Simulation of Shattered Pellet Injections with Plasmoid Drifts in ASDEX Upgrade and ITER
Authors:
O. Vallhagen,
L. Antonsson,
P. Halldestam,
G. Papp,
P. Heinrich,
A. Patel,
M. Hoppe,
L. Votta,
the ASDEX Upgrade Team,
the EUROfusion Tokamak Exploitation Team
Abstract:
Pellet injection is an important means to fuel and control discharges and mitigate disruptions in reactor-scale fusion devices. To accurately assess the efficiency of these applications, it is necessary to account for the drift of the ablated material toward the low-field side. In this study, we have implemented a semi-analytical model for ablation cloud drifts in the numerical disruption modellin…
▽ More
Pellet injection is an important means to fuel and control discharges and mitigate disruptions in reactor-scale fusion devices. To accurately assess the efficiency of these applications, it is necessary to account for the drift of the ablated material toward the low-field side. In this study, we have implemented a semi-analytical model for ablation cloud drifts in the numerical disruption modelling tool DREAM. We show that this model is capable of reproducing the density evolution in shattered pellet injection (SPI) experiments in ASDEX Upgrade, for model parameters within the expected range. The model is then used to investigate the prospects for disruption mitigation by staggered SPIs in 15 MA DT H-mode ITER scenarios. We find that the drifts may decrease the assimilation of pure deuterium SPIs by about an order of magnitude, which may be important to consider when designing the disruption mitigation scheme in ITER. The ITER scenarios studied here generally result in similar multi-MA runaway electron (RE) currents, regardless of the drift assumptions, but the effect of the drift is larger in situations with a fast and early thermal quench. The RE current may also be more strongly affected by the drift losses when accounting for RE losses caused by the vertical plasma motion.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
Fluid and kinetic studies of tokamak disruptions using Bayesian optimization
Authors:
Ida Ekmark,
Mathias Hoppe,
Tünde Fülöp,
Patrik Jansson,
Liam Antonsson,
Oskar Vallhagen,
Istvan Pusztai
Abstract:
When simulating runaway electron dynamics in tokamak disruptions, fluid models with lower numerical cost are often preferred to more accurate kinetic models. The aim of this work is to compare fluid and kinetic simulations of a large variety of different disruption scenarios in ITER. We consider both non-activated and activated scenarios; for the latter we derive and implement kinetic sources for…
▽ More
When simulating runaway electron dynamics in tokamak disruptions, fluid models with lower numerical cost are often preferred to more accurate kinetic models. The aim of this work is to compare fluid and kinetic simulations of a large variety of different disruption scenarios in ITER. We consider both non-activated and activated scenarios; for the latter we derive and implement kinetic sources for the Compton scattering and tritium beta decay runaway electron generation mechanisms in our simulation tool DREAM [M. Hoppe et al 2021 Comp. Phys. Commun. 268, 108098]. To achieve a diverse set of disruption scenarios, Bayesian optimization is used to explore a range of massive material injection densities for deuterium and neon. The cost function is designed to distinguish between successful and unsuccessful disruption mitigation based on the runaway current, current quench time and transported fraction of the heat loss. In the non-activated scenarios, we find that fluid and kinetic disruption simulations can have significantly different runaway electron dynamics, due to an overestimation of the runaway seed by the fluid model. The primary cause of this is that the fluid hot-tail generation model neglects superthermal electron transport losses during the thermal quench. In the activated scenarios, the fluid and kinetic models give similar predictions, which can be explained by the significant influence of the activated sources on the RE dynamics and the seed.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2024; v1 submitted 8 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
