-
Two restrictions in the theories that include $G(t)$ and $c(t)$ varying with time
Authors:
Màrius Josep Fullana i Alfonso,
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Much work has been done taking into account the possibility that the gravitational {\it constant} $G$ may vary with cosmological time $t$ (or with the cosmological scale factor $a(t)$). The same may be said about the speed of light $c$. We present here two important remarks on these subject. These remarks include $G(t)$ and $c(t)$ varying with time with the restriction…
▽ More
Much work has been done taking into account the possibility that the gravitational {\it constant} $G$ may vary with cosmological time $t$ (or with the cosmological scale factor $a(t)$). The same may be said about the speed of light $c$. We present here two important remarks on these subject. These remarks include $G(t)$ and $c(t)$ varying with time with the restriction $8 πG / c^4 = \hbox{constant}$
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2015.
-
Fundamental Principle of Information-to-Energy Conversion
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
The equivalence of 1 bit of information to entropy was given by Landauer in 1961 as kln2, k the Boltzmann constant. Erasing information implies heat dissipation and the energy of 1 bit would then be (the Landauers limit) kT ln 2, T being the ambient temperature. From a quantum-cosmological point of view the minimum quantum of energy in the universe corresponds today to a temperature of 10^(-29) de…
▽ More
The equivalence of 1 bit of information to entropy was given by Landauer in 1961 as kln2, k the Boltzmann constant. Erasing information implies heat dissipation and the energy of 1 bit would then be (the Landauers limit) kT ln 2, T being the ambient temperature. From a quantum-cosmological point of view the minimum quantum of energy in the universe corresponds today to a temperature of 10^(-29) degrees K, probably forming a cosmic background of a Bose condensate [1]. Then, the bit with minimum energy today in the Universe is a quantum of energy 10^(-45)ergs, with an equivalent mass of 10^(-66)g. Low temperature implies low energy per bit and, of course, this is the way for faster and less energy dissipating computing devices. Our conjecture is this: the possibility of a future access to the CBBC (a coupling/channeling?) would mean a huge jump in the performance of these devices.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2013;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Cosmic Background Bose Condensation (CBBC)
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus,
Màrius Josep Fullana i Alfonso
Abstract:
Degeneracy effects for bosons are more important for smaller particle mass, smaller temperature and higher number density. Bose condensation requires that particles be in the same lowest energy quantum state. We propose a cosmic background Bose condensation, present everywhere, whith its particles having the lowest quantum energy state, $\hbar c / λ$, with $λ$ about the size of the visible univers…
▽ More
Degeneracy effects for bosons are more important for smaller particle mass, smaller temperature and higher number density. Bose condensation requires that particles be in the same lowest energy quantum state. We propose a cosmic background Bose condensation, present everywhere, whith its particles having the lowest quantum energy state, $\hbar c / λ$, with $λ$ about the size of the visible universe, and therefore unlocalized. This we identify with the quantum of the self gravitational potential energy of any particle, and with the bit of information of minimum energy. The entropy of the universe ($\sim 10^{122} \ bits$) has the highest number density ($ \sim 10^{36} \ bits / cm^3$) of particles inside the visible universe, the smallest mass, $\sim 10^{-66} g$, and the smallest temperature, $\sim 10^{-29} K$. Therefore it is the best candidate for a Cosmic Background Bose Condensation (CBBC), a completely calmed fluid, with no viscosity, in a superfluidity state, and possibly responsible for the expansion of the universe.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
-
Bekenstein and the Holographic Principle: Upper bounds for Entropy
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus,
Màrius Josep Fullana i Alfonso
Abstract:
Using the Bekenstein upper bound for the ratio of the entropy $S$ of any bounded system, with energy $E = Mc^2$ and effective size $R$, to its energy $E$ i.e. $S/E < 2πk R/\hbar c$, we combine it with the holographic principle (HP) bound ('t Hooft and Susskind) which is $S \le πk c^3R^2/\hbar G$. We find that, if both bounds are identical, such bounded system is a black hole (BH). For a system tha…
▽ More
Using the Bekenstein upper bound for the ratio of the entropy $S$ of any bounded system, with energy $E = Mc^2$ and effective size $R$, to its energy $E$ i.e. $S/E < 2πk R/\hbar c$, we combine it with the holographic principle (HP) bound ('t Hooft and Susskind) which is $S \le πk c^3R^2/\hbar G$. We find that, if both bounds are identical, such bounded system is a black hole (BH). For a system that is not a BH the two upper bounds are different. The entropy of the system must obey the lowest bound. If the bounds are proportional, the result is the proportionality between the mass M of the system and its effective size $R$. When the constant of proportionality is $2G/c^2$ the system in question is a BH, and the two bounds are identical. We analyze the case for a universe. Then the universe is a BH in the sense that its mass $M$ and its Hubble size $R \approx ct$, t the age of the universe, follow the Schwarzschild relation $2GM/c^2 = R$. Finally, for a BH, the Hawking and Unruh temperatures are the same. Applying this to a universe they define the quantum of mass $\sim 10^{-66} g$ for our universe.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
-
Seeable universe and its accelerated expansion: an observational test
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus,
