Skip to main content

Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Gulshani, P

Searching in archive nucl-th. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2308.10026  [pdf

    nucl-th

    Microscopic triaxial cranking model: preliminary predictions for oscillator potential and light nuclei

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani, Alaaddine Lahbas

    Abstract: The conventional cranking model for uniaxial and triaxial rotation (CCRM3) is frequently used to study rotational features in deformed nuclei. However, CCRM3 is semi-classical and phenomenological because it uses a constant angular velocity, resulting in a number of Hamiltonian symmetry breakings. To investigate the effect of a dynamic angular velocity, a quantal, microscopic, D2, signature, and t… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

    Comments: 13 pages, 5 figures

  2. arXiv:2204.14207  [pdf

    nucl-th

    Predictions of conventional and microscopic triaxial cranking models for light nuclei

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani

    Abstract: The conventional cranking model for uniaxial rotation is frequently used to study rotational features in deformed nuclei. However, the model uses a constant angular velocity. To investigate the effect of a dynamic angular velocity, a quantal microscopic time-reversal and D2 invariant cranking model for triaxial rotation (MSCRM3) including residual correction terms is derived from a unitary transfo… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 March, 2023; v1 submitted 29 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

    Comments: 10 pages, 4 figures. The abstract, model derivation, and summary-conclusion section have been revised to clarify the results and conclusions drawn and make them more concise

  3. arXiv:1909.07169  [pdf

    nucl-th

    Microscopic quantum ideal triaxial rotor model and related self-consistent cranking model: slow-wobbling rotation in Ne-20

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani

    Abstract: A microscopic quantum ideal rotor-model intrinsic Hamiltonian for triaxial rotation is derived from the nuclear Schrodinger equation by applying a rotation operator to a deformed nuclear ground state. This Hamiltonian is obtained only when a rigid-flow prescription is used for the three rotation angles in the rotation operator. Using Hartree-Fock variational and second quantization methods, the ro… ▽ More

    Submitted 20 December, 2019; v1 submitted 16 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

    Comments: 23 pages, 2 figures. We have added three revisions to the previous versions on page 14: (i) On line 2 following Eq (56) we have added "compare the rigid-flow constraint in Eq (26)", (ii) in footnote 8 we have replace "right-hand side" by "left-hand-side", and (iii) in the last two lines, we have added the phrase "and from Eq (26) we conclude that". arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1810.11836

  4. arXiv:1810.11836  [pdf

    nucl-th

    Microscopic quantum ideal rotor model and related self-consistent cranking model, I: uni-axial rotation case

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani

    Abstract: A microscopic quantum ideal rotor-model Hamiltonian (distinct from that of Bohr's rotational model) is derived for a rotation about a single axis by applying a dynamic rotation operator to the deformed nuclear ground-state wavefunction. It is shown that the microscopic ideal rotor Hamiltonian is obtained only for a rigid-flow prescription for the rotation angle, with the attendant rigid-flow kinem… ▽ More

    Submitted 23 June, 2020; v1 submitted 28 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

    Comments: 20 pages, 3 figures, Eq.(32) has been corrected to include the square of the rotation angular velocity. This term was inadvertently omitted in the previous two versions of the article. Eq 24 page 8 is corrected by replacing omega by < J >

  5. arXiv:1708.03326  [pdf

    nucl-th

    A microscopic cranking model for uni-axial rotation with vanishing collective angular momentum

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani

    Abstract: The rigid-irrotational flow transformation in the previous microscopic cranking model (MCRM) for nuclear collective rotation about a single axis and its coupling to intrinsic motion is generalized. This generalization allow us to consider the limit of vanishingly small collective angular velocity and hence collective angular momentum while the collective moment of inertia remains finite. In this l… ▽ More

    Submitted 10 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

    Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1610.08337

  6. arXiv:1610.08337  [pdf

    nucl-th

    A microscopic rotational cranking model and its connection to conventional cranking and other collective rotational models

    Authors: P. Gulshani

    Abstract: A microscopic time-reversal invariant cranking model (MCRM) for nuclear collective rotation about a single axis and its coupling to intrinsic motion is derived. The MCRM is derived by transforming the stationary nuclear Schrodinger equation using a collective rotation-intrinsic product wavefunction, imposing no constraints on the wavefunction and the nucleon coordinates, and using no relative co-o… ▽ More

    Submitted 9 September, 2017; v1 submitted 26 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

