More room at the top: how small buoys aim at the detailed dynamics of the air-sea interface
Authors:
Luigi Cavaleri,
Victor Alari,
Alvise Benetazzo,
Jan-Victor Bjorkqvist,
Øyvind Breivik,
Jacob Davis,
Gaute Hope,
Atle Kleven,
Frode Leirvik,
Tor Nordam,
Jean Rabault,
E. J. Rainville,
Sander Rikka,
Torunn Irene Seldal,
Jim Thomson
Abstract:
Air-sea exchange processes have been identified as essential for both short- and long-term atmospheric and ocean forecasts. The two phases of the fluid layer covering our planet interact across a vast range of scales that we need to explore to achieve a better understanding of the exchange processes. While satellites provide a distributed large-scale view of the sea surface situation, highly detai…
▽ More
Air-sea exchange processes have been identified as essential for both short- and long-term atmospheric and ocean forecasts. The two phases of the fluid layer covering our planet interact across a vast range of scales that we need to explore to achieve a better understanding of the exchange processes. While satellites provide a distributed large-scale view of the sea surface situation, highly detailed measurements, e.g., from oceanographic towers, are necessarily local. The required intermediate solution (i.e., data that are both accurate and distributed) can be provided by swarms of miniature surface buoys. As size, weight, and cost are reduced, these can be deployed in large numbers to investigate specific processes that are at present only crudely parameterized in our models as a result of scarcity of good measurements. Perhaps the most crucial process is white-capping in stormy conditions, where air-sea exchanges are enhanced by one or two orders of magnitude. Other applications include wave-current interactions, wave-ice interactions, and plunging breakers in the coastal zone.
Following a dedicated workshop, we summarize here the main findings and possibilities derived from the different approaches, and summarize the state of the art for a selection of miniature buoys. We list the solutions presented at the workshop, as well as other similar buoys, with their main characteristics and range of application. We describe the various possibilities of practical use and the scientific and engineering problems to be solved. Looking to the future, we also point out where the present technological improvements are leading to.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
Comparing a 41-year model hindcast with decades of wave measurements from the Baltic Sea
Authors:
Jan-Victor Björkqvist,
Ingvar Lukas,
Victor Alari,
Gerbrant Ph. van Vledder,
Sander Hulst,
Heidi Pettersson,
Arno Behrens,
Aarne Männik
Abstract:
We present ice-free and ice-included statistics for the Baltic Sea using a wave hindcast validated against data from 13 wave measurement sites. In the hindcast 84% of wave events with a significant wave height over 7 m occurred between November and January. The effect of the ice cover is largest in the Bay of Bothnia, where the mean significant wave height is reduced by 30% when the ice time is in…
▽ More
We present ice-free and ice-included statistics for the Baltic Sea using a wave hindcast validated against data from 13 wave measurement sites. In the hindcast 84% of wave events with a significant wave height over 7 m occurred between November and January. The effect of the ice cover is largest in the Bay of Bothnia, where the mean significant wave height is reduced by 30% when the ice time is included in the statistics. The difference between these two statistics are less than 0.05 m below a latitude of 59.5 degrees. The seasonal ice cover also causes measurement gaps by forcing an early recovery of the instruments. Including the time not captured by the wave buoy can affect the estimates for the significant wave height by roughly 20%. The impact below the 99th percentiles are still under 5%. The significant wave height is modelled accurately even close to the shore, but the highest peak periods are underestimated in a narrow bay. Sensitivity test show that this underestimation is most likely caused by an excessive refraction towards the shore. Reconsidering the role of the spatial resolution and the physical processes affecting the low-frequency waves is suggested as a possible solution.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2018; v1 submitted 1 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