Màrius Josep Fullana i Alfonso
Abstract:
From the equivalence principle, one gets the strength of the gravitational effect of a mass $M$ on the metric at position r from it. It is proportional to the dimensionless parameter $β^2 = 2GM/rc^2$, which normally is $<< 1$. Here $G$ is the gravitational constant, $M$ the mass of the gravitating body, $r$ the position of the metric from the gravitating body and $c$ the speed of light. The seeabl…
▽ More
From the equivalence principle, one gets the strength of the gravitational effect of a mass $M$ on the metric at position r from it. It is proportional to the dimensionless parameter $β^2 = 2GM/rc^2$, which normally is $<< 1$. Here $G$ is the gravitational constant, $M$ the mass of the gravitating body, $r$ the position of the metric from the gravitating body and $c$ the speed of light. The seeable universe is the sphere, with center at the observer, having a size such that it shall contain all light emitted within it. For this to occur one can impose that the gravitational effect on the velocity of light at $r$ is zero for the radial component, and non zero for the tangential one. Light is then trapped. The condition is given by the equality $R_g = 2GM/c^2$, where $R_g$ represents the radius of the {\it seeable} universe. It is the gravitational radius of the mass $M$. The result has been presented elsewhere as the condition for the universe to be treated as a black hole. According to present observations, for the case of our universe taken as flat ($k = 0$), and the equation of state as $p = - ρc^2$, we prove here from the Einstein's cosmological equations that the universe is expanding in an accelerated way as $t^2$, a constant acceleration as has been observed. This implies that the gravitational radius of the universe (at the event horizon) expands as $t^2$. Taking $c$ as constant, observing the galaxies deep in space this means deep in time as $ct$, linear. Then, far away galaxies from the observer that we see today will disappear in time as they get out of the distance ct that is $< R_g$. The accelerated expanding vacuum will drag them out of sight. This may be a valid test for the present ideas in cosmology. Previous calculations are here halved by our results.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2013; v1 submitted 30 August, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
-
Expanding versus non expanding universe
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
In cosmology the number of scientists using the framework of an expanding universe is very high. This model, the big-bang, is now overwhelmingly present in almost all aspects of society. It is the main stream cosmology of today. A small number of scientists are researching on the possibility of a non-expanding universe. The existence of these two groups, one very large and the other very small, is…
▽ More
In cosmology the number of scientists using the framework of an expanding universe is very high. This model, the big-bang, is now overwhelmingly present in almost all aspects of society. It is the main stream cosmology of today. A small number of scientists are researching on the possibility of a non-expanding universe. The existence of these two groups, one very large and the other very small, is a good proof of the use of the scientific method: it does not drive to an absolute certainty. All models have to be permanently validated, falsified. Ockham's razor, a powerful philosophical tool, will probably change the amount of scientists working in each of these groups. We present here a model where a big-bang is unnecessary. It ends, in a finite time, in a second INFLATION, or a disaggregation to infinity. We also discuss the possibilities of a non-expanding universe model. Only a few references will be cited, mainly concerned with our own work in the past, thus purposely avoiding citing the many thousands of professionals working in this field.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Underpinning the universe: its scales, holography and fractality
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus,
Marius Josep Fullana i Alfonso
Abstract:
We expand on the general concept of a universe. We identify physics as a unit applied to a universe. Then we generalize the concept of a quantum black hole, and apply it to the unit of a universe. We find that only one parameter, the Pin, is needed to define all its physical properties. Here we present three significant quantum black holes, three scales: Planck's, sub- Planck and our own universe…
▽ More
We expand on the general concept of a universe. We identify physics as a unit applied to a universe. Then we generalize the concept of a quantum black hole, and apply it to the unit of a universe. We find that only one parameter, the Pin, is needed to define all its physical properties. Here we present three significant quantum black holes, three scales: Planck's, sub- Planck and our own universe as a whole. Then we revise the holographic and fractal properties, and propose a sequential growing process to explain the evolution and the basic structure of our universe.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2012;
originally announced January 2012.
-
Quantization of the universe as a black hole
Authors:
Màrius Josep Fullana i Alfonso,
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
It has been shown that black holes can be quantized by using Bohr's idea of quantizing the motion of an electron inside the atom. We apply these ideas to the universe as a whole. This approach reinforces the suggestion that it may be a way to unify gravity with quantum theory.
It has been shown that black holes can be quantized by using Bohr's idea of quantizing the motion of an electron inside the atom. We apply these ideas to the universe as a whole. This approach reinforces the suggestion that it may be a way to unify gravity with quantum theory.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2011;
originally announced November 2011.
