-
First Evidence of Axial Shape Asymmetry and Configuration Coexistence in $^{74}$Zn: Suggestion for a Northern Extension of the $N=40$ Island of Inversion
Authors:
M. Rocchini,
P. E. Garrett,
M. Zielinska,
S. M. Lenzi,
D. D. Dao,
F. Nowacki,
V. Bildstein,
A. D. MacLean,
B. Olaizola,
Z. T. Ahmed,
C. Andreoiu,
A. Babu,
G. C. Ball,
S. S. Bhattacharjee,
H. Bidaman,
C. Cheng,
R. Coleman,
I. Dillmann,
A. B. Garnsworthy,
S. Gillespie,
C. J. Griffin,
G. F. Grinyer,
G. Hackman,
M. Hanley,
A. Illana
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The excited states of $N=44$ $^{74}$Zn were investigated via $γ$-ray spectroscopy following $^{74}$Cu $β$ decay. By exploiting $γ$-$γ$ angular correlation analysis, the $2_2^+$, $3_1^+$, $0_2^+$ and $2_3^+$ states in $^{74}$Zn were firmly established. The $γ$-ray branching and $E2/M1$ mixing ratios for transitions de-exciting the $2_2^+$, $3_1^+$ and $2_3^+$ states were measured, allowing for the…
▽ More
The excited states of $N=44$ $^{74}$Zn were investigated via $γ$-ray spectroscopy following $^{74}$Cu $β$ decay. By exploiting $γ$-$γ$ angular correlation analysis, the $2_2^+$, $3_1^+$, $0_2^+$ and $2_3^+$ states in $^{74}$Zn were firmly established. The $γ$-ray branching and $E2/M1$ mixing ratios for transitions de-exciting the $2_2^+$, $3_1^+$ and $2_3^+$ states were measured, allowing for the extraction of relative $B(E2)$ values. In particular, the $2_3^+ \to 0_2^+$ and $2_3^+ \to 4_1^+$ transitions were observed for the first time. The results show excellent agreement with new microscopic large-scale shell-model calculations, and are discussed in terms of underlying shapes, as well as the role of neutron excitations across the $N=40$ gap. Enhanced axial shape asymmetry (triaxiality) is suggested to characterize $^{74}$Zn in its ground state. Furthermore, an excited $K=0$ band with a significantly larger softness in its shape is identified. A shore of the $N=40$ ``island of inversion'' appears to manifest above $Z=26$, previously thought as its northern limit in the chart of the nuclides.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Measurement of Compton scattering at MAMI for the extraction of the electric and magnetic polarizabilities of the proton
Authors:
A2 Collaboration,
E. Mornacchi,
P. P. Martel,
S. Abt,
P. Achenbach,
P. Adlarson,
F. Afzal,
Z. Ahmed,
J. R. M. Annand,
H. J. Arends,
M. Bashkanov,
R. Beck,
M. Biroth,
N. Borisov,
A. Braghieri,
W. J. Briscoe,
F. Cividini,
C. Collicott,
S. Costanza,
A. Denig,
A. S. Dolzhikov,
E. J. Downie,
P. Drexler,
S. Fegan,
S. Gardner
, et al. (43 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A precise measurement of the differential cross-sections $dσ/dΩ$ and the linearly polarized photon beam asymmetry $Σ_3$ for Compton scattering on the proton below pion threshold has been performed with a tagged photon beam and almost $4π$ detector at the Mainz Microtron. The incident photons were produced by the recently upgraded Glasgow-Mainz photon tagging facility and impinged on a cryogenic li…
▽ More
A precise measurement of the differential cross-sections $dσ/dΩ$ and the linearly polarized photon beam asymmetry $Σ_3$ for Compton scattering on the proton below pion threshold has been performed with a tagged photon beam and almost $4π$ detector at the Mainz Microtron. The incident photons were produced by the recently upgraded Glasgow-Mainz photon tagging facility and impinged on a cryogenic liquid hydrogen target, with the scattered photons detected in the Crystal Ball/TAPS set-up. Using the highest statistics Compton scattering data ever measured on the proton along with two effective field theories (both covariant baryon and heavy-baryon) and one fixed-$t$ dispersion relation model, constraining the fits with the Baldin sum rule, we have obtained the proton electric and magnetic polarizabilities with unprecedented precision: \begin{align*}
