-
Multidisciplinary Science in the Multimessenger Era
Authors:
Eric Burns,
Christopher L. Fryer,
Ivan Agullo,
Jennifer Andrews,
Elias Aydi,
Matthew G. Baring,
Eddie Baron,
Peter G. Boorman,
Mohammad Ali Boroumand,
Eric Borowski,
Floor S. Broekgaarden,
Poonam Chandra,
Emmanouil Chatzopoulos,
Hsin-Yu Chen,
Kelly A. Chipps,
Francesca Civano,
Luca Comisso,
Alejandro Cárdenas-Avendaño,
Phong Dang,
Catherine M. Deibel,
Tarraneh Eftekhari,
Courey Elliott,
Ryan J. Foley,
Christopher J. Fontes,
Amy Gall
, et al. (60 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Astrophysical observations of the cosmos allow us to probe extreme physics and answer foundational questions on our universe. Modern astronomy is increasingly operating under a holistic approach, probing the same question with multiple diagnostics including how sources vary over time, how they appear across the electromagnetic spectrum, and through their other signatures, including gravitational w…
▽ More
Astrophysical observations of the cosmos allow us to probe extreme physics and answer foundational questions on our universe. Modern astronomy is increasingly operating under a holistic approach, probing the same question with multiple diagnostics including how sources vary over time, how they appear across the electromagnetic spectrum, and through their other signatures, including gravitational waves, neutrinos, cosmic rays, and dust on Earth. Astrophysical observations are now reaching the point where approximate physics models are insufficient. Key sources of interest are explosive transients, whose understanding requires multidisciplinary studies at the intersection of astrophysics, gravity, nuclear science, plasma physics, fluid dynamics and turbulence, computation, particle physics, atomic, molecular, and optical science, condensed matter and materials science, radiation transport, and high energy density physics. This white paper provides an overview of the major scientific advances that lay at the intersection of physics and astronomy and are best probed through time-domain and multimessenger astrophysics, an exploration of how multidisciplinary science can be fostered, and introductory descriptions of the relevant scientific disciplines and key astrophysical sources of interest.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2025; v1 submitted 5 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Horizons: Nuclear Astrophysics in the 2020s and Beyond
Authors:
H. Schatz,
A. D. Becerril Reyes,
A. Best,
E. F. Brown,
K. Chatziioannou,
K. A. Chipps,
C. M. Deibel,
R. Ezzeddine,
D. K. Galloway,
C. J. Hansen,
F. Herwig,
A. P. Ji,
M. Lugaro,
Z. Meisel,
D. Norman,
J. S. Read,
L. F. Roberts,
A. Spyrou,
I. Tews,
F. X. Timmes,
C. Travaglio,
N. Vassh,
C. Abia,
P. Adsley,
S. Agarwal
, et al. (140 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Nuclear Astrophysics is a field at the intersection of nuclear physics and astrophysics, which seeks to understand the nuclear engines of astronomical objects and the origin of the chemical elements. This white paper summarizes progress and status of the field, the new open questions that have emerged, and the tremendous scientific opportunities that have opened up with major advances in capabilit…
▽ More
Nuclear Astrophysics is a field at the intersection of nuclear physics and astrophysics, which seeks to understand the nuclear engines of astronomical objects and the origin of the chemical elements. This white paper summarizes progress and status of the field, the new open questions that have emerged, and the tremendous scientific opportunities that have opened up with major advances in capabilities across an ever growing number of disciplines and subfields that need to be integrated. We take a holistic view of the field discussing the unique challenges and opportunities in nuclear astrophysics in regards to science, diversity, education, and the interdisciplinarity and breadth of the field. Clearly nuclear astrophysics is a dynamic field with a bright future that is entering a new era of discovery opportunities.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
$s$-wave scattering lengths for the $^7$Be+p system from an $\textit{R}$-matrix analysis
