The CeBrA demonstrator for particle-$γ$ coincidence experiments at the FSU Super-Enge Split-Pole Spectrograph
Authors:
A. L. Conley,
B. Kelly,
M. Spieker,
R. Aggarwal,
S. Ajayi,
L. T. Baby,
S. Baker,
C. Benetti,
I. Conroy,
P. D. Cottle,
I. B. D`Amato,
P. DeRosa,
J. Esparza,
S. Genty,
K. Hanselman,
I. Hay,
M. Heinze,
D. Houlihan,
M. I. Khawaja,
P. S. Kielb,
A. N. Kuchera,
G. W. McCann,
A. B. Morelock,
E. Lopez-Saavedra,
R. Renom
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report on a highly selective experimental setup for particle-$γ$ coincidence experiments at the Super-Enge Split-Pole Spectrograph (SE-SPS) of the John D. Fox Superconducting Linear Accelerator Laboratory at Florida State University (FSU) using fast CeBr$_3$ scintillators for $γ$-ray detection. Specifically, we report on the results of characterization tests for the first five CeBr$_3$ scintill…
▽ More
We report on a highly selective experimental setup for particle-$γ$ coincidence experiments at the Super-Enge Split-Pole Spectrograph (SE-SPS) of the John D. Fox Superconducting Linear Accelerator Laboratory at Florida State University (FSU) using fast CeBr$_3$ scintillators for $γ$-ray detection. Specifically, we report on the results of characterization tests for the first five CeBr$_3$ scintillation detectors of the CeBr$_3$ Array (CeBrA) with respect to energy resolution and timing characteristics. We also present results from the first particle-$γ$ coincidence experiments successfully performed with the CeBrA demonstrator and the FSU SE-SPS. We show that with the new setup, $γ$-decay branching ratios and particle-$γ$ angular correlations can be measured very selectively using narrow excitation energy gates, which are possible thanks to the excellent particle energy resolution of the SE-SPS. In addition, we highlight that nuclear level lifetimes in the nanoseconds regime can be determined by measuring the time difference between particle detection with the SE-SPS focal-plane scintillator and $γ$-ray detection with the fast CeBrA detectors. Selective excitation energy gates with the SE-SPS exclude any feeding contributions to these lifetimes.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
Increase of SERS Signal Upon Heating or Exposure to a High-Intensity Laser Field: Benzenethiol on an AgFON Substrate
Authors:
Roshan L. Aggarwal,
Lewis W. Farrar,
Semion K. Saikin
Abstract:
The surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) signal from an AgFON plasmonic substrate, recoated with benzenethiol, was observed to increase by about 100% upon heating for 3.5 min at 100C and 1.5 min at 125C. The signal intensity was found to increase further by about 80% upon a 10 sec exposure to a high-intensity (3.2 kW/cm^2) 785-nm cw laser, corresponding to 40 mW in a 40+/-5-um diameter spot. T…
▽ More
The surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) signal from an AgFON plasmonic substrate, recoated with benzenethiol, was observed to increase by about 100% upon heating for 3.5 min at 100C and 1.5 min at 125C. The signal intensity was found to increase further by about 80% upon a 10 sec exposure to a high-intensity (3.2 kW/cm^2) 785-nm cw laser, corresponding to 40 mW in a 40+/-5-um diameter spot. The observed increase in the SERS signal may be understood by considering the presence of benzenethiol molecules in an intermediate or 'precursor' state in addition to conventionally ordered molecules forming a self-assembled monolayer. The increase in the SERS signal arises from the conversion of the molecules in the precursor state to the chemisorbed state due to thermal and photo-thermal effects.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
Error Bars for Distributions of Numbers of Events
Authors:
Ritu Aggarwal,
Allen Caldwell
Abstract:
The common practice for displaying error bars on distributions of numbers of events is confusing and can lead to incorrect conclusions. A proposal is made for a different style of presentation that more directly indicates the level of agreement between expectations and observations.
The common practice for displaying error bars on distributions of numbers of events is confusing and can lead to incorrect conclusions. A proposal is made for a different style of presentation that more directly indicates the level of agreement between expectations and observations.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2012; v1 submitted 12 December, 2011;
originally announced December 2011.