&{}α_{E1} = 10.99 \pm 0.16 \pm 0.47 \pm 0.17 \pm 0.34
&{}β_{M1} = 3.14 \pm 0.21 \pm 0.24 \pm 0.20 \pm 0.35 \end{align*} in units of $10^{-4}$\,fm$^3$ where the errors are statistical, systematic, spin polarizability dependent and model dependent.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2022; v1 submitted 29 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Single $π^0$ Production Off Neutrons Bound in Deuteron with Linearly Polarized Photons
Authors:
C. Mullen,
S. Gardner,
D. I. Glazier,
S. J. D. Kay,
K. Livingston,
I. I. Strakovsky,
R. L. Workman,
S. Abt,
P. Achenbach,
F. Afzal,
Z. Ahmed,
C. S. Akondi,
J. R. M. Annand,
M. Bashkanov,
R. Beck,
M. Biroth,
N. S. Borisov,
A. Braghieri,
W. J. Briscoe,
F. Cividini,
C. Collicott,
S. Costanza,
A. Denig,
M. Dieterle,
E. J. Downie
, et al. (57 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The quasifree $\overrightarrowγ d\toπ^0n(p)$ photon beam asymmetry, $Σ$, has been measured at photon energies, $E_γ$, from 390 to 610 MeV, corresponding to center of mass energy from 1.271 to 1.424 GeV, for the first time. The data were collected in the A2 hall of the MAMI electron beam facility with the Crystal Ball and TAPS calorimeters covering pion center-of-mass angles from 49 to 148$^\circ$.…
▽ More
The quasifree $\overrightarrowγ d\toπ^0n(p)$ photon beam asymmetry, $Σ$, has been measured at photon energies, $E_γ$, from 390 to 610 MeV, corresponding to center of mass energy from 1.271 to 1.424 GeV, for the first time. The data were collected in the A2 hall of the MAMI electron beam facility with the Crystal Ball and TAPS calorimeters covering pion center-of-mass angles from 49 to 148$^\circ$. In this kinematic region, polarization observables are sensitive to contributions from the $Δ(1232)$ and $N(1440)$ resonances. The extracted values of $Σ$ have been compared to predictions based on partial-wave analyses (PWAs) of the existing pion photoproduction database. Our comparison includes the SAID, MAID, and Bonn-Gatchina analyses; while a revised SAID fit, including the new $Σ$ measurements, has also been performed. In addition, isospin symmetry is examined as a way to predict $π^0n$ photoproduction observables, based on fits to published data in the channels $π^0p$, $π^+n$, and $π^-p$.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2021; v1 submitted 15 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Ruling out color transparency in quasi-elastic $^{12}$C(e,e'p) up to $Q^2$ of 14.2 (GeV/c)$^2$
Authors:
D. Bhetuwal,
J. Matter,
H. Szumila-Vance,
M. L. Kabir,
D. Dutta,
R. Ent,
D. Abrams,
Z. Ahmed,
B. Aljawrneh,
S. Alsalmi,
R. Ambrose,
D. Androic,
W. Armstrong,
A. Asaturyan,
K. Assumin-Gyimah,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
A. Bandari,
S. Basnet,
V. Berdnikov,
H. Bhatt,
D. Biswas,
W. U. Boeglin,
P. Bosted,
E. Brash,
M. H. S. Bukhari
, et al. (65 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Quasielastic $^{12}$C$(e,e'p)$ scattering was measured at space-like 4-momentum transfer squared $Q^2$~=~8, 9.4, 11.4, and 14.2 (GeV/c)$^2$, the highest ever achieved to date. Nuclear transparency for this reaction was extracted by comparing the measured yield to that expected from a plane-wave impulse approximation calculation without any final state interactions. The measured transparency was co…
▽ More