-
On the nature of the outward pressure in the Universe (II)
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus,
David Sanchez Aguado
Abstract:
In Plasma Physics the concept of the Debye length \lambdaD is defined. This length gives the size of a volume such that from outside it the inside electrical charges, positive and negative, electrically screen each other. Given the enormous electrical potential that would develop with no screening, we conjecture that the size of the Universe R, as given by the speed of light c and its age t, R \ap…
▽ More
In Plasma Physics the concept of the Debye length \lambdaD is defined. This length gives the size of a volume such that from outside it the inside electrical charges, positive and negative, electrically screen each other. Given the enormous electrical potential that would develop with no screening, we conjecture that the size of the Universe R, as given by the speed of light c and its age t, R \approx ct, cannot be very much lower than the Debye length. It turns out that it is about 1/3 \lambdaD. Hence inside the volume of size ct there is an otward electrical pressure due to the lack of complete electrical screening of the charges. The Universe does not collapse under its own gravitational attraction, and we present the possibility that this is due to the effect of the repulsive forces of these electrical charges. May be there is too some other mechanism. There is strong evidence today in support of the idea that space is not only expanding but doing it in an accelerated way. We find a large number, 5x1060 that converts Planck's unit of mass, length, time, charge e and angular momentum \hbar, into the mass M, size ct, age t, total charge Q and (possibly) angular momentum of the Universe in a scale like way. It defines a black hole of mass M \approx 1056gr., size 1028 cm., characteristic time 5x1017sec, charge Q \approx 3.5 x1061e and maximum angular momentum \Hbar \approx 10121 \hbar which we identify with our Universe. The solution to the Einstein cosmological equations, including an electrical pressure due to the charge Q, is in agreement with the value of the cosmological parameters currently reported. An argument in favour of a hidden value of the curvature parameter Ωk \approx 1 is also presented here.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
-
Universality of the self gravitational potential energy of any fundamental particle
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Using the relation proposed by Weinberg in 1972, combining quantum and cosmological parameters, we prove that the self gravitational potential energy of any fundamental particle is a quantum, with physical properties independent of the mass of the particle. It is a universal quantum of gravitational energy, and its physical properties depend only on the cosmological scale factor R and the physical…
▽ More
Using the relation proposed by Weinberg in 1972, combining quantum and cosmological parameters, we prove that the self gravitational potential energy of any fundamental particle is a quantum, with physical properties independent of the mass of the particle. It is a universal quantum of gravitational energy, and its physical properties depend only on the cosmological scale factor R and the physical constants \hbar and c. We propose a modification of the Weinberg's relation, keeping the same numerical value, but substituting the cosmological parameter H/c by 1/R.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
Quantum gravity and information theories linked by the physical properties of the bit
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Quantum gravity, and quantum cosmology, is not yet a complete nor consistent theory. One of the reasons for this is that the identification of the quantum of gravity is still very elusive. Here we show that the quantum of gravity is the minimum quantum of energy in nature, and we identify its physical properties. On the other hand, information theory has at its base the unit of information, the bi…
▽ More
Quantum gravity, and quantum cosmology, is not yet a complete nor consistent theory. One of the reasons for this is that the identification of the quantum of gravity is still very elusive. Here we show that the quantum of gravity is the minimum quantum of energy in nature, and we identify its physical properties. On the other hand, information theory has at its base the unit of information, the bit, and relies upon this entity that has no clear or definitely identified physical properties either. Here we prove that the bit has the absolute minimum of energy, and that it is the quantum of gravitational potential energy. Therefore the physics of the quantum of gravity and the physics of the quantum of information are parallel. We identify the entropy of 1 bit with the Boltzmann constant k, 61 orders of magnitude below the Planck scale as of today. It is the unit of entropy. These findings move forward the state of the art of two very important fields: quantum gravity and information theories. A new insight is also given for information entropy. We obtain these results thanks to the combination of two important contributions to science from the past: Weinberg relation and the Bekenstein maximum information limit.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2011;
originally announced May 2011.
-
Evidence for a disaggregation of the universe
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Combining the kinematical definitions of the two dimensionless parameters, the deceleration q(x) and the Hubble t0H(x), we get a differential equation (where x = t/t0 is the age of the universe relative to its present value t0). First integration gives the function H(x). The present values of the Hubble parameter H(1) [approximately t0H(1) \approx 1], and the deceleration parameter [approximately…
▽ More
Combining the kinematical definitions of the two dimensionless parameters, the deceleration q(x) and the Hubble t0H(x), we get a differential equation (where x = t/t0 is the age of the universe relative to its present value t0). First integration gives the function H(x). The present values of the Hubble parameter H(1) [approximately t0H(1) \approx 1], and the deceleration parameter [approximately q(1)\approx - 0.5], determine the function H(x). A second integration gives the cosmological scale factor a(x). Differentiation of a(x) gives the speed of expansion of the universe. The evolution of the universe that results from our approach is: an initial extremely fast exponential expansion (inflation), followed by an almost linear expansion (first decelerated, and later accelerated). For the future, at approximately t \approx 3t0 there is a final exponential expansion, a second inflation that produces a disaggregation of the universe to infinity. We find the necessary and sufficient conditions for this disaggregation to occur. The precise value of the final age is given only with one parameter: the present value of the deceleration parameter q(1) \approx - 0.5]. This emerging picture of the history of the universe represents an important challenge, an opportunity for the immediate research on the Universe. These conclusions have been elaborated without the use of any particular cosmological model of the universe.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2011;
originally announced April 2011.
-
Cosmology, Holography, the Brain and the Quantum Vacuum
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Cosmology, as a science, started at the beginning of the last century with the advent of the Einstein cosmological equations. Based on these equations, the present main stream cosmological model is the well known big-bang, this name unwillingly coined by Fred Hoyle many years ago. Relatively recent additions to this model have been inflation, dark matter and dark energy. We present a smoothly beha…
▽ More
Cosmology, as a science, started at the beginning of the last century with the advent of the Einstein cosmological equations. Based on these equations, the present main stream cosmological model is the well known big-bang, this name unwillingly coined by Fred Hoyle many years ago. Relatively recent additions to this model have been inflation, dark matter and dark energy. We present a smoothly behaved new cosmological model that mainly takes into account the dark part of the Universe. We consider it as the background frame, the substrate, of what we see. The inclusion of the holographic principle clarifies the entropy problem that we also apply to the human brain. We take it as an engineering information center. Finally, the inclusion of the quantum vacuum in this scene creates an important challenge, an opportunity for future research in the knowledge of the Universe.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2011; v1 submitted 1 February, 2011;
originally announced February 2011.
