-
White Paper on Software Infrastructure for Advanced Nuclear Physics Computing
Authors:
P. M. Jacobs,
A. Boehnlein,
B. Sawatzky,
J. Carlson,
I. Cloet,
M. Diefenthaler,
R. G. Edwards,
K. Godbey,
W. R. Hix,
K. Orginos,
T. Papenbrock,
M. Ploskon,
C. Ratti,
R. Soltz,
T. Wenaus,
L. Andreoli,
J. Brodsky,
D. Brown,
A. Bulgac,
G. D. Chung,
S. J. Coleman,
J. Detwiler,
A. Dubey,
R. Ehlers,
S. Gandolfi
, et al. (27 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This White Paper documents the discussion and consensus conclusions of the workshop "Software Infrastructure for Advanced Nuclear Physics Computing" (SANPC 24), which was held at Jefferson Lab on June 20-22, 2024. The workshop brought together members of the US Nuclear Physics community with data scientists and funding agency representatives, to discuss the challenges and opportunities in advanced…
▽ More
This White Paper documents the discussion and consensus conclusions of the workshop "Software Infrastructure for Advanced Nuclear Physics Computing" (SANPC 24), which was held at Jefferson Lab on June 20-22, 2024. The workshop brought together members of the US Nuclear Physics community with data scientists and funding agency representatives, to discuss the challenges and opportunities in advanced computing for Nuclear Physics in the coming decade. Opportunities for sustainable support and growth are identified, within the context of existing and currently planned DOE and NSF programs.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2025; v1 submitted 1 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
-
Electron capture rates on nuclei and implications for stellar core collapse
Authors:
K. Langanke,
G. Martinez-Pinedo,
J. M. Sampaio,
D. J. Dean,
W. R. Hix,
O. E. B. Messer,
A. Mezzacappa,
M. Liebendoerfer,
H. -Th. Janka,
M. Rampp
Abstract:
Supernova simulations to date have assumed that during core collapse electron captures occur dominantly on free protons, while captures on heavy nuclei are Pauli-blocked and are ignored. We have calculated rates for electron capture on nuclei with mass numbers A=65-112 for the temperatures and densities appropriate for core collapse. We find that these rates are large enough so that, in contrast…
▽ More
Supernova simulations to date have assumed that during core collapse electron captures occur dominantly on free protons, while captures on heavy nuclei are Pauli-blocked and are ignored. We have calculated rates for electron capture on nuclei with mass numbers A=65-112 for the temperatures and densities appropriate for core collapse. We find that these rates are large enough so that, in contrast to previous assumptions, electron capture on nuclei dominates over capture on free protons. This leads to significant changes in core collapse simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2003;
originally announced February 2003.
-
Simulation of the Spherically Symmetric Stellar Core Collapse, Bounce, and Postbounce Evolution of a 13 Solar Mass Star with Boltzmann Neutrino Transport, and Its Implications for the Supernova Mechanism
Authors:
Anthony Mezzacappa,
Matthias Liebendoerfer,
O. E. Bronson Messer,
W. Raphael Hix,
Friederich-Karl Thielemann,
Stephen W. Bruenn
Abstract:
With exact three-flavor Boltzmann neutrino transport, we simulate the stellar core collapse, bounce, and postbounce evolution of a 13 solar mass star in spherical symmetry, the Newtonian limit, without invoking convection. In the absence of convection, prior spherically symmetric models, which implemented approximations to Boltzmann transport, failed to produce explosions. We are motivated to co…
▽ More
With exact three-flavor Boltzmann neutrino transport, we simulate the stellar core collapse, bounce, and postbounce evolution of a 13 solar mass star in spherical symmetry, the Newtonian limit, without invoking convection. In the absence of convection, prior spherically symmetric models, which implemented approximations to Boltzmann transport, failed to produce explosions. We are motivated to consider exact transport to determine if these failures were due to the transport approximations made and to answer remaining fundamental questions in supernova theory. The model presented here is the first in a sequence of models beginning with different progenitors. In this model, a supernova explosion is not obtained. We discuss the ramifications of our results for the supernova mechanism.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2000; v1 submitted 17 May, 2000;
originally announced May 2000.