Quasielastic $^{12}$C$(e,e'p)$ scattering was measured at space-like 4-momentum transfer squared $Q^2$~=~8, 9.4, 11.4, and 14.2 (GeV/c)$^2$, the highest ever achieved to date. Nuclear transparency for this reaction was extracted by comparing the measured yield to that expected from a plane-wave impulse approximation calculation without any final state interactions. The measured transparency was consistent with no $Q^2$ dependence, up to proton momenta of 8.5~GeV/c, ruling out the quantum chromodynamics effect of color transparency at the measured $Q^2$ scales in exclusive $(e,e'p)$ reactions. These results impose strict constraints on models of color transparency for protons.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2021; v1 submitted 1 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Cross Section for $γn \to π^0 n$ measured at Mainz/A2
Authors:
W. J. Briscoe,
M. Hadzimehmedovi,
A. E. Kudryavtsev,
V. V. Kulikov,
M. A. Martemianov,
I. I. Strakovsky,
A. Svarc,
V. E. Tarasov,
R. L. Workman,
S. Abt,
P. Achenbach,
C. S. Akondi,
F. Afzal,
P. Aguar-Bartolome,
Z. Ahmed,
J. R. M. Annand,
H. J. Arends,
K. Bantawa,
M. Bashkanov,
R. Beck,
M. Biroth,
N. Borisov,
A. Braghieri,
S. A. Bulychjov,
F. Cividini
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The $γn \to π^0 n$ differential cross section evaluated for 27 energy bins span the photon-energy range 290-813 MeV (W = 1.195-1.553 GeV) and the pion c.m. polar production angles, ranging from 18 deg to 162 deg, making use of model-dependent nuclear corrections to extract pi0 production data on the neutron from measurements on the deuteron target. Additionally, the total photoabsorption cross sec…
▽ More
The $γn \to π^0 n$ differential cross section evaluated for 27 energy bins span the photon-energy range 290-813 MeV (W = 1.195-1.553 GeV) and the pion c.m. polar production angles, ranging from 18 deg to 162 deg, making use of model-dependent nuclear corrections to extract pi0 production data on the neutron from measurements on the deuteron target. Additionally, the total photoabsorption cross section was measured. The tagged photon beam produced by the 883-MeV electron beam of the Mainz Microtron MAMI was used for the 0-meson production. Our accumulation of 3.6 x 10^6 $γn \to π^0 n$ events allowed a detailed study of the reaction dynamics. Our data are in reasonable agreement with previous A2 measurements and extend them to lower energies. The data are compared to predictions of previous SAID, MAID, and BnGa partial-wave analyses and to the latest SAID fit MA19 that included our data. Selected photon decay amplitudes $N^* \to γn$ at the resonance poles are determined for the first time.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Pion and Kaon Structure at the Electron-Ion Collider
Authors:
Arlene C. Aguilar,
Zafir Ahmed,
Christine Aidala,
Salina Ali,
Vincent Andrieux,
John Arrington,
Adnan Bashir,
Vladimir Berdnikov,
Daniele Binosi,
Lei Chang,
Chen Chen,
Muyang Chen,
João Pacheco B. C. de Melo,
Markus Diefenthaler,
Minghui Ding,
Rolf Ent,
Tobias Frederico,
Fei Gao,
Ralf W. Gothe,
Mohammad Hattawy,
Timothy J. Hobbs,
Tanja Horn,
Garth M. Huber,
Shaoyang Jia,
Cynthia Keppel
, et al. (26 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Understanding the origin and dynamics of hadron structure and in turn that of atomic nuclei is a central goal of nuclear physics. This challenge entails the questions of how does the roughly 1 GeV mass-scale that characterizes atomic nuclei appear; why does it have the observed value; and, enigmatically, why are the composite Nambu-Goldstone (NG) bosons in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) abnormally l…
▽ More
