marian Zvada
Abstract:
Data access is key to science driven by distributed high-throughput computing (DHTC), an essential technology for many major research projects such as High Energy Physics (HEP) experiments. However, achieving efficient data access becomes quite difficult when many independent storage sites are involved because users are burdened with learning the intricacies of accessing each system and keeping ca…
▽ More
Data access is key to science driven by distributed high-throughput computing (DHTC), an essential technology for many major research projects such as High Energy Physics (HEP) experiments. However, achieving efficient data access becomes quite difficult when many independent storage sites are involved because users are burdened with learning the intricacies of accessing each system and keeping careful track of data location. We present an alternate approach: the Any Data, Any Time, Anywhere infrastructure. Combining several existing software products, AAA presents a global, unified view of storage systems - a "data federation," a global filesystem for software delivery, and a workflow management system. We present how one HEP experiment, the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS), is utilizing the AAA infrastructure and some simple performance metrics.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Heterogeneous High Throughput Scientific Computing with APM X-Gene and Intel Xeon Phi
Authors:
David Abdurachmanov,
Brian Bockelman,
Peter Elmer,
Giulio Eulisse,
Robert Knight,
Shahzad Muzaffar
Abstract:
Electrical power requirements will be a constraint on the future growth of Distributed High Throughput Computing (DHTC) as used by High Energy Physics. Performance-per-watt is a critical metric for the evaluation of computer architectures for cost- efficient computing. Additionally, future performance growth will come from heterogeneous, many-core, and high computing density platforms with special…
▽ More
Electrical power requirements will be a constraint on the future growth of Distributed High Throughput Computing (DHTC) as used by High Energy Physics. Performance-per-watt is a critical metric for the evaluation of computer architectures for cost- efficient computing. Additionally, future performance growth will come from heterogeneous, many-core, and high computing density platforms with specialized processors. In this paper, we examine the Intel Xeon Phi Many Integrated Cores (MIC) co-processor and Applied Micro X-Gene ARMv8 64-bit low-power server system-on-a-chip (SoC) solutions for scientific computing applications. We report our experience on software porting, performance and energy efficiency and evaluate the potential for use of such technologies in the context of distributed computing systems such as the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG).
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