-
Entropy, Gravity and the Mass-Boom
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Verlinde presents the gravitational force as due to gradients of entropy, an emergent force, with far reaching consequences. Using the Hawking-Bekenstein entropy formulation, we arrive at the conclusion that the Mass-Boom effect, presented elsewhere, forces the entropy of the universe to increase. Then the Mass-Boom is directly related to the existence of gravity. The principle of Mach implies tha…
▽ More
Verlinde presents the gravitational force as due to gradients of entropy, an emergent force, with far reaching consequences. Using the Hawking-Bekenstein entropy formulation, we arrive at the conclusion that the Mass-Boom effect, presented elsewhere, forces the entropy of the universe to increase. Then the Mass-Boom is directly related to the existence of gravity. The principle of Mach implies that the Mass-Boom is responsible for the expansion of the universe. Thus, the Mass-Boom effect is a necessary condition for: 1) the increase of entropy with time, 2) the existence of gravity, and 3) for the expansion of the universe. The universe seems to initially appear and grow out of polarization: positive mass-boom (energy) versus negative gravitational potential energy boom, adding both always to zero. Polarization is then the cause of creation and evolution of the universe.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2010;
originally announced September 2010.
-
Sources of cosmic microwave radiation and dark matter identified: millimeter black holes (m.b.h.)
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus,
Marius Josep Fullana i Alfonso
Abstract:
The universe is filled with blackbody millimeter radiation (CMBR), temperature 2.7° Kelvin[1]. Big-bang cosmology explains this by the initial thermalization of photons scattered by electrons[2]. This explanation requires ad hoc previous existence of photons and thermal electrons. On the other hand most of the mass of the universe is unknown dark matter3. It explains anomalous dynamical properties…
▽ More
The universe is filled with blackbody millimeter radiation (CMBR), temperature 2.7° Kelvin[1]. Big-bang cosmology explains this by the initial thermalization of photons scattered by electrons[2]. This explanation requires ad hoc previous existence of photons and thermal electrons. On the other hand most of the mass of the universe is unknown dark matter3. It explains anomalous dynamical properties, like that of stars in galaxies[4,5,6] . Alternatively the anomalies have been explained by adjusting and modifying well known laws ("Modified Newtonian dynamics"[7]). Here we show that millimeter black holes (m.b.h.) explain both: the background radiation, by its partial "evaporation", and the dark matter. Black holes emit blackbody radiation (Hawking[8] evaporation), and this is what is observed in the CMBR. Millimeter size black holes emit blackbody radiation at a temperature of 2.7° Kelvin, and this is the resulting CMBR . Partial evaporation of ~10^30 m.b.h. gives the observed background field of photons being emitted and absorbed at the same rate by the m.b.h. The number of photons is constant, as observed. Their temperature decreases with time because the mass of the m.b.h. (and therefore its size) increases with time (the mass-boom effect[9]). The total mass of the m.b.h. is the dark matter. Hence dark matter is not so "dark" after all. Two important cosmological items are here identified by only one source: millimeter black holes.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2010;
originally announced April 2010.
-
Non-expanding universe: a cosmological system of units
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
The product of two empirical constants, the dimensionless fine structure constant and the von Klitzing constant (an electrical resistance), turns out to be an exact dimensionless number. Then the accuracy and cosmological time variation (if any) of these two constants are tied. Also this product defines a natural unit of electrical resistance, the inverse of a quantum of conductance. When the sp…
▽ More
The product of two empirical constants, the dimensionless fine structure constant and the von Klitzing constant (an electrical resistance), turns out to be an exact dimensionless number. Then the accuracy and cosmological time variation (if any) of these two constants are tied. Also this product defines a natural unit of electrical resistance, the inverse of a quantum of conductance. When the speed of light c is taken away from the fine structure constant, as has been shown elsewhere, its constancy implies the constancy of the ratio e2/h (the inverse of the von Klitzing constant), e the charge of the electron and h Planck constant. This forces the charge of the electron e to be constant as long as the action h (an angular momentum) is a true constant too. From the constancy of the Rydberg constant the Compton wavelength, h/mc, is then a true constant and consequently there is no expansion at the quantum mechanical level. The momentum mc is also a true constant and then general relativity predicts that the universe is not expanding, as shown elsewhere. The time variation of the speed of light explains the observed Hubble red shift. And there is a mass-boom effect. From this a coherent cosmological system of constant units can be defined.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2010;
originally announced January 2010.
-
The case for the Universe to be a quantum black hole
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
We present a necessary and sufficient condition for an object of any mass m to be a quantum black hole (q.b.h.): The product of the cosmological constant lambda and the Planck constant h, lambda and h corresponding to the scale defined by this q.b.h., must be of order one in a certain universal system of units. In this system the numerical values known for lambda are of order one in cosmology an…
▽ More
We present a necessary and sufficient condition for an object of any mass m to be a quantum black hole (q.b.h.): The product of the cosmological constant lambda and the Planck constant h, lambda and h corresponding to the scale defined by this q.b.h., must be of order one in a certain universal system of units. In this system the numerical values known for lambda are of order one in cosmology and about 10^122 for Planck scale. Proving that in this system the value of the cosmological h is of order one, while the value of h for the Planck scale is about 10^(-122), both scales satisfy the condition to be a q.b.h., i.e. lambda x h of order 1. In this sense the Universe is a q.b.h..We suggest that these objects, being q.b.h., give us the linkage between thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, electromagnetism and general relativity, at least for the scale of a closed Universe and for the Planck scale. A mathematical transformation may refer these scales as corresponding to infinity (our universe) and zero (Planck universe), in a scale relativity sense.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2009;
originally announced December 2009.