    Comments: 23 pages, 6 figures, 58 references. Clarifying changes have been made to the article: 6 footnotes have been added; In Section 2, Eqs. (11), (13), (15), and (17) have been corrected, Sections 3, and 4 have been restructured to remove repetition, deleting the subsections; Figs 5 and 6 have been deleted; Some clarifying changes have been made to Sections 5 and 6

  7. arXiv:1609.04267  [pdf

    nucl-th

    A microscopic cranking model for nuclear collective rotation I: rigid-plus-irrotational-flow rotating frame

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani

    Abstract: We derive in a simple manner and from first principles the Inglis semi-classical phenomenological cranking model for nuclear collective rotation. The derivation transforms the nuclear Schrodinger equation (instead of the Hamiltonian) to a rotating frame using a product wavefunction and imposing no constraints on either the wavefunction or the nucleon motion. The difference from Inglis model is tha… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 September, 2016; v1 submitted 14 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

    Comments: 18 pages and 6 figures. Figs 3 and 4 in Rev 1 of the article erroneously showed data for constant potential-energy volume condition. These figures are now replaced by ones showing constant nuclear volume condition data for the conventional cranking model. Section 4.1 is accordingly revised to reflect this change

  8. arXiv:1602.01324  [pdf

    nucl-th

    A microscopic nuclear collective rotation-vibration model: 2D submodel

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani

    Abstract: We develop in this article a microscopic version of the successful phenomenological hydrodynamic Bohr-Davydov-Faessler-Greiner (BDFG) model for the collective rotation-vibration motion of a deformed nucleus. The model derivation is not limited to small oscillation amplitudes. The model generalizes the author's previous model to include interaction between collective oscillations in each pair of sp… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 July, 2016; v1 submitted 3 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

    Comments: 12 pages

  9. A microscopic derivation of nuclear collective rotation-vibration model, axially symmetric case

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani

    Abstract: We derive a microscopic version of the successful phenomenological hydrodynamic model of Bohr-Davydov-Faessler-Greiner for collective rotation-vibration motion of an axially symmetric deformed nucleus. The derivation is not limited to small oscillation amplitude. The nuclear Schrodinger equation is canonically transformed the to collective co-ordinates, which is then linearized using a constrained… ▽ More

    Submitted 12 May, 2015; v1 submitted 26 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

    Comments: The Rev 4 version of the article revises the Rev 3 version to: (i) reduce the size of the article by deleting some of the equations in Sections 2 and 3, (ii) to clarify the physical interpretation of the results in Eqs. (25) and (26), and the comparison of the model to the other models in Section 4, and (iii) to the add the results of the model application to another heavy nucleus

  10. arXiv:1407.3635  [pdf

    nucl-th

    Quantal self-consistent cranking model for monopole excitations in even-even light nuclei

    Authors: P. Gulshani

    Abstract: In this article, we derive a quantal self-consistent time-reversal invariant parameter-free cranking model for isoscalar monopole excitation coupled to intrinsic motion in even-even light nuclei. The model uses a wavefunction that is a product of monopole and intrinsic wavefunctions and a constrained variational method to derive, from a many-particle Schrodinger equation, a pair of coupled self-co… ▽ More

    Submitted 24 October, 2014; v1 submitted 14 July, 2014; originally announced July 2014.

    Comments: The statements added to the article on pages 1,2, 3, 6, and 10 clarifies why the model can be and is used to describe oscillations in spherical and deformed light nuclei. The reason is that the monopole nuclear radius coordinate used describeds overall nuclear deformation

  11. arXiv:1401.5328  [pdf

    nucl-th

    A microscopic quantal self-consistent cranking model for oscillations in spherical nuclei

    Authors: Parviz Gulshani

    Abstract: In this article, we transform the previously-derived microscopic rotational-model Schrodinger equation into a form suitable for describing oscillations-coupled-to-intrinsic motion in spherical nuclei. The resulting equation is decomposed into two coupled cranking-type equations, one for the oscillation and another for the intrinsic motion, using a product wavefunction and a constrained variational… ▽ More

    Submitted 25 February, 2014; v1 submitted 21 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

    Comments: 1. Added the new reference [59]. 2. Deleted an unnecessary paragraph in Section 1 on page 2. 3. Clarified footnote 1 in Section 2 page 3. 4. Deleted an unnecessary phrase in Section 6 page 12. 5. Added a phrase in Section 6 page 13. 6. Added a sentence in Section 7 page 16. 7. Corrected the font sizes of symbols throughout the article