Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Griffin, J J

The APEX/EPOS Quandary: the Way Out via Low Energy Studies

Authors: James J. Griffin

Abstract: A scorecard summary of the various data of the ``Sharp Lepton Problem'' is presented. The present situation, in which APEX reports ``...no evidence for sharp pairs...'' even as their data exhibits a sharp pair excess near 800 keV, is discussed. Two kinds of low energy experiments utilizing non-heavy ion processes are suggested as means to break the impasse arising from the ambiguity of the prese… ▽ More A scorecard summary of the various data of the ``Sharp Lepton Problem'' is presented. The present situation, in which APEX reports ``...no evidence for sharp pairs...'' even as their data exhibits a sharp pair excess near 800 keV, is discussed. Two kinds of low energy experiments utilizing non-heavy ion processes are suggested as means to break the impasse arising from the ambiguity of the present heavy ion data. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 1998; v1 submitted 16 February, 1998; originally announced February 1998.

Comments: 11 pages, LaTex2E, 4 (epsfig) postscript figures in text

Report number: U. MD PP 98-045

Journal ref: Proc. 8th Int'l Conf. on Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, Varenna, Italy, June 9-14, 1997, pp. 493-502; ed. E. Gadioli

Comment on "A Search for Narrow Sum Energy Lines in Electron-Positron Pair Emission from Heavy Ion collisions near the Coulomb Barrier"

Authors: James J. Griffin

Abstract: The report of Ahmad et al., states that ``No evidence is found for sharp peaks in the present data.'' But this statement is factually inaccurate. Figure 1 exhibits the APEX' published U + Th ``wedge cut'' data, and background, which show a distinct (3.2 sigma) maximum of 83 excess pair counts in the 20 keV bin near 790 keV. A one-gaussian best fit to this excess reduces chi-squared (for the 21 b… ▽ More The report of Ahmad et al., states that ``No evidence is found for sharp peaks in the present data.'' But this statement is factually inaccurate. Figure 1 exhibits the APEX' published U + Th ``wedge cut'' data, and background, which show a distinct (3.2 sigma) maximum of 83 excess pair counts in the 20 keV bin near 790 keV. A one-gaussian best fit to this excess reduces chi-squared (for the 21 bins from 500 to 920 keV) by 12.6 from 28.3 to 16.7, and the reduced chi-squared value from 1.41 to 0.98. Furthermore, at the 99% Confidence Level, the data impose lower and upper bounds of (24, 146) respectively upon the mean excess pair count in this bin. This data therefore provides positive, statistically significant evidence for sharp pairs near 790 keV. Whether this evidence is compelling is a separate question not addressed here. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 1997; originally announced March 1997.

Comments: 5 pages, 1 postscript figure, Revtex style, submitted to Phys.Rev.Lett.; related analyses in nucl-th/9703006

Report number: DOE/ER/40762-112; U.0f MD PP#97-087

APEX: Positive evidence for sharp 800 keV pairs from heavy ion collisions near the Coulomb barrier

Authors: James J. Griffin

Abstract: The best fit to the published APEX U+Th data describes a sharp line of 123 pairs of width 23 keV at 793$\pm$7 keV; also, the data impose a positive 99.0%CL lower bound of 23 sharp pairs. It is therefore untenable to argue from the APEX data against the existence of sharp pairs. Data-only ratios APEX/EPOS pair counts show empirically that the two experiments' pair data are mutually consistent and… ▽ More The best fit to the published APEX U+Th data describes a sharp line of 123 pairs of width 23 keV at 793$\pm$7 keV; also, the data impose a positive 99.0%CL lower bound of 23 sharp pairs. It is therefore untenable to argue from the APEX data against the existence of sharp pairs. Data-only ratios APEX/EPOS pair counts show empirically that the two experiments' pair data are mutually consistent and of comparable statistical potency: conflicts, if any, can be resolved only by other independent evidence. A perspective is offered on the current status of the Sharp Lepton Problem, and alternative non-heavy-ion experimental approaches to it are recommended. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 1997; v1 submitted 3 March, 1997; originally announced March 1997.

Comments: 26 pages, 4 postscript figures, Revtex style, submitted to Phys. Rev.C, replaced to include omitted references, no other changes

Report number: DOE/ER/40762-115; U.of MD PP #97-080

The Doppler Paradigm and the APEX-EPOS-ORANGE Quandary

Authors: James J. Griffin

Abstract: The experimental detection of the sharp lines of the \ee Puzzle is viewed as a struggle against Doppler broadening. Gedanken experiments which are realistic in zeroth order of detail are analyzed to show that the ORANGE and EPOS/I geometries select narrower slices of a Doppler broadened line than spherically inclusive (APEX and EPOS/II --like) apparati. Roughly speaking, the latter require event… ▽ More The experimental detection of the sharp lines of the \ee Puzzle is viewed as a struggle against Doppler broadening. Gedanken experiments which are realistic in zeroth order of detail are analyzed to show that the ORANGE and EPOS/I geometries select narrower slices of a Doppler broadened line than spherically inclusive (APEX and EPOS/II --like) apparati. Roughly speaking, the latter require event-by-event Doppler reconstruction simply to regain an even footing with the former. This suggests that APEX' or EPOS/II's coincident pair distributions must be statistically superior to those of EPOS/I or ORANGE in order to support a comparable inference about sharp structure. Under present circumstances, independent alternative data is invaluable. Therefore, a corroboration of Sakai's 330.1 keV ($<$ 3 keV wide) electron line in few MeV $e^+$ or $e^-$ bombardments of U and Th targets could prove crucial. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 1996; originally announced January 1996.

Comments: 12 pages, latex, no figures

Report number: U.of MD.PP#96043

Journal ref: Acta Phys.Polon. B27 (1996) 2087-2098