-
The case for a non-expanding universe
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
We present the results of two empirical constancies: the fine structure constant and the Rydberg constant. When the speed of light c is taken away from the fine structure constant, as shown elsewhere, this constancy implies the constancy of the ratio e^2/h, e the charge of the electron and h Planck constant. This forces the charge of the electron e to be constant as long as the action h (an angu…
▽ More
We present the results of two empirical constancies: the fine structure constant and the Rydberg constant. When the speed of light c is taken away from the fine structure constant, as shown elsewhere, this constancy implies the constancy of the ratio e^2/h, e the charge of the electron and h Planck constant. This forces the charge of the electron e to be constant as long as the action h (an angular momentum) is a true constant too. Then the constancy of the Rydberg expression implies that the momentum mc is also a true constant. This is just the second law of Newton. The Compton wavelength, h/mc, is then a true constant and there is no expansion at the quantum mechanical level. General relativity then predicts that the universe is not expanding. It is the only solution for cosmology. The time variation of the speed of light explains the observed red shift.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2009;
originally announced August 2009.
-
Fractal universe and the speed of light: Revision of the universal constants
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
We apply the property of selfsimilarity that corresponds to the concept of a fractal universe, to the dimension of time. It follows that any interval of time, given by any tick of any clock, is proportional to the age of the universe. The fractality of time gives the fractality of space and mass. First consequence is that the speed of light decreases inversely proportional to time, same as the H…
▽ More
We apply the property of selfsimilarity that corresponds to the concept of a fractal universe, to the dimension of time. It follows that any interval of time, given by any tick of any clock, is proportional to the age of the universe. The fractality of time gives the fractality of space and mass. First consequence is that the speed of light decreases inversely proportional to time, same as the Hubble parameter. We then revise the universal constants and, at the cosmological scale, they are all of order one, as Dirac proposed. We find three different scales, each one separated by a factor of about 5x10^60: the universe, the Planck scale and what we call the sub Planck scale. Integration of the Einstein cosmological equations, for this fractal universe, gives the solution of a non-expanding universe with the present value of the observed numerical parameters. The red shift measured from the distant galaxies is interpreted here as due to the decreasing speed of light in a fractal universe.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2009;
originally announced May 2009.
-
On the nature of the outward pressure in the Universe
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Plasma Physics defines the concept of the Debye length. Given the enormous electrical potential that would develop with no screening, we conjecture that the size of the Universe,as given by the speed of light c and its age t, ct, cannot be very much lower than the Debye length. The Debye length of the Universe must be of the order of its size ct.It turns out that it is about 6 times larger. Henc…
▽ More
Plasma Physics defines the concept of the Debye length. Given the enormous electrical potential that would develop with no screening, we conjecture that the size of the Universe,as given by the speed of light c and its age t, ct, cannot be very much lower than the Debye length. The Debye length of the Universe must be of the order of its size ct.It turns out that it is about 6 times larger. Hence inside the volume of size ct there is an outward electrical pressure due to the lack of complete screening of the electrical charges. We suggest that these charges are related to the vacuum fluctuations. To the question of why the Universe does not collapse under its own gravitational attraction we analyze the possibility to answer this by the effect of the repulsive forces of these electrical charges. Evidence in support of the idea that space is not expanding is growing more and more in the scientific literature. As a frame of work we consider the model of a constant size Universe that implies a constant equilibrium between the gravitational (GM2/R2) and the electrical forces (Q2/R2). We find a large number, 5x10^60 that converts Planck units of mass, length, time, charge e and angular momentum h, into the mass M, size ct, age t, total charge Q and angular momentum of the Universe as in a scale-like way. It defines a black hole of mass M 10^56gr., size 10^28 cm., characteristic time 5x10^17sec, charge Q 3.3x10^60 e and maximum angular momentum H 10^120 h which is our Universe. We are inside it, a part of it. The solution to the Einstein cosmological equations, including an electrical pressure due to the charge Q, is in agreement with the value of the cosmological parameters currently reported.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2009;
originally announced March 2009.
-
Artificial contradiction between cosmology and particle physics: the lambda problem
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
It is shown that the usual choice of units obtained by taking G = c = Planck constant = 1, giving the Planck units of mass, length and time, introduces an artificial contradiction between cosmology and particle physics: the lambda problem that we associate with Planck constant. We note that the choice of Planck constant = 1 does not correspond to the scale of quantum physics. For this scale we p…
▽ More
It is shown that the usual choice of units obtained by taking G = c = Planck constant = 1, giving the Planck units of mass, length and time, introduces an artificial contradiction between cosmology and particle physics: the lambda problem that we associate with Planck constant. We note that the choice of Planck constant = 1 does not correspond to the scale of quantum physics. For this scale we prove that the correct value is Planck constant \hbar; 1/10^122, while the choice of Planck constant = 1 corresponds to the cosmological scale. This is due to the scale factor of 10^61 that converts the Planck scale to the cosmological scale. By choosing the ratio G/c^3 = constant = 1, which includes the choice G = c = 1, and the momentum conservation mc = constant, we preserve the derivation of the Einstein field equations from the action principle. Then the product Gm/c^2 = rg, the gravitational radius of m, is constant. For a quantum black hole we prove that Planck constant \hbar; rg^2 \hbar; (mc)^2. We also prove that the product lambda x Planck constant is a general constant of order one, for any scale. The cosmological scale implies lambda \hbar; Planck constant \hbar; 1, while the Planck scale gives lambda \hbar; 1/Planck constant \hbar; 10^122. This explains the lambda problem. We get two scales: the cosmological quantum black hole (QBH), size Λ; 10^28 cm, and the quantum black hole (qbh) that includes the fundamental particles scale, size Λ; 10^-13 cm, as well as the Planck scale, size Λ; 10^-33 cm.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2009; v1 submitted 24 November, 2008;
originally announced November 2008.
