-
The ECFA Early-Career Researchers Panel: Report for the year 2023
Authors:
Julia Allen,
Bruno Alves,
Jan-Hendrik Arling,
Kamil Augsten,
Emanuele Bagnaschi,
Giovanni Benato,
Anna Bennecke,
Cecilia Borca,
Paulo Braz,
Lydia Brenner,
Jordy Degens,
Yannick Dengler,
Christina Dimitriadi,
Eleonora Diociaiuti,
Laurent Dufour,
Patrick Dunne,
Ozgur Etisken,
Silvia Ferrario Ravasio,
Nikolai Fomin,
Andrea Garcia Alonso,
Leif Gellersen,
Andreas Gsponer,
Tomas Herman,
Bojan Hiti,
Laura Huhta
, et al. (45 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The European Committee for Future Accelerators (ECFA) Early-Career Researcher (ECR) panel, which represents the interests of the ECR community to ECFA, presents in this document its initiatives and activities in the year 2023. This report summarises the process of the first big turnover in the panel composition at the start of 2023 and reports on the activities of the active working groups - eithe…
▽ More
The European Committee for Future Accelerators (ECFA) Early-Career Researcher (ECR) panel, which represents the interests of the ECR community to ECFA, presents in this document its initiatives and activities in the year 2023. This report summarises the process of the first big turnover in the panel composition at the start of 2023 and reports on the activities of the active working groups - either pursued from before or newly established. The overarching goal of the ECFA-ECR panel is to better understand and support the diverse interests of early-career researchers in the ECFA community and beyond.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
The LHCb upgrade I
Authors:
LHCb collaboration,
R. Aaij,
A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb,
C. Abellan Beteta,
F. Abudinén,
C. Achard,
T. Ackernley,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
P. Adlarson,
H. Afsharnia,
C. Agapopoulou,
C. A. Aidala,
Z. Ajaltouni,
S. Akar,
K. Akiba,
P. Albicocco,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
Z. Aliouche,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
R. Amalric,
S. Amato
, et al. (1298 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their select…
▽ More
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their selection in real time. The experiment's tracking system has been completely upgraded with a new pixel vertex detector, a silicon tracker upstream of the dipole magnet and three scintillating fibre tracking stations downstream of the magnet. The whole photon detection system of the RICH detectors has been renewed and the readout electronics of the calorimeter and muon systems have been fully overhauled. The first stage of the all-software trigger is implemented on a GPU farm. The output of the trigger provides a combination of totally reconstructed physics objects, such as tracks and vertices, ready for final analysis, and of entire events which need further offline reprocessing. This scheme required a complete revision of the computing model and rewriting of the experiment's software.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2024; v1 submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
A Comparison of CPU and GPU implementations for the LHCb Experiment Run 3 Trigger
Authors:
R. Aaij,
M. Adinolfi,
S. Aiola,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
S. Amato,
Y. Amhis,
F. Archilli,
M. Bala,
G. Bassi,
L. Bian,
M. P. Blago,
T. Boettcher,
A. Boldyrev,
S. Borghi,
A. Brea Rodriguez,
L. Calefice,
M. Calvo Gomez,
D. H. Cámpora Pérez,
A. Cardini,
M. Cattaneo,
V. Chobanova,
G. Ciezarek,
X. Cid Vidal
, et al. (135 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are fo…
▽ More
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are found to be viable. This document summarizes the performance and implementation details of these options, the outcome of which has led to the choice of the GPU-based implementation as the baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2022; v1 submitted 9 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Calibration and performance of the LHCb calorimeters in Run 1 and 2 at the LHC
Authors:
C. Abellán Beteta,
A. Alfonso Albero,
Y. Amhis,
S. Barsuk,
C. Beigbeder-Beau,
I. Belyaev,
R. Bonnefoy,
D. Breton,
O. Callot,
M. Calvo Gomez,
A. Camboni,
H. Chanal,
D. Charlet,
M. Chefdeville,
V. Coco,
E. Cogneras,
A. Comerma-Montells,
S. Coquereau,
O. Deschamps,
F. Domingo Bonal,
C. Drancourt,
O. Duarte,
N. Dumont Dayot,
R. Dzhelyadin,
V. Egorychev
, et al. (62 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The calibration and performance of the LHCb Calorimeter system in Run 1 and 2 at the LHC are described. After a brief description of the sub-detectors and of their role in the trigger, the calibration methods used for each part of the system are reviewed. The changes which occurred with the increase of beam energy in Run 2 are explained. The performances of the calorimetry for $γ$ and $π^0$ are de…
▽ More
The calibration and performance of the LHCb Calorimeter system in Run 1 and 2 at the LHC are described. After a brief description of the sub-detectors and of their role in the trigger, the calibration methods used for each part of the system are reviewed. The changes which occurred with the increase of beam energy in Run 2 are explained. The performances of the calorimetry for $γ$ and $π^0$ are detailed. A few results from collisions recorded at $\sqrt {s}$ = 7, 8 and 13 TeV are shown.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
HybridSeeding: A standalone track reconstruction algorithm for scintillating fibre tracker at LHCb
Authors:
Salvatore Aiola,
Yasmine Amhis,
Pierre Billoir,
Brij Kishor Jashal,
Louis Henry,
Arantza Oyanguren Campos,
Carla Marin Benito,
Francesco Polci,
Renato Quagliani,
Manuel Schiller,
Mengzhen Wang
Abstract:
We describe the Hybrid seeding, a standalone pattern recognition algorithm aiming at finding charged particle trajectories for the LHCb upgrade. A significant improvement to the charged particle reconstruction efficiency is accomplished by exploiting the knowledge of the LHCb magnetic field and the position of energy deposits in the scintillating fibre tracker detector. Moreover, we achieve a low…
▽ More
We describe the Hybrid seeding, a standalone pattern recognition algorithm aiming at finding charged particle trajectories for the LHCb upgrade. A significant improvement to the charged particle reconstruction efficiency is accomplished by exploiting the knowledge of the LHCb magnetic field and the position of energy deposits in the scintillating fibre tracker detector. Moreover, we achieve a low fake rate and a small contribution to the overall timing budget of the LHCb real-time data processing.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2020; v1 submitted 6 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Design and performance of the LHCb trigger and full real-time reconstruction in Run 2 of the LHC
Authors:
R. Aaij,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
S. Amerio,
L. Anderlini,
P. d'Argent,
A. Baranov,
W. Barter,
S. Benson,
D. Bobulska,
T. Boettcher,
S. Borghi,
E. E. Bowen,
L. Brarda,
C. Burr,
J. -P. Cachemiche,
M. Calvo Gomez,
M. Cattaneo,
H. Chanal,
M. Chapman,
M. Chebbi,
M. Chefdeville,
P. Ciambrone
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run…
▽ More
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run 2. We describe the design of the Run 2 trigger and real-time reconstruction, and present data-driven performance measurements for a representative sample of LHCb's physics programme.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2019; v1 submitted 27 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.