-
Neutrino Theory in the Precision Era
Authors:
Asmaa Abada,
Gabriela Barenboim,
Toni Bertólez-Martínez,
Sandipan Bhattacherjee,
Sara Bolognesi,
Patrick D. Bolton,
Nilay Bostan,
Gustavo C. Branco,
Sabya Sachi Chatterjee,
Adriano Cherchiglia,
Marco Chianese,
B. A. Couto e Silva,
Peter B. Denton,
Stephen Dolan,
Marco Drewes,
Ilham El Atmani,
Miguel Escudero,
Ivan Esteban,
Manuel Ettengruber,
Enrique Fernández-Martínez,
Julien Froustey,
Raj Gandhi,
Julia Gehrlein,
Srubabati Goswami,
André de Gouvêa
, et al. (54 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This document summarises discussions on future directions in theoretical neutrino physics, which are the outcome of a neutrino theory workshop held at CERN in February 2025. The starting point is the realisation that neutrino physics offers unique opportunities to address some of the most fundamental questions in physics. This motivates a vigorous experimental programme which the theory community…
▽ More
This document summarises discussions on future directions in theoretical neutrino physics, which are the outcome of a neutrino theory workshop held at CERN in February 2025. The starting point is the realisation that neutrino physics offers unique opportunities to address some of the most fundamental questions in physics. This motivates a vigorous experimental programme which the theory community fully supports. \textbf{A strong effort in theoretical neutrino physics is paramount to optimally take advantage of upcoming neutrino experiments and to explore the synergies with other areas of particle, astroparticle, and nuclear physics, as well as cosmology.} Progress on the theory side has the potential to significantly boost the physics reach of experiments, as well as go well beyond their original scope. Strong collaboration between theory and experiment is essential in the precision era. To foster such collaboration, \textbf{we propose to establish a CERN Neutrino Physics Centre.} Taking inspiration from the highly successful LHC Physics Center at Fermilab, the CERN Neutrino Physics Centre would be the European hub of the neutrino community, covering experimental and theoretical activities.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Impact of cross-section uncertainties on supernova neutrino spectral parameter fitting in the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment
Authors:
DUNE Collaboration,
A. Abed Abud,
B. Abi,
R. Acciarri,
M. A. Acero,
M. R. Adames,
G. Adamov,
M. Adamowski,
D. Adams,
M. Adinolfi,
C. Adriano,
A. Aduszkiewicz,
J. Aguilar,
Z. Ahmad,
J. Ahmed,
B. Aimard,
F. Akbar,
K. Allison,
S. Alonso Monsalve,
M. Alrashed,
A. Alton,
R. Alvarez,
P. Amedo,
J. Anderson,
D. A. Andrade
, et al. (1294 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A primary goal of the upcoming Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) is to measure the $\mathcal{O}(10)$ MeV neutrinos produced by a Galactic core-collapse supernova if one should occur during the lifetime of the experiment. The liquid-argon-based detectors planned for DUNE are expected to be uniquely sensitive to the $ν_e$ component of the supernova flux, enabling a wide variety of physics…
▽ More
A primary goal of the upcoming Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) is to measure the $\mathcal{O}(10)$ MeV neutrinos produced by a Galactic core-collapse supernova if one should occur during the lifetime of the experiment. The liquid-argon-based detectors planned for DUNE are expected to be uniquely sensitive to the $ν_e$ component of the supernova flux, enabling a wide variety of physics and astrophysics measurements. A key requirement for a correct interpretation of these measurements is a good understanding of the energy-dependent total cross section $σ(E_ν)$ for charged-current $ν_e$ absorption on argon. In the context of a simulated extraction of supernova $ν_e$ spectral parameters from a toy analysis, we investigate the impact of $σ(E_ν)$ modeling uncertainties on DUNE's supernova neutrino physics sensitivity for the first time. We find that the currently large theoretical uncertainties on $σ(E_ν)$ must be substantially reduced before the $ν_e$ flux parameters can be extracted reliably: in the absence of external constraints, a measurement of the integrated neutrino luminosity with less than 10\% bias with DUNE requires $σ(E_ν)$ to be known to about 5%. The neutrino spectral shape parameters can be known to better than 10% for a 20% uncertainty on the cross-section scale, although they will be sensitive to uncertainties on the shape of $σ(E_ν)$. A direct measurement of low-energy $ν_e$-argon scattering would be invaluable for improving the theoretical precision to the needed level.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2023; v1 submitted 29 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Light Sterile Neutrinos: A White Paper
Authors:
K. N. Abazajian,
M. A. Acero,
S. K. Agarwalla,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
C. H. Albright,
S. Antusch,
C. A. Arguelles,
A. B. Balantekin,
G. Barenboim,
V. Barger,
P. Bernardini,
F. Bezrukov,
O. E. Bjaelde,
S. A. Bogacz,
N. S. Bowden,
A. Boyarsky,
A. Bravar,
D. Bravo Berguno,
S. J. Brice,
A. D. Bross,
B. Caccianiga,
F. Cavanna,
E. J. Chun,
B. T. Cleveland,
A. P. Collin
, et al. (162 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper addresses the hypothesis of light sterile neutrinos based on recent anomalies observed in neutrino experiments and the latest astrophysical data.
This white paper addresses the hypothesis of light sterile neutrinos based on recent anomalies observed in neutrino experiments and the latest astrophysical data.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
CPT Violation and the Nature of Neutrinos
Authors:
G. Barenboim,
J. F. Beacom,
L. Borissov,
B. Kayser
Abstract:
In order to accommodate the neutrino oscillation signals from the solar, atmospheric, and LSND data, a sterile fourth neutrino is generally invoked, though the fits to the data are becoming more and more constrained. However, it has recently been shown that the data can be explained with only three neutrinos, if one invokes CPT violation to allow different masses and mixing angles for neutrinos…
▽ More
In order to accommodate the neutrino oscillation signals from the solar, atmospheric, and LSND data, a sterile fourth neutrino is generally invoked, though the fits to the data are becoming more and more constrained. However, it has recently been shown that the data can be explained with only three neutrinos, if one invokes CPT violation to allow different masses and mixing angles for neutrinos and antineutrinos. We explore the nature of neutrinos in such CPT-violating scenarios. Majorana neutrino masses are allowed, but in general, there are no longer Majorana neutrinos in the conventional sense. However, CPT-violating models still have interesting consequences for neutrinoless double beta decay. Compared to the usual case, while the larger mass scale (from LSND) may appear, a greater degree of suppression can also occur.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2002;
originally announced March 2002.
-
Relativistic Two-Body Processes in Axial-Charge Transitions
Authors:
E. D. Izquierdo,
G. Barenboim,
A. O. Gattone
Abstract:
We study the contribution of two-body meson-exchange processes to axial charge transitions for nuclei in the lead, tin and oxygen regions. We conduct calculations in the Dirac-Hartree (the Walecka model) and the relativistic Hartree (where the full one-nucleon-loop effects are included) approximations. We present results indicating that one- and two-body processes enhance the matrix elements of…
▽ More
We study the contribution of two-body meson-exchange processes to axial charge transitions for nuclei in the lead, tin and oxygen regions. We conduct calculations in the Dirac-Hartree (the Walecka model) and the relativistic Hartree (where the full one-nucleon-loop effects are included) approximations. We present results indicating that one- and two-body processes enhance the matrix elements of the axial-charge operator by some (100+-20)% in all three regions studied. This agrees well with the fit of eighteen first-forbidden beta-decay transitions conducted by Warburton in the lead region. We also discuss some sensitivities present in the calculation.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 1995;
originally announced April 1995.
