First Measurements of Spin-Dependent Double-Differential Cross Sections and the GDH Integrand from \vec{^3He}(\vecγ,n)pp at Incident Photon Energies of 12.8 and 14.7 MeV
Authors:
G. Laskaris,
Q. Ye,
B. Lalremruata,
Q. J. Ye,
M. W. Ahmed,
T. Averett,
A. Deltuva,
D. Dutta,
A. C. Fonseca,
H. Gao,
J. Golak,
M. Huang,
H. J. Karwowski,
J. M. Mueller,
L. S. Myers,
C. Peng,
B. A. Perdue,
X. Qian,
P. U. Sauer,
R. Skibiński,
S. Stave J. R. Tompkins,
H. R. Weller,
H. Witała,
Y. K. Wu,
Y. Zhang
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The first measurement of the three-body photodisintegration of longitudinally-polarized ^3He with a circularly-polarized γ-ray beam was carried out at the High Intensity γ-ray Source (HIγS) facility located at Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL). The spin-dependent double-differential cross sections and the contributions from the three-body photodisintegration to the ^3He GDH integrand…
▽ More
The first measurement of the three-body photodisintegration of longitudinally-polarized ^3He with a circularly-polarized γ-ray beam was carried out at the High Intensity γ-ray Source (HIγS) facility located at Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL). The spin-dependent double-differential cross sections and the contributions from the three-body photodisintegration to the ^3He GDH integrand are presented and compared with state-of-the-art three-body calculations at the incident photon energies of 12.8 and 14.7 MeV. The data reveal the importance of including the Coulomb interaction between protons in three-body calculations.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
In Beam Tests of Implanted Helium Targets
Authors:
J. E. McDonald,
R. H. France III,
R. A. Jarvis,
M. W. Ahmed,
M. A. Blackston,
Th. Delbar,
M. Gai,
T. J. Kading,
Y. Parpottas,
B. A. Perdue,
R. M. Prior,
D. A. Rubin,
M. C. Spraker,
J. D. Yeomans,
L. Weissman,
H. R. Weller,
E. L. Wilds Jr,
;,
UHartford,
GCSU,
LNS/UConn,
TUNL/Duke,
UCL/LLN,
Yale,
NGCSU
Abstract:
Targets consisting of 3,4He implanted into thin aluminum foils (approximately 100, 200 or 600 ug/cm^2) were prepared using intense (a few uA) helium beams at low energy (approximately 20, 40 or 100 keV). Uniformity of the implantation was achieved by a beam raster across a 12 mm diameter tantalum collimator at the rates of 0.1 Hz in the vertical direction and 1 Hz in the horizontal direction. He…
▽ More
Targets consisting of 3,4He implanted into thin aluminum foils (approximately 100, 200 or 600 ug/cm^2) were prepared using intense (a few uA) helium beams at low energy (approximately 20, 40 or 100 keV). Uniformity of the implantation was achieved by a beam raster across a 12 mm diameter tantalum collimator at the rates of 0.1 Hz in the vertical direction and 1 Hz in the horizontal direction. Helