Measurement of the neutron lifetime using an asymmetric magneto- gravitational trap and in situ detection
Authors:
R. W. Pattie Jr.,
N. B. Callahan,
C. Cude-Woods,
E. R. Adamek,
L. J. Broussard,
S. M. Clayton,
S. A. Currie,
E. B. Dees,
X. Ding,
E. M. Engel,
D. E. Fellers,
W. Fox,
K. P. Hickerson,
M. A. Hoffbauer,
A. T. Holley,
A. Komives,
C. -Y. Liu,
S. W. T. MacDonald,
M. Makela,
C. L. Morris,
J. D. Ortiz,
J. Ramsey,
D. J. Salvat,
A. Saunders,
S. J. Seestrom
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The precise value of the mean neutron lifetime, $τ_n$, plays an important role in nuclear and particle physics and cosmology. It is a key input for predicting the ratio of protons to helium atoms in the primordial universe and is used to search for new physics beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. There is a 3.9 standard deviation discrepancy between $τ_n$ measured by counting the decay r…
▽ More
The precise value of the mean neutron lifetime, $τ_n$, plays an important role in nuclear and particle physics and cosmology. It is a key input for predicting the ratio of protons to helium atoms in the primordial universe and is used to search for new physics beyond the Standard Model of particle physics. There is a 3.9 standard deviation discrepancy between $τ_n$ measured by counting the decay rate of free neutrons in a beam (887.7 $\pm$ 2.2 s) and by counting surviving ultracold neutrons stored for different storage times in a material trap (878.5$\pm$0.8 s). The experiment described here eliminates loss mechanisms present in previous trap experiments by levitating polarized ultracold neutrons above the surface of an asymmetric storage trap using a repulsive magnetic field gradient so that the stored neutrons do not interact with material trap walls and neutrons in quasi-stable orbits rapidly exit the trap. As a result of this approach and the use of a new in situ neutron detector, the lifetime reported here (877.7 $\pm$ 0.7 (stat) +0.4/-0.2 (sys) s) is the first modern measurement of $τ_n$ that does not require corrections larger than the quoted uncertainties.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2018; v1 submitted 6 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
Weak charge form factor and radius of 208Pb through parity violation in electron scattering
Authors:
C. J. Horowitz,
Z. Ahmed,
C. -M. Jen,
A. Rakhman,
P. A. Souder,
M. M. Dalton,
N. Liyanage,
K. D. Paschke,
K. Saenboonruang,
R. Silwal,
G. B. Franklin,
M. Friend,
B. Quinn,
K. S. Kumar,
J. M. Mammei,
D. McNulty,
L. Mercado,
S. Riordan,
J. Wexler,
R. W. Michaels,
G. M. Urciuoli
Abstract:
We use distorted wave electron scattering calculations to extract the weak charge form factor F_W(q), the weak charge radius R_W, and the point neutron radius R_n, of 208Pb from the PREX parity violating asymmetry measurement. The form factor is the Fourier transform of the weak charge density at the average momentum transfer q=0.475 fm$^{-1}$. We find F_W(q) =0.204 \pm 0.028 (exp) \pm 0.001 (mode…
▽ More
We use distorted wave electron scattering calculations to extract the weak charge form factor F_W(q), the weak charge radius R_W, and the point neutron radius R_n, of 208Pb from the PREX parity violating asymmetry measurement. The form factor is the Fourier transform of the weak charge density at the average momentum transfer q=0.475 fm$^{-1}$. We find F_W(q) =0.204 \pm 0.028 (exp) \pm 0.001 (model). We use the Helm model to infer the weak radius from F_W(q). We find R_W= 5.826 \pm 0.181 (exp) \pm 0.027 (model) fm. Here the exp error includes PREX statistical and systematic errors, while the model error describes the uncertainty in R_W from uncertainties in the surface thickness σof the weak charge density. The weak radius is larger than the charge radius, implying a "weak charge skin" where the surface region is relatively enriched in weak charges compared to (electromagnetic) charges. We extract the point neutron radius R_n=5.751 \pm 0.175 (exp) \pm 0.026 (model) \pm 0.005 (strange) fm$, from R_W. Here there is only a very small error (strange) from possible strange quark contributions. We find R_n to be slightly smaller than R_W because of the nucleon's size. Finally, we find a neutron skin thickness of R_n-R_p=0.302\pm 0.175 (exp) \pm 0.026 (model) \pm 0.005 (strange) fm, where R_p is the point proton radius.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2014; v1 submitted 7 February, 2012;
originally announced February 2012.
