-
Active Eye Lens Dosimetry With Dosepix: Influence of Measurement Position and Lead Glass Shielding
Authors:
Leonie Ullmann,
Florian Beißer,
Rolf Behrens,
Stefan Funk,
Gerhard Hilgers,
Oliver Hupe,
Jürgen Roth,
Tom Tröltzsch,
Hayo Zutz,
Thilo Michel
Abstract:
In this work, the effect of the measurement position on measurements of $H_\text{p}(3)$ of a new active eye lens dosemeter prototype based on the Dosepix detector is examined. A comparison between measuring directly in front of the eye and measuring at the side of the head of an Alderson phantom showed no significant influence on the resulting $H_\text{p}(3)$ for different radiation qualities and…
▽ More
In this work, the effect of the measurement position on measurements of $H_\text{p}(3)$ of a new active eye lens dosemeter prototype based on the Dosepix detector is examined. A comparison between measuring directly in front of the eye and measuring at the side of the head of an Alderson phantom showed no significant influence on the resulting $H_\text{p}(3)$ for different radiation qualities and angles. In addition, to account for the absorption effect of radiation safety glasses, pieces of lead glass were attached to the front and side of the dosemeter. Corresponding effects and consequences for radiation protection measurements have been investigated by using a human like Alderson head phantom as well as thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) and the active eye lens dosemeter prototype. For specific angles, the radiation was able to bypass the radiation safety glasses and lead glass pieces, leading to an increase in the measured $H_\text{p}(3)$. Compared to TLDs behind radiation safety glasses, measurements with the lead glass shielded prototype resulted in lower values for $H_\text{p}(3)$. Furthermore, the results did not reproduce previous findings where larger dose values were found for Dosepix behind lead glass pieces than for the TLDs behind radiation safety glasses. A possible reason might be that the dimensions of the lead glass pieces are not representative of the radiation safety glasses in front of the eye but, ultimately, it is not yet clear what the main reason for the deviation is. Therefore, it is advisable to test the same methodology in future investigations with other eyewear models and lead glass pieces to investigate whether similar behaviors occur.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
-
Active Personal Eye Lens Dosimetry with the Hybrid Pixelated Dosepix Detector
Authors:
Florian Beißer,
Dennis Haag,
Rafael Ballabriga,
Rolf Behrens,
Michael Campbell,
Christian Fuhg,
Patrick Hufschmidt,
Oliver Hupe,
Carolin Kupillas,
Xavier Llopart,
Jürgen Roth,
Sebastian Schmidt,
Markus Schneider,
Lukas Tlustos,
Winnie Wong,
Hayo Zutz,
Thilo Michel,
Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics,
CERN,
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesantalt,
was with the Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics,
is now with Helene-Lange-Gymnasium,
was with the Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics,
is now with CodeCamp,
:
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Eye lens dosimetry has been an important field of research in the last decade. Dose measurements with a prototype of an active personal eye lens dosemeter based on the Dosepix detector are presented. The personal dose equivalent at $3\,$mm depth of soft tissue, $H_\text{p}(3)$, was measured in the center front of a water-filled cylinder phantom with a height and diameter of $20\,$cm. The energy de…
▽ More
Eye lens dosimetry has been an important field of research in the last decade. Dose measurements with a prototype of an active personal eye lens dosemeter based on the Dosepix detector are presented. The personal dose equivalent at $3\,$mm depth of soft tissue, $H_\text{p}(3)$, was measured in the center front of a water-filled cylinder phantom with a height and diameter of $20\,$cm. The energy dependence of the normalized response is investigated for mean photon energies between $12.4\,$keV and $248\,$keV for continuous reference radiation fields (N-series) according to ISO 4037. The response normalized to N-60 ($\overline{E}=47.9\,\text{keV}$) at $0^\circ$ angle of irradiation stays within the approval limits of IEC 61526 for angles of incidence between $-75^\circ$ and $+75^\circ$. Performance in pulsed photon fields was tested for varying dose rates from $0.1\,\frac{\text{Sv}}{\text{h}}$ up to $1000\,\frac{\text{Sv}}{\text{h}}$ and pulse durations from $1\,\text{ms}$ up to $10\,\text{s}$. The dose measurement works well within the approval limits (acc. to IEC 61526) up to $1\,\frac{\text{Sv}}{\text{h}}$. No significant influence of the pulse duration on the measured dose is found. Reproducibility measurements yield a coefficient of variation which does not exceed $1\,\%$ for two tested eye lens dosemeter prototypes.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2023; v1 submitted 9 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Personal Dosimetry in Direct Pulsed Photon Fields with the Dosepix Detector
Authors:
Dennis Haag,
Sebastian Schmidt,
Patrick Hufschmidt,
Gisela Anton,
Rafael Ballabriga,
Rolf Behrens,
Michael Campbell,
Franziska Eberle,
Christian Fuhg,
Oliver Hupe,
Xavier Llopart,
Jürgen Roth,
Lukas Tlustos,
Winnie Wong,
Hayo Zutz,
Thilo Michel
Abstract:
First investigations regarding dosimetric properties of the hybrid, pixelated, photon-counting Dosepix detector in the direct beam of a pulsed photon field (RQR8) for the personal dose equivalent $H\mathrm{_p(10)}$ are presented. The influence quantities such as pulse duration and dose rate were varied, and their responses were compared to the legal limits provided in PTB-A 23.2. The variation of…
▽ More
First investigations regarding dosimetric properties of the hybrid, pixelated, photon-counting Dosepix detector in the direct beam of a pulsed photon field (RQR8) for the personal dose equivalent $H\mathrm{_p(10)}$ are presented. The influence quantities such as pulse duration and dose rate were varied, and their responses were compared to the legal limits provided in PTB-A 23.2. The variation of pulse duration at a nearly constant dose rate of about 3.7$\,$Sv/h shows a flat response around 1.0 from 3.6$\,$s down to 2$\,$ms. A response close to 1.0 is achieved for dose rates from 0.07$\,$Sv/h to 35$\,$Sv/h for both pixel sizes. Above this dose rate, the large pixels (220$\,μ$m edge length) are below the lower limit. The small pixels (55$\,μ$m edge length) stay within limits up to 704$\,$Sv/h. The count rate linearity is compared to previous results, confirming the saturating count rate for high dose rates.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2022; v1 submitted 12 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