-
Three findings to model a quantum-gravitational theory
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
In 1967 Zeldovich expressed the cosmological constant lambda in terms of G, m and h, the gravitational constant, the mass of a fundamental particle and Plancks constant. In 1972 Weinberg expressed m in terms of h, G, the speed of light c and the Hubble parameter H. We proved that both expressions are identical. We also found proportionality between c and H. The critical mass balancing the outwar…
▽ More
In 1967 Zeldovich expressed the cosmological constant lambda in terms of G, m and h, the gravitational constant, the mass of a fundamental particle and Plancks constant. In 1972 Weinberg expressed m in terms of h, G, the speed of light c and the Hubble parameter H. We proved that both expressions are identical. We also found proportionality between c and H. The critical mass balancing the outward quantum mechanical spreading of the wave function, and its inward gravitational collapse, has been recently estimated. We identify this mass with Zeldovich and Weinberg mass. A semi classical gravity model is reinforced and provides an insight for the modelling of a quantum-gravitational theory. The time evolution of the peak probability density for a free particle, a wave function initially filling the whole Universe, explains the later geometrical properties of the fundamental particles. We prove that they end up acquiring a constant size given by their Compton wavelength. The size of the fundamental particles, as well as their mass, is explained. The three findings converge: Newton laws of motion and gravitation, while explaining Zeldovich and Weinberg relations, also define the mass and size of the fundamental particles when using the Schrodinger-Newton equation.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2008; v1 submitted 10 July, 2008;
originally announced July 2008.
-
Structure of the Universe: Generalization of Weinberg relation
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Weinberg relation can be explained by Newton laws. It can also be transformed into a relation between a gravitational cross section area, associated to a gravitational mass m, and the product of two gravitational radii corresponding to the mass m and to the mass M of the Universe. Using a physical similarity process we propose a convective cascade mechanism to explain the structures present in t…
▽ More
Weinberg relation can be explained by Newton laws. It can also be transformed into a relation between a gravitational cross section area, associated to a gravitational mass m, and the product of two gravitational radii corresponding to the mass m and to the mass M of the Universe. Using a physical similarity process we propose a convective cascade mechanism to explain the structures present in the Universe. The proposal includes the vacuum fluctuations as the heating source for convection to take place. The fundamental Rayleigh number is used with a value of 1100, as in the case of the granules observed in the sun photosphere. Computer simulations results give structures that resemble a configuration of the type of the Benard cells. We present the similarity of our results with the actual structures in the Universe (masses and sizes).
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2008;
originally announced May 2008.
-
Zeldovich Lambda and Weinberg Relation: An Explanation for the Cosmological Coincidences
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
In 1937 Dirac proposed the large number hypothesis (LNH). The idea was to explain that these numbers were large because the Universe is old. A time variation of certain constants was assumed. So far, no experimental evidence has significantly supported this time variation. Here we present a simplified cosmological model. We propose a new cosmological system of units, including a cosmological Pla…
▽ More
In 1937 Dirac proposed the large number hypothesis (LNH). The idea was to explain that these numbers were large because the Universe is old. A time variation of certain constants was assumed. So far, no experimental evidence has significantly supported this time variation. Here we present a simplified cosmological model. We propose a new cosmological system of units, including a cosmological Planck constant that absorbs the well known large number 10120. With this new Planck constant no large numbers appear at the cosmological level. They appear at lower levels, e.g. at the quantum world. We note here that Zeldovich formula, for the cosmological constant, is equivalent to the Weinberg relation. The immediate conclusion is that the speed of light c must be proportional to the Hubble parameter H, and therefore decrease with time. We find that the gravitational radius of the Universe and its size are one and the same constant (Mach principle). The usual cosmological omega parameters for mass, lambda and curvature turn out to be all constants of order one. The anthropic principle is not necessary in this theory. It is shown that a factor of 1061converts in this theory a Planck fluctuation (a quantum black hole) into a cosmological quantum black hole: the Universe today. General relativity and quantum mechanics give the same local solution of an expanding Universe with the law const. t. This constant is just the speed of light today. Then the Hubble parameter is exactly H = 1/t.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2008; v1 submitted 9 March, 2008;
originally announced March 2008.
-
Cosmology with New Astrophysical Constants
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
It is shown that Einstein field equations give two solutions for cosmology. The first one is the standard well known representative of the present status of cosmology. We identify it with the local point of view of a flat Universe with the values for the cosmological omega parameters (k = 0, lambda = 2/3, m = 1/3). The second one is a new one that we identify with a cosmic point of view, as give…
▽ More
It is shown that Einstein field equations give two solutions for cosmology. The first one is the standard well known representative of the present status of cosmology. We identify it with the local point of view of a flat Universe with the values for the cosmological omega parameters (k = 0, lambda = 2/3, m = 1/3). The second one is a new one that we identify with a cosmic point of view, as given by free photons, neutrinos, tachyons and gravity quanta. We apply a wave to particle technique to find the matter propagation equation. Then we prove that all gravitational radii are constant, regardless of the possible time variations of the physical properties like the speed of light c, the gravitational constant G or the mass m of fundamental particles. We find two cosmological constants, c^3 /G and mc, with the condition that the field equations be derived from the action principle. With this result, and the integration of the Bianchi identity, we prove the existence of the two solutions for cosmology. We then validate Weinberg relation and prove that the speed of light c is proportional to the Hubble parameter H, a cosmological view. Thus, the cosmic observer (free photons and the like) are found to see accelerated photons with a numerical value that has been observed as an anomalous acceleration of the Pioneer 10/11 spacecrafts. An initial inflation is present which converts the Planck size into the present size of the Universe in about 140 initial tic-tac.
