-
Supernova electron-neutrino interactions with xenon in the nEXO detector
Authors:
nEXO Collaboration,
S. Hedges,
S. Al Kharusi,
E. Angelico,
J. P. Brodsky,
G. Richardson,
S. Wilde,
A. Amy,
A. Anker,
I. J. Arnquist,
P. Arsenault,
A. Atencio,
I. Badhrees,
J. Bane,
V. Belov,
E. P. Bernard,
T. Bhatta,
A. Bolotnikov,
J. Breslin,
P. A. Breur,
E. Brown,
T. Brunner,
E. Caden,
G. F. Cao,
L. Q. Cao
, et al. (122 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Electron-neutrino charged-current interactions with xenon nuclei were modeled in the nEXO neutrinoless double-$β$ decay detector (~5 metric ton, 90% ${}^{136}$Xe, 10% ${}^{134}$Xe) to evaluate its sensitivity to supernova neutrinos. Predictions for event rates and detectable signatures were modeled using the Model of Argon Reaction Low Energy Yields (MARLEY) event generator. We find good agreement…
▽ More
Electron-neutrino charged-current interactions with xenon nuclei were modeled in the nEXO neutrinoless double-$β$ decay detector (~5 metric ton, 90% ${}^{136}$Xe, 10% ${}^{134}$Xe) to evaluate its sensitivity to supernova neutrinos. Predictions for event rates and detectable signatures were modeled using the Model of Argon Reaction Low Energy Yields (MARLEY) event generator. We find good agreement between MARLEY's predictions and existing theoretical calculations of the inclusive cross sections at supernova neutrino energies. The interactions modeled by MARLEY were simulated within the nEXO simulation framework and were run through an example reconstruction algorithm to determine the detector's efficiency for reconstructing these events. The simulated data, incorporating the detector response, were used to study the ability of nEXO to reconstruct the incident electron-neutrino spectrum and these results were extended to a larger xenon detector of the same isotope enrichment. We estimate that nEXO will be able to observe electron-neutrino interactions with xenon from supernovae as far as 5-8 kpc from Earth, while the ability to reconstruct incident electron-neutrino spectrum parameters from observed interactions in nEXO is limited to closer supernovae.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2024; v1 submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Fundamental Symmetries, Neutrons, and Neutrinos (FSNN): Whitepaper for the 2023 NSAC Long Range Plan
Authors:
B. Acharya,
C. Adams,
A. A. Aleksandrova,
K. Alfonso,
P. An,
S. Baeßler,
A. B. Balantekin,
P. S. Barbeau,
F. Bellini,
V. Bellini,
R. S. Beminiwattha,
J. C. Bernauer,
T. Bhattacharya,
M. Bishof,
A. E. Bolotnikov,
P. A. Breur,
M. Brodeur,
J. P. Brodsky,
L. J. Broussard,
T. Brunner,
D. P. Burdette,
J. Caylor,
M. Chiu,
V. Cirigliano,
J. A. Clark
, et al. (154 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This whitepaper presents the research priorities decided on by attendees of the 2022 Town Meeting for Fundamental Symmetries, Neutrons and Neutrinos, which took place December 13-15, 2022 in Chapel Hill, NC, as part of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) 2023 Long Range Planning process. A total of 275 scientists registered for the meeting. The whitepaper makes a number of explicit recom…
▽ More
This whitepaper presents the research priorities decided on by attendees of the 2022 Town Meeting for Fundamental Symmetries, Neutrons and Neutrinos, which took place December 13-15, 2022 in Chapel Hill, NC, as part of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) 2023 Long Range Planning process. A total of 275 scientists registered for the meeting. The whitepaper makes a number of explicit recommendations and justifies them in detail.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The Present and Future of QCD
Authors:
P. Achenbach,
D. Adhikari,
A. Afanasev,
F. Afzal,
C. A. Aidala,
A. Al-bataineh,
D. K. Almaalol,
M. Amaryan,
D. Androić,
W. R. Armstrong,
M. Arratia,
J. Arrington,
A. Asaturyan,
E. C. Aschenauer,
H. Atac,
H. Avakian,
T. Averett,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
X. Bai,
K. N. Barish,
N. Barnea,
G. Basar,
M. Battaglieri,
A. A. Baty,
I. Bautista
, et al. (378 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This White Paper presents the community inputs and scientific conclusions from the Hot and Cold QCD Town Meeting that took place September 23-25, 2022 at MIT, as part of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) 2023 Long Range Planning process. A total of 424 physicists registered for the meeting. The meeting highlighted progress in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) nuclear physics since the 2015…
▽ More
This White Paper presents the community inputs and scientific conclusions from the Hot and Cold QCD Town Meeting that took place September 23-25, 2022 at MIT, as part of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) 2023 Long Range Planning process. A total of 424 physicists registered for the meeting. The meeting highlighted progress in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) nuclear physics since the 2015 LRP (LRP15) and identified key questions and plausible paths to obtaining answers to those questions, defining priorities for our research over the coming decade. In defining the priority of outstanding physics opportunities for the future, both prospects for the short (~ 5 years) and longer term (5-10 years and beyond) are identified together with the facilities, personnel and other resources needed to maximize the discovery potential and maintain United States leadership in QCD physics worldwide. This White Paper is organized as follows: In the Executive Summary, we detail the Recommendations and Initiatives that were presented and discussed at the Town Meeting, and their supporting rationales. Section 2 highlights major progress and accomplishments of the past seven years. It is followed, in Section 3, by an overview of the physics opportunities for the immediate future, and in relation with the next QCD frontier: the EIC. Section 4 provides an overview of the physics motivations and goals associated with the EIC. Section 5 is devoted to the workforce development and support of diversity, equity and inclusion. This is followed by a dedicated section on computing in Section 6. Section 7 describes the national need for nuclear data science and the relevance to QCD research.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
Authors:
C. Adams,
K. Alfonso,
C. Andreoiu,
E. Angelico,
I. J. Arnquist,
J. A. A. Asaadi,
F. T. Avignone,
S. N. Axani,
A. S. Barabash,
P. S. Barbeau,
L. Baudis,
F. Bellini,
M. Beretta,
T. Bhatta,
V. Biancacci,
M. Biassoni,
E. Bossio,
P. A. Breur,
J. P. Brodsky,
C. Brofferio,
E. Brown,
R. Brugnera,
T. Brunner,
N. Burlac,
E. Caden
, et al. (207 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This White Paper, prepared for the Fundamental Symmetries, Neutrons, and Neutrinos Town Meeting related to the 2023 Nuclear Physics Long Range Plan, makes the case for double beta decay as a critical component of the future nuclear physics program. The major experimental collaborations and many theorists have endorsed this white paper.
This White Paper, prepared for the Fundamental Symmetries, Neutrons, and Neutrinos Town Meeting related to the 2023 Nuclear Physics Long Range Plan, makes the case for double beta decay as a critical component of the future nuclear physics program. The major experimental collaborations and many theorists have endorsed this white paper.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Precision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of $^{48}$Ca
Authors:
D. Adhikari,
H. Albataineh,
D. Androic,
K. A. Aniol,
D. S. Armstrong,
T. Averett,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
S. K. Barcus,
V. Bellini,
R. S. Beminiwattha,
J. F. Benesch,
H. Bhatt,
D. Bhatta Pathak,
D. Bhetuwal,
B. Blaikie,
J. Boyd,
Q. Campagna,
A. Camsonne,
G. D. Cates,
Y. Chen,
C. Clarke,
J. C. Cornejo,
S. Covrig Dusa,
M. M. Dalton,
P. Datta
, et al. (77 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report a precise measurement of the parity-violating asymmetry $A_{\rm PV}$ in the elastic scattering of longitudinally polarized electrons from $^{48}{\rm Ca}$. We measure $A_{\rm PV} =2668\pm 106\ {\rm (stat)}\pm 40\ {\rm (syst)}$ parts per billion, leading to an extraction of the neutral weak form factor $F_{\rm W} (q=0.8733$ fm…
▽ More
We report a precise measurement of the parity-violating asymmetry $A_{\rm PV}$ in the elastic scattering of longitudinally polarized electrons from $^{48}{\rm Ca}$. We measure $A_{\rm PV} =2668\pm 106\ {\rm (stat)}\pm 40\ {\rm (syst)}$ parts per billion, leading to an extraction of the neutral weak form factor $F_{\rm W} (q=0.8733$ fm$^{-1}) = 0.1304 \pm 0.0052 \ {\rm (stat)}\pm 0.0020\ {\rm (syst)}$ and the charge minus the weak form factor $F_{\rm ch} - F_{\rm W} = 0.0277\pm 0.0055$. The resulting neutron skin thickness $R_n-R_p=0.121 \pm 0.026\ {\rm (exp)} \pm 0.024\ {\rm (model)}$~fm is relatively thin yet consistent with many model calculations. The combined CREX and PREX results will have implications for future energy density functional calculations and on the density dependence of the symmetry energy of nuclear matter.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2022; v1 submitted 23 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Electron Ion Collider for High Energy Physics
Authors:
R. Abdul Khalek,
U. D'Alesio,
M. Arratia,
A. Bacchetta,
M. Battaglieri,
M. Begel,
M. Boglione,
R. Boughezal,
R. Boussarie,
G. Bozzi,
S. V. Chekanov,
F. G. Celiberto,
G. Chirilli,
T. Cridge,
R. Cruz-Torres,
R. Corliss,
C. Cotton,
H. Davoudiasl,
A. Deshpande,
X. Dong,
A. Emmert,
S. Fazio,
S. Forte,
Y. Furletova,
C. Gal
, et al. (83 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Electron Ion Collider (EIC) is a particle accelerator facility planned for construction at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, New York by the United States Department of Energy. EIC will provide capabilities of colliding beams of polarized electrons with polarized beams of proton and light ions. EIC will be one of the largest and most sophisticated new accelerator facilities worldwide,…
▽ More
Electron Ion Collider (EIC) is a particle accelerator facility planned for construction at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, New York by the United States Department of Energy. EIC will provide capabilities of colliding beams of polarized electrons with polarized beams of proton and light ions. EIC will be one of the largest and most sophisticated new accelerator facilities worldwide, and the only new large-scale accelerator facility planned for construction in the United States in the next few decades. The versatility, resolving power and intensity of EIC will present many new opportunities to address some of the crucial and fundamental open scientific questions in particle physics. This document provides an overview of the science case of EIC from the perspective of the high energy physics community.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2022; v1 submitted 24 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report
Authors:
R. Abdul Khalek,
A. Accardi,
J. Adam,
D. Adamiak,
W. Akers,
M. Albaladejo,
A. Al-bataineh,
M. G. Alexeev,
F. Ameli,
P. Antonioli,
N. Armesto,
W. R. Armstrong,
M. Arratia,
J. Arrington,
A. Asaturyan,
M. Asai,
E. C. Aschenauer,
S. Aune,
H. Avagyan,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
B. Azmoun,
A. Bacchetta,
M. D. Baker,
F. Barbosa,
L. Barion
, et al. (390 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This report describes the physics case, the resulting detector requirements, and the evolving detector concepts for the experimental program at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). The EIC will be a powerful new high-luminosity facility in the United States with the capability to collide high-energy electron beams with high-energy proton and ion beams, providing access to those regions in the nucleon…
▽ More
This report describes the physics case, the resulting detector requirements, and the evolving detector concepts for the experimental program at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). The EIC will be a powerful new high-luminosity facility in the United States with the capability to collide high-energy electron beams with high-energy proton and ion beams, providing access to those regions in the nucleon and nuclei where their structure is dominated by gluons. Moreover, polarized beams in the EIC will give unprecedented access to the spatial and spin structure of the proton, neutron, and light ions. The studies leading to this document were commissioned and organized by the EIC User Group with the objective of advancing the state and detail of the physics program and developing detector concepts that meet the emerging requirements in preparation for the realization of the EIC. The effort aims to provide the basis for further development of concepts for experimental equipment best suited for the science needs, including the importance of two complementary detectors and interaction regions.
This report consists of three volumes. Volume I is an executive summary of our findings and developed concepts. In Volume II we describe studies of a wide range of physics measurements and the emerging requirements on detector acceptance and performance. Volume III discusses general-purpose detector concepts and the underlying technologies to meet the physics requirements. These considerations will form the basis for a world-class experimental program that aims to increase our understanding of the fundamental structure of all visible matter
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2021; v1 submitted 8 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Measurement of the Spectral Shape of the beta-decay of 137Xe to the Ground State of 137Cs in EXO-200 and Comparison with Theory
Authors:
S. Al Kharusi,
G. Anton,
I. Badhrees,
P. S. Barbeau,
D. Beck,
V. Belov,
T. Bhatta,
M. Breidenbach,
T. Brunner,
G. F. Cao,
W. R. Cen,
C. Chambers,
B. Cleveland,
M. Coon,
A. Craycraft,
T. Daniels,
L. Darroch,
S. J. Daugherty,
J. Davis,
S. Delaquis,
A. Der Mesrobian-Kabakian,
R. DeVoe,
J. Dilling,
A. Dolgolenko,
M. J. Dolinski
, et al. (83 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report on a comparison between the theoretically predicted and experimentally measured spectra of the first-forbidden non-unique $β$-decay transition $^{137}\textrm{Xe}(7/2^-)\to\,^{137}\textrm{Cs}(7/2^+)$. The experimental data were acquired by the EXO-200 experiment during a deployment of an AmBe neutron source. The ultra-low background environment of EXO-200, together with dedicated source d…
▽ More
We report on a comparison between the theoretically predicted and experimentally measured spectra of the first-forbidden non-unique $β$-decay transition $^{137}\textrm{Xe}(7/2^-)\to\,^{137}\textrm{Cs}(7/2^+)$. The experimental data were acquired by the EXO-200 experiment during a deployment of an AmBe neutron source. The ultra-low background environment of EXO-200, together with dedicated source deployment and analysis procedures, allowed for collection of a pure sample of the decays, with an estimated signal-to-background ratio of more than 99-to-1 in the energy range from 1075 to 4175 keV. In addition to providing a rare and accurate measurement of the first-forbidden non-unique $β$-decay shape, this work constitutes a novel test of the calculated electron spectral shapes in the context of the reactor antineutrino anomaly and spectral bump.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2020; v1 submitted 31 January, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Superdeformation and alpha - cluster structure in 35Cl
Authors:
Abhijit Bisoi,
M. Saha Sarkar,
S. Sarkar,
S. Ray,
M. Roy Basu,
Debasmita Kanjilal,
Somnath Nag,
K. Selva Kumar,
A. Goswami,
N. Madhavan,
S. Muralithar,
R. K. Bhowmik
Abstract:
A superdeformed (SD) band has been identified in a non - alpha - conjugate nucleus 35Cl. It crosses the negative parity ground band above 11/2- and becomes the yrast at 15/2-. Lifetimes of all relevant states have been measured to follow the evolution of collectivity. Enhanced B(E2), B(E1) values as well as energetics provide evidences for superdeformation and existence of parity doublet cluster s…
▽ More
A superdeformed (SD) band has been identified in a non - alpha - conjugate nucleus 35Cl. It crosses the negative parity ground band above 11/2- and becomes the yrast at 15/2-. Lifetimes of all relevant states have been measured to follow the evolution of collectivity. Enhanced B(E2), B(E1) values as well as energetics provide evidences for superdeformation and existence of parity doublet cluster structure in an odd-A nucleus for the first time in A = 40 region. Large scale shell model calculations assign (sd)16(pf)3 as the origin of these states. Calculated spectroscopic factors correlate the SD states in 35Cl to those in 36Ar.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
Weak charge form factor and radius of 208Pb through parity violation in electron scattering
Authors:
C. J. Horowitz,
Z. Ahmed,
C. -M. Jen,
A. Rakhman,
P. A. Souder,
M. M. Dalton,
N. Liyanage,
K. D. Paschke,
K. Saenboonruang,
R. Silwal,
G. B. Franklin,
M. Friend,
B. Quinn,
K. S. Kumar,
J. M. Mammei,
D. McNulty,
L. Mercado,
S. Riordan,
J. Wexler,
R. W. Michaels,
G. M. Urciuoli
Abstract:
We use distorted wave electron scattering calculations to extract the weak charge form factor F_W(q), the weak charge radius R_W, and the point neutron radius R_n, of 208Pb from the PREX parity violating asymmetry measurement. The form factor is the Fourier transform of the weak charge density at the average momentum transfer q=0.475 fm$^{-1}$. We find F_W(q) =0.204 \pm 0.028 (exp) \pm 0.001 (mode…
▽ More
We use distorted wave electron scattering calculations to extract the weak charge form factor F_W(q), the weak charge radius R_W, and the point neutron radius R_n, of 208Pb from the PREX parity violating asymmetry measurement. The form factor is the Fourier transform of the weak charge density at the average momentum transfer q=0.475 fm$^{-1}$. We find F_W(q) =0.204 \pm 0.028 (exp) \pm 0.001 (model). We use the Helm model to infer the weak radius from F_W(q). We find R_W= 5.826 \pm 0.181 (exp) \pm 0.027 (model) fm. Here the exp error includes PREX statistical and systematic errors, while the model error describes the uncertainty in R_W from uncertainties in the surface thickness σof the weak charge density. The weak radius is larger than the charge radius, implying a "weak charge skin" where the surface region is relatively enriched in weak charges compared to (electromagnetic) charges. We extract the point neutron radius R_n=5.751 \pm 0.175 (exp) \pm 0.026 (model) \pm 0.005 (strange) fm$, from R_W. Here there is only a very small error (strange) from possible strange quark contributions. We find R_n to be slightly smaller than R_W because of the nucleon's size. Finally, we find a neutron skin thickness of R_n-R_p=0.302\pm 0.175 (exp) \pm 0.026 (model) \pm 0.005 (strange) fm, where R_p is the point proton radius.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2014; v1 submitted 7 February, 2012;
originally announced February 2012.
