-
The LHCb upgrade I
Authors:
LHCb collaboration,
R. Aaij,
A. S. W. Abdelmotteleb,
C. Abellan Beteta,
F. Abudinén,
C. Achard,
T. Ackernley,
B. Adeva,
M. Adinolfi,
P. Adlarson,
H. Afsharnia,
C. Agapopoulou,
C. A. Aidala,
Z. Ajaltouni,
S. Akar,
K. Akiba,
P. Albicocco,
J. Albrecht,
F. Alessio,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
Z. Aliouche,
P. Alvarez Cartelle,
R. Amalric,
S. Amato
, et al. (1298 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their select…
▽ More
The LHCb upgrade represents a major change of the experiment. The detectors have been almost completely renewed to allow running at an instantaneous luminosity five times larger than that of the previous running periods. Readout of all detectors into an all-software trigger is central to the new design, facilitating the reconstruction of events at the maximum LHC interaction rate, and their selection in real time. The experiment's tracking system has been completely upgraded with a new pixel vertex detector, a silicon tracker upstream of the dipole magnet and three scintillating fibre tracking stations downstream of the magnet. The whole photon detection system of the RICH detectors has been renewed and the readout electronics of the calorimeter and muon systems have been fully overhauled. The first stage of the all-software trigger is implemented on a GPU farm. The output of the trigger provides a combination of totally reconstructed physics objects, such as tracks and vertices, ready for final analysis, and of entire events which need further offline reprocessing. This scheme required a complete revision of the computing model and rewriting of the experiment's software.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2024; v1 submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
A Comparison of CPU and GPU implementations for the LHCb Experiment Run 3 Trigger
Authors:
R. Aaij,
M. Adinolfi,
S. Aiola,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
S. Amato,
Y. Amhis,
F. Archilli,
M. Bala,
G. Bassi,
L. Bian,
M. P. Blago,
T. Boettcher,
A. Boldyrev,
S. Borghi,
A. Brea Rodriguez,
L. Calefice,
M. Calvo Gomez,
D. H. Cámpora Pérez,
A. Cardini,
M. Cattaneo,
V. Chobanova,
G. Ciezarek,
X. Cid Vidal
, et al. (135 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are fo…
▽ More
The LHCb experiment at CERN is undergoing an upgrade in preparation for the Run 3 data taking period of the LHC. As part of this upgrade the trigger is moving to a fully software implementation operating at the LHC bunch crossing rate. We present an evaluation of a CPU-based and a GPU-based implementation of the first stage of the High Level Trigger. After a detailed comparison both options are found to be viable. This document summarizes the performance and implementation details of these options, the outcome of which has led to the choice of the GPU-based implementation as the baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2022; v1 submitted 9 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Progress in developing a hybrid deep learning algorithm for identifying and locating primary vertices
Authors:
Simon Akar,
Gowtham Atluri,
Thomas Boettcher,
Michael Peters,
Henry Schreiner,
Michael Sokoloff,
Marian Stahl,
William Tepe,
Constantin Weisser,
Mike Williams
Abstract:
The locations of proton-proton collision points in LHC experiments are called primary vertices (PVs). Preliminary results of a hybrid deep learning algorithm for identifying and locating these, targeting the Run 3 incarnation of LHCb, have been described at conferences in 2019 and 2020. In the past year we have made significant progress in a variety of related areas. Using two newer Kernel Density…
▽ More
The locations of proton-proton collision points in LHC experiments are called primary vertices (PVs). Preliminary results of a hybrid deep learning algorithm for identifying and locating these, targeting the Run 3 incarnation of LHCb, have been described at conferences in 2019 and 2020. In the past year we have made significant progress in a variety of related areas. Using two newer Kernel Density Estimators (KDEs) as input feature sets improves the fidelity of the models, as does using full LHCb simulation rather than the "toy Monte Carlo" originally (and still) used to develop models. We have also built a deep learning model to calculate the KDEs from track information. Connecting a tracks-to-KDE model to a KDE-to-hists model used to find PVs provides a proof-of-concept that a single deep learning model can use track information to find PVs with high efficiency and high fidelity. We have studied a variety of models systematically to understand how variations in their architectures affect performance. While the studies reported here are specific to the LHCb geometry and operating conditions, the results suggest that the same approach could be used by the ATLAS and CMS experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2021; v1 submitted 8 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
An updated hybrid deep learning algorithm for identifying and locating primary vertices
Authors:
Simon Akar,
Thomas J. Boettcher,
Sarah Carl,
Henry F. Schreiner,
Michael D. Sokoloff,
Marian Stahl,
Constantin Weisser,
Mike Williams
Abstract:
We present an improved hybrid algorithm for vertexing, that combines deep learning with conventional methods. Even though the algorithm is a generic approach to vertex finding, we focus here on it's application as an alternative Primary Vertex (PV) finding tool for the LHCb experiment.
In the transition to Run 3 in 2021, LHCb will undergo a major luminosity upgrade, going from 1.1 to 5.6 expecte…
▽ More
We present an improved hybrid algorithm for vertexing, that combines deep learning with conventional methods. Even though the algorithm is a generic approach to vertex finding, we focus here on it's application as an alternative Primary Vertex (PV) finding tool for the LHCb experiment.
In the transition to Run 3 in 2021, LHCb will undergo a major luminosity upgrade, going from 1.1 to 5.6 expected visible PVs per event, and it will adopt a purely software trigger. We use a custom kernel to transform the sparse 3D space of hits and tracks into a dense 1D dataset, and then apply Deep Learning techniques to find PV locations using proxy distributions to encode the truth in training data. Last year we reported that training networks on our kernels using several Convolutional Neural Network layers yielded better than 90 % efficiency with no more than 0.2 False Positives (FPs) per event. Modifying several elements of the algorithm, we now achieve better than 94 % efficiency with a significantly lower FP rate. Where our studies to date have been made using toy Monte Carlo (MC), we began to study KDEs produced from complete LHCb Run 3 MC data, including full tracking in the vertex locator rather than proto-tracking.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Design and performance of the LHCb trigger and full real-time reconstruction in Run 2 of the LHC
Authors:
R. Aaij,
S. Akar,
J. Albrecht,
M. Alexander,
A. Alfonso Albero,
S. Amerio,
L. Anderlini,
P. d'Argent,
A. Baranov,
W. Barter,
S. Benson,
D. Bobulska,
T. Boettcher,
S. Borghi,
E. E. Bowen,
L. Brarda,
C. Burr,
J. -P. Cachemiche,
M. Calvo Gomez,
M. Cattaneo,
H. Chanal,
M. Chapman,
M. Chebbi,
M. Chefdeville,
P. Ciambrone
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run…
▽ More
The LHCb collaboration has redesigned its trigger to enable the full offline detector reconstruction to be performed in real time. Together with the real-time alignment and calibration of the detector, and a software infrastructure to make persistent the high-level physics objects produced during real-time processing, this redesign enabled the widespread deployment of real-time analysis during Run 2. We describe the design of the Run 2 trigger and real-time reconstruction, and present data-driven performance measurements for a representative sample of LHCb's physics programme.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2019; v1 submitted 27 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