△ Less
Submitted 2 January, 2008;
originally announced January 2008.
-
The Speed of Light and the Hubble Parameter: The Mass-Boom Effect
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
We prove here that Newtons universal gravitation and momentum conservation laws together reproduce Weinbergs relation. It is shown that the Hubble parameter H must be built in this relation, or equivalently the age of the Universe t. Using a wave-to-particle interaction technique we then prove that the speed of light c decreases with cosmological time, and that c is proportional to the Hubble pa…
▽ More
We prove here that Newtons universal gravitation and momentum conservation laws together reproduce Weinbergs relation. It is shown that the Hubble parameter H must be built in this relation, or equivalently the age of the Universe t. Using a wave-to-particle interaction technique we then prove that the speed of light c decreases with cosmological time, and that c is proportional to the Hubble parameter H. We see the expansion of the Universe as a local effect due to the LAB value of the speed of light co taken as constant. We present a generalized red shift law and find a predicted acceleration for photons that agrees well with the result from Pioneer 10/11 anomalous acceleration. We finally present a cosmological model coherent with the above results that we call the Mass-Boom. It has a linear increase of mass m with time as a result of the speed of light c linear decrease with time, and the conservation of momentum mc. We obtain the baryonic mass parameter equal to the curvature parameter, omega m = omega k, so that the model is of the type of the Einstein static, closed, finite, spherical, unlimited, with zero cosmological constant. This model is the cosmological view as seen by photons, neutrinos, tachyons etc. in contrast with the local view, the LAB reference. Neither dark matter nor dark energy is required by this model. With an initial constant speed of light during a short time we get inflation (an exponential expansion). This converts, during the inflation time, the Plancks fluctuation length of 10-33 cm to the present size of the Universe (about 1028 cm, constant from then on). Thereafter the Mass-Boom takes care to bring the initial values of the Universe (about 1015 gr) to the value at the present time of about 1055 gr.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2008; v1 submitted 16 October, 2007;
originally announced October 2007.
-
Galaxies:kinematics as a proof of the existence of a universal field of minimum acceleration
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Taking into account only luminous objects, the kinematics of clusters of galaxies, galaxies and their interior, require a much higher mass than the luminous one to explain the observations. This situation has provoked more than 30 years of intense research and has stimulated hypothesis like the dark matter. Also new mechanical theories, different from Newton (like the Modified Newtonian Dynamics…
▽ More
Taking into account only luminous objects, the kinematics of clusters of galaxies, galaxies and their interior, require a much higher mass than the luminous one to explain the observations. This situation has provoked more than 30 years of intense research and has stimulated hypothesis like the dark matter. Also new mechanical theories, different from Newton (like the Modified Newtonian Dynamics), have been proposed. We here present an alternative: theoretical and observational data strongly suggest the existence of a universal field of minimum acceleration of the order of c/t, c the speed of light and t the age of the Universe. We keep our reasoning within the present state of the art of Quantum Mechanics, Relativity and Newtonian Mechanics. With this approach the kinematics of the luminous objects are explained without any additional assumption. At the same time the sizes of all structures in the Universe, from protons up to the Universe, are explained as due to the constant action of this field.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2008; v1 submitted 2 August, 2007;
originally announced August 2007.
-
Ultimate Fate of our Universe from Quantum Mechanics
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
It is conjectured that time intervals of any kind are proportional to the age of the Universe taken at the time we are considering the interval. If this is the case then the speed of light, in fact any speed, must decrease inversely proportional to this age. The immediate consequence is that energy is not conserved: the hypothesis that time is a homogeneous property implies conservation of energ…
▽ More
It is conjectured that time intervals of any kind are proportional to the age of the Universe taken at the time we are considering the interval. If this is the case then the speed of light, in fact any speed, must decrease inversely proportional to this age. The immediate consequence is that energy is not conserved: the hypothesis that time is a homogeneous property implies conservation of energy (the theorem of Noether). Nonconservation of energy follows from the condition that any time interval is proportional to the cosmological time, and therefore time can not be homogeneous. From the uncertainty principle, taking the constant of Planck as a real constant, time independent, it follows that any energy in the Universe decreases linearly with time. We then prove that Schroedinger equation does not change, except for the potential energy term. The future of the Universe gives for the wave functions a long sinusoidal spatial solution, so that everything becomes unlocalized. The relativistic absolute interval remains the same, even with a changing speed of light, and the Universe turns out to be nonexpanding. A Mass-Boom effect is confirmed.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2007;
originally announced May 2007.
-
Harmonizing General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
Gravitation is the common underlying texture between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. We take gravitation as the link that can make possible the marriage between these two sciences. We use here the duality of Nature for gravitation: A continuous warped space, wave-like, and a discrete quantum gas, particle-like, both coexistent and producing an equilibrium state in the Universe. The res…
▽ More
Gravitation is the common underlying texture between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. We take gravitation as the link that can make possible the marriage between these two sciences. We use here the duality of Nature for gravitation: A continuous warped space, wave-like, and a discrete quantum gas, particle-like, both coexistent and producing an equilibrium state in the Universe. The result is a static, non expanding, spherical, unlimited and finite Universe, with no cosmological constant and no dark energy. The Principle of Mach is reproduced here by the convergence of the two cosmological equations of Einstein. From this a Mass Boom concept is born given by M = t, M the mass of the Universe and t its age. Also a decreasing speed of light is the consequence of the Mass Boom, c = 1/t, which explains the Supernovae Type Ia observations without the need of expansion (nor, of course, accelerated expansion). Our Mass Boom model completely wipes out the problems and paradoxes built in the Big Bang model, like the horizon, monopole, entropy, flatness, fine tuning, etc. It also eliminates the need for inflation. Finally the relation proposed by Weinberg in 1972 is here explained in terms of a gravitational cross section for all gravitational masses.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2007; v1 submitted 9 January, 2007;
originally announced January 2007.
