-
Entanglement Maximization and Mirror Symmetry in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models
Authors:
Marcela Carena,
Guglielmo Coloretti,
Wanqiang Liu,
Mira Littmann,
Ian Low,
Carlos E. M. Wagner
Abstract:
We consider 2-to-2 scatterings of Higgs bosons in a CP-conserving two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM) and study the implication of maximizing the entanglement in the flavor space, where the two doublets $Φ_a$, $a=1,2$, can be viewed as a qubit: $Φ_1=|0\rangle$ and $Φ_2=|1\rangle$. More specifically, we compute the scattering amplitudes for $Φ_a Φ_b \to Φ_c Φ_d$ and require the outgoing flavor entanglem…
▽ More
We consider 2-to-2 scatterings of Higgs bosons in a CP-conserving two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM) and study the implication of maximizing the entanglement in the flavor space, where the two doublets $Φ_a$, $a=1,2$, can be viewed as a qubit: $Φ_1=|0\rangle$ and $Φ_2=|1\rangle$. More specifically, we compute the scattering amplitudes for $Φ_a Φ_b \to Φ_c Φ_d$ and require the outgoing flavor entanglement to be maximal for a full product basis such as the computational basis, which consists of $\{|00\rangle,|01\rangle,|10\rangle,|11\rangle\}$. In the unbroken phase and turning off the gauge interactions, entanglement maximization results in the appearance of an $U(2)\times U(2)$ global symmetry among the quartic couplings, which in general is broken softly by the mass terms. Interestingly, once the Higgs bosons acquire vacuum expectation values, maximal entanglement enforces an exact $U(2) \times U(2)$ symmetry, which is spontaneously broken to $U(1)\times U(1)$. As a byproduct, this gives rise to Higgs alignment as well as to the existence of 6 massless Nambu-Goldstone bosons. The $U(2)\times U(2)$ symmetry can be gauged to lift the massless Goldstones, while maintaining maximal entanglement demands the presence of a discrete $\mathrm{Z}_2$ symmetry interchanging the two gauge sectors. The model is custodially invariant in the scalar sector, and the inclusion of fermions requires a mirror dark sector, related to the standard one by the $\mathrm{Z}_2$ symmetry.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Quantum Simulation for High Energy Physics
Authors:
Christian W. Bauer,
Zohreh Davoudi,
A. Baha Balantekin,
Tanmoy Bhattacharya,
Marcela Carena,
Wibe A. de Jong,
Patrick Draper,
Aida El-Khadra,
Nate Gemelke,
Masanori Hanada,
Dmitri Kharzeev,
Henry Lamm,
Ying-Ying Li,
Junyu Liu,
Mikhail Lukin,
Yannick Meurice,
Christopher Monroe,
Benjamin Nachman,
Guido Pagano,
John Preskill,
Enrico Rinaldi,
Alessandro Roggero,
David I. Santiago,
Martin J. Savage,
Irfan Siddiqi
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
It is for the first time that Quantum Simulation for High Energy Physics (HEP) is studied in the U.S. decadal particle-physics community planning, and in fact until recently, this was not considered a mainstream topic in the community. This fact speaks of a remarkable rate of growth of this subfield over the past few years, stimulated by the impressive advancements in Quantum Information Sciences…
▽ More
It is for the first time that Quantum Simulation for High Energy Physics (HEP) is studied in the U.S. decadal particle-physics community planning, and in fact until recently, this was not considered a mainstream topic in the community. This fact speaks of a remarkable rate of growth of this subfield over the past few years, stimulated by the impressive advancements in Quantum Information Sciences (QIS) and associated technologies over the past decade, and the significant investment in this area by the government and private sectors in the U.S. and other countries. High-energy physicists have quickly identified problems of importance to our understanding of nature at the most fundamental level, from tiniest distances to cosmological extents, that are intractable with classical computers but may benefit from quantum advantage. They have initiated, and continue to carry out, a vigorous program in theory, algorithm, and hardware co-design for simulations of relevance to the HEP mission. This community whitepaper is an attempt to bring this exciting and yet challenging area of research to the spotlight, and to elaborate on what the promises, requirements, challenges, and potential solutions are over the next decade and beyond.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Project X: Physics Opportunities
Authors:
Andreas S. Kronfeld,
Robert S. Tschirhart,
Usama Al-Binni,
Wolfgang Altmannshofer,
Charles Ankenbrandt,
Kaladi Babu,
Sunanda Banerjee,
Matthew Bass,
Brian Batell,
David V. Baxter,
Zurab Berezhiani,
Marc Bergevin,
Robert Bernstein,
Sudeb Bhattacharya,
Mary Bishai,
Thomas Blum,
S. Alex Bogacz,
Stephen J. Brice,
Joachim Brod,
Alan Bross,
Michael Buchoff,
Thomas W. Burgess,
Marcela Carena,
Luis A. Castellanos,
Subhasis Chattopadhyay
, et al. (111 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Part 2 of "Project X: Accelerator Reference Design, Physics Opportunities, Broader Impacts". In this Part, we outline the particle-physics program that can be achieved with Project X, a staged superconducting linac for intensity-frontier particle physics. Topics include neutrino physics, kaon physics, muon physics, electric dipole moments, neutron-antineutron oscillations, new light particles, had…
▽ More
Part 2 of "Project X: Accelerator Reference Design, Physics Opportunities, Broader Impacts". In this Part, we outline the particle-physics program that can be achieved with Project X, a staged superconducting linac for intensity-frontier particle physics. Topics include neutrino physics, kaon physics, muon physics, electric dipole moments, neutron-antineutron oscillations, new light particles, hadron structure, hadron spectroscopy, and lattice-QCD calculations. Part 1 is available as arXiv:1306.5022 [physics.acc-ph] and Part 3 is available as arXiv:1306.5024 [physics.acc-ph].
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2016; v1 submitted 20 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
