Electromagnetic moments of the antimony isotopes $^{112-133}$Sb
Authors:
S. Lechner,
T. Miyagi,
Z. Y. Xu,
M. L. Bissell,
K. Blaum,
B. Cheal,
C. S. Devlin,
R. F. Garcia Ruiz,
J. S. M. Ginges,
H. Heylen,
J. D. Holt,
P. Imgram,
A. Kanellakopoulos,
Á. Koszorús,
S. Malbrunot-Ettenauer,
R. Neugart,
G. Neyens,
W. Nörtershäuser,
P. Plattner,
L. V. Rodríguez,
G. Sanamyan,
S. R. Stroberg,
Y. Utsuno,
X. F. Yang,
D. T. Yordanov
Abstract:
Nuclear moments of the antimony isotopes $^{113-133}$Sb are measured by collinear laser spectroscopy and used to benchmark phenomenological shell-model and \textit{ab initio} calculations in the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG). The shell-model calculations reproduce the electromagnetic moments over all Sb isotopes when suitable effective $g$-factors and charges…
▽ More
Nuclear moments of the antimony isotopes $^{113-133}$Sb are measured by collinear laser spectroscopy and used to benchmark phenomenological shell-model and \textit{ab initio} calculations in the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG). The shell-model calculations reproduce the electromagnetic moments over all Sb isotopes when suitable effective $g$-factors and charges are employed. Good agreement is achieved by VS-IMSRG for magnetic moments on the neutron-deficient side for both odd-even and odd-odd Sb isotopes while its results deviate from experiment on the neutron-rich side. When the same effective $g$-factors are used, VS-IMSRG agrees with experiment nearly as well as the shell model. Hence, the wave functions are very similar in both approaches and missing contributions to the M1 operator are identified as the cause of the discrepancy of VS-IMSRG with experiment. Electric quadrupole moments remain more challenging for VS-IMSRG.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
Nuclear charge radius of $^{26m}$Al and its implication for V$_{ud}$ in the quark-mixing matrix
Authors:
P. Plattner,
E. Wood,
L. Al Ayoubi,
O. Beliuskina,
M. L. Bissell,
K. Blaum,
P. Campbell,
B. Cheal,
R. P. de Groote,
C. S. Devlin,
T. Eronen,
L. Filippin,
R. F. García Ruíz,
Z. Ge,
S. Geldhof,
W. Gins,
M. Godefroid,
H. Heylen,
M. Hukkanen,
P. Imgram,
A. Jaries,
A. Jokinen,
A. Kanellakopoulos,
A. Kankainen,
S. Kaufmann
, et al. (28 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Collinear laser spectroscopy was performed on the isomer of the aluminium isotope $^{26m}$Al. The measured isotope shift to $^{27}$Al in the $3s^{2}3p\;^{2}\!P^\circ_{3/2} \rightarrow 3s^{2}4s\;^{2}\!S_{1/2}$ atomic transition enabled the first experimental determination of the nuclear charge radius of $^{26m}$Al, resulting in $R_c$=\qty{3.130\pm.015}{\femto\meter}. This differs by 4.5 standard de…
▽ More
Collinear laser spectroscopy was performed on the isomer of the aluminium isotope $^{26m}$Al. The measured isotope shift to $^{27}$Al in the $3s^{2}3p\;^{2}\!P^\circ_{3/2} \rightarrow 3s^{2}4s\;^{2}\!S_{1/2}$ atomic transition enabled the first experimental determination of the nuclear charge radius of $^{26m}$Al, resulting in $R_c$=\qty{3.130\pm.015}{\femto\meter}. This differs by 4.5 standard deviations from the extrapolated value used to calculate the isospin-symmetry breaking corrections in the superallowed $β$ decay of $^{26m}$Al. Its corrected $\mathcal{F}t$ value, important for the estimation of $V_{ud}$ in the CKM matrix, is thus shifted by one standard deviation to \qty{3071.4\pm1.0}{\second}.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