Authors:
S. N. Paneru,
C. R. Brune,
R. Giri,
R. J. Livesay,
U. Greife,
J. C. Blackmon,
D. W. Bardayan,
K. A. Chipps,
B. Davids,
D. S. Connolly,
K. Y. Chae,
A. E. Champagne,
C. Deibel,
K. L. Jones,
M. S. Johnson,
R. L. Kozub,
Z. Ma,
C. D. Nesaraja,
S. D. Pain,
F. Sarazin,
J. F. Shriner Jr.,
D. W. Stracener,
M. S. Smith,
J. S. Thomas,
D. W. Visser
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The astrophysical $S$-factor for the radiative proton capture reaction on $^7$Be ($S_{17}$) at low energies is affected by the $s$-wave scattering lengths. We report the measurement of elastic and inelastic scattering cross sections for the $^7$Be+p system in the center-of-mass energy range 0.474 - 2.740 MeV and center-of-mass angular range of 70$^\circ$- 150$^\circ$. A radioactive $^7$Be beam pro…
▽ More
The astrophysical $S$-factor for the radiative proton capture reaction on $^7$Be ($S_{17}$) at low energies is affected by the $s$-wave scattering lengths. We report the measurement of elastic and inelastic scattering cross sections for the $^7$Be+p system in the center-of-mass energy range 0.474 - 2.740 MeV and center-of-mass angular range of 70$^\circ$- 150$^\circ$. A radioactive $^7$Be beam produced at Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL) Holifield Radioactive Ion Beam Facility was accelerated and bombarded a thin polypropylene (CH$_{2}$)$_\text n$ target. Scattered ions were detected in the segmented Silicon Detector Array. Using an $\textit{R}$-matrix analysis of ORNL and Louvain-la-Neuve cross section data, the $s$-wave scattering lengths for channel spins 1 and 2 were determined to be 17.34$^{+1.11}_{-1.33}$ and -3.18$^{+0.55}_{-0.50}$ fm, respectively. The uncertainty in the $s$-wave scattering lengths reported in this work is smaller by a factor of 5-8 compared to the previous measurement, which may reduce the overall uncertainty in $S_{17}$ at zero energy. The level structure of $^8$B is discussed based upon the results from this work. Evidence for the existence of 0$^+$ and 2$^+$ levels in $^8$B at 1.9 and 2.21 MeV, respectively, is observed.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2019; v1 submitted 1 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Understanding emergent collectivity and clustering in nuclei from a symmetry-based no-core shell-model perspective
Authors:
A. C. Dreyfuss,
K. D. Launey,
T. Dytrych,
J. P. Draayer,
R. B. Baker,
C. M. Deibel,
C. Bahri
Abstract:
We present a detailed discussion of the structure of the low-lying positive-parity energy spectrum of $^{12}$C from a no-core shell-model perspective. The approach utilizes a fraction of the usual shell-model space and extends its multi-shell reach via the symmetry-based no-core symplectic shell model (NCSpM) with a simple, physically-informed effective interaction. We focus on the ground-state ro…
▽ More
We present a detailed discussion of the structure of the low-lying positive-parity energy spectrum of $^{12}$C from a no-core shell-model perspective. The approach utilizes a fraction of the usual shell-model space and extends its multi-shell reach via the symmetry-based no-core symplectic shell model (NCSpM) with a simple, physically-informed effective interaction. We focus on the ground-state rotational band, the Hoyle state and its $2^+$ and $4^+$ excitations, as well as the giant monopole $0^+$ resonance, which is a vibrational breathing mode of the ground state. This, in turn, allows us to address the open question about the structure of the Hoyle state and its rotational band. In particular, we find that the Hoyle state is best described through deformed prolate collective modes rather than vibrational modes, while we show that the higher-lying giant monopole $0^+$ resonance resembles the oblate deformation of the $^{12}$C ground state. In addition, we identify the giant monopole $0^+$ and quadrupole $2^+$ resonances of selected light and intermediate-mass nuclei, along with other observables of $^{12}$C, including matter rms radii, electric quadrupole moments, as well as $E2$ and $E0$ transition rates.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