Understanding the origin and dynamics of hadron structure and in turn that of atomic nuclei is a central goal of nuclear physics. This challenge entails the questions of how does the roughly 1 GeV mass-scale that characterizes atomic nuclei appear; why does it have the observed value; and, enigmatically, why are the composite Nambu-Goldstone (NG) bosons in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) abnormally light in comparison? In this perspective, we provide an analysis of the mass budget of the pion and proton in QCD; discuss the special role of the kaon, which lies near the boundary between dominance of strong and Higgs mass-generation mechanisms; and explain the need for a coherent effort in QCD phenomenology and continuum calculations, in exa-scale computing as provided by lattice QCD, and in experiments to make progress in understanding the origins of hadron masses and the distribution of that mass within them. We compare the unique capabilities foreseen at the electron-ion collider (EIC) with those at the hadron-electron ring accelerator (HERA), the only previous electron-proton collider; and describe five key experimental measurements, enabled by the EIC and aimed at delivering fundamental insights that will generate concrete answers to the questions of how mass and structure arise in the pion and kaon, the Standard Model's NG modes, whose surprisingly low mass is critical to the evolution of our Universe.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2019; v1 submitted 18 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Weak charge form factor and radius of 208Pb through parity violation in electron scattering
Authors:
C. J. Horowitz,
Z. Ahmed,
C. -M. Jen,
A. Rakhman,
P. A. Souder,
M. M. Dalton,
N. Liyanage,
K. D. Paschke,
K. Saenboonruang,
R. Silwal,
G. B. Franklin,
M. Friend,
B. Quinn,
K. S. Kumar,
J. M. Mammei,
D. McNulty,
L. Mercado,
S. Riordan,
J. Wexler,
R. W. Michaels,
G. M. Urciuoli
Abstract:
We use distorted wave electron scattering calculations to extract the weak charge form factor F_W(q), the weak charge radius R_W, and the point neutron radius R_n, of 208Pb from the PREX parity violating asymmetry measurement. The form factor is the Fourier transform of the weak charge density at the average momentum transfer q=0.475 fm$^{-1}$. We find F_W(q) =0.204 \pm 0.028 (exp) \pm 0.001 (mode…
▽ More
We use distorted wave electron scattering calculations to extract the weak charge form factor F_W(q), the weak charge radius R_W, and the point neutron radius R_n, of 208Pb from the PREX parity violating asymmetry measurement. The form factor is the Fourier transform of the weak charge density at the average momentum transfer q=0.475 fm$^{-1}$. We find F_W(q) =0.204 \pm 0.028 (exp) \pm 0.001 (model). We use the Helm model to infer the weak radius from F_W(q). We find R_W= 5.826 \pm 0.181 (exp) \pm 0.027 (model) fm. Here the exp error includes PREX statistical and systematic errors, while the model error describes the uncertainty in R_W from uncertainties in the surface thickness σof the weak charge density. The weak radius is larger than the charge radius, implying a "weak charge skin" where the surface region is relatively enriched in weak charges compared to (electromagnetic) charges. We extract the point neutron radius R_n=5.751 \pm 0.175 (exp) \pm 0.026 (model) \pm 0.005 (strange) fm$, from R_W. Here there is only a very small error (strange) from possible strange quark contributions. We find R_n to be slightly smaller than R_W because of the nucleon's size. Finally, we find a neutron skin thickness of R_n-R_p=0.302\pm 0.175 (exp) \pm 0.026 (model) \pm 0.005 (strange) fm, where R_p is the point proton radius.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2014; v1 submitted 7 February, 2012;
originally announced February 2012.