-
A Quantum Approach to Cosmology
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
We present a theory based upon the treatment of the gravitational field as a sea of gravity quanta, as defined elsewhere. The resultant model for the Universe is a static one, like Einstein first saw, with a new feature: a local shrinking quantum world that completely explains the Hubble red shift under a new point of view. The presently accepted expansion of the Universe is interpreted here as…
▽ More
We present a theory based upon the treatment of the gravitational field as a sea of gravity quanta, as defined elsewhere. The resultant model for the Universe is a static one, like Einstein first saw, with a new feature: a local shrinking quantum world that completely explains the Hubble red shift under a new point of view. The presently accepted expansion of the Universe is interpreted here as an apparent effect, as seen from the Lab system of reference. The static Universe has immersed in it a local shrinking atomic world: a fundamental change in the interpretation of the Hubble's observations. The conservation principles (momentum, angular momentum and energy) can be dealt with under 2 different points of view: local (apparent) and COSMOLOGICAL ("real"). The 2 are in complete agreement with observation. They are also free of well known contradictions or paradoxes/incoherencies (i.e. in the Big Bang model). By dealing now with very well known first principles (Heisenberg, Mach, de Broglie, Weinberg's relation) under the same 2 points of view, we arrive at the conclusion that our new approach is in accordance with the Einstein's field equations of General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics. We consider this to be a promising first step towards the way of dealing with the gravitational field coherently both from the General Relativity and from the Quantum Mechanical theories. The agreement with the present values of the cosmological parameters is very satisfactory.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2005;
originally announced January 2005.
-
Laboratory Physics and Cosmology
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
We find five fundamental reasons demanding that any gravitational mass m, and the speed of light c, vary with cosmological time such that mc remains constant. This is required by the universal condition of conservation of momentum in a Universe with spatial homogeneity. We prove that this is consistent with Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. We call this effect a "MASS BOOM". At the LAB sy…
▽ More
We find five fundamental reasons demanding that any gravitational mass m, and the speed of light c, vary with cosmological time such that mc remains constant. This is required by the universal condition of conservation of momentum in a Universe with spatial homogeneity. We prove that this is consistent with Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. We call this effect a "MASS BOOM". At the LAB system no such time variations can be detected, unless we make comparisons with cosmological observations. We have to stress that the physical conditions implied by a time varying mass, together with a time varying speed of light, preserving the constancy of momentum, are compatible with Einstein's field equations. We then integrate his cosmological equations and find the solution for the cosmological scale factor a(t) proportional to the square of time, implying an apparent accelerated expansion for the Universe, as seen from the LAB frame. This is the interpretation given to recent observations obtained from the Supernova Type Ia. This determination of the scale factor a(t) is based upon a LAB interpretation and therefore is an apparent effect. On the other hand we note that the product ct being a constant determines the real Universe as a static one, of constant size. The observed red shift at the LAB system is due to a real shrinkage of the quantum world, due to the decrease in size of the quantum particles determined by a decreasing Planck's "constant".
△ Less
Submitted 30 July, 2004;
originally announced July 2004.
-
Mass Boom Versus Big Bang: The Role of Planck's Constant
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
The Big Bang frame of work for cosmology is a theoretical construct based upon one possible interpretation of the Hubble observation of the red shift from distant galaxies. Almost all of the scientific experimental evidence has been interpreted under the Big-Bang hypothesis. And the results have been very promising though with a few important drawbacks. The main point in our present work is to p…
▽ More
The Big Bang frame of work for cosmology is a theoretical construct based upon one possible interpretation of the Hubble observation of the red shift from distant galaxies. Almost all of the scientific experimental evidence has been interpreted under the Big-Bang hypothesis. And the results have been very promising though with a few important drawbacks. The main point in our present work is to prove that the expansion of the Universe, the essence of the Big-Bang, is based upon an apparent interpretation of the distance-red shift relation found by Hubble. On the contrary, an absolute interpretation as we give here results in a constant size Universe, together with a shrinking quantum world. This is the role of Planck's constant: the red shift-distance relation can be interpreted as evidence of an expanding Universe or, alternatively, as evidence as evidence of a shrinking quantum world due to the decrease of Planck's constant with cosmological time.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2003;
originally announced September 2003.
-
Mass Boom Versus Big Bang: Einstein was Right
Authors:
Antonio Alfonso-Faus
Abstract:
When considering possible time variations of fundamental physical constants one has to keep firm well established principles. Following this approach we keep firm the Action Principle, General Relativity (the Equivalence Principle), and Mach's Principle. Also we introduce a new principle under the name of "TOTAL INTERACTION" and reconsider Weinberg's relation with a new approach. Consistent with…
▽ More
When considering possible time variations of fundamental physical constants one has to keep firm well established principles. Following this approach we keep firm the Action Principle, General Relativity (the Equivalence Principle), and Mach's Principle. Also we introduce a new principle under the name of "TOTAL INTERACTION" and reconsider Weinberg's relation with a new approach. Consistent with all these principles we find that all masses increase linearly with cosmological time (THE MASS BOOM) and that Planck's constant decreases also with this time.Then the whole quantum world shrinks with time too. This is the cause of the red shift
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2003;
originally announced February 2003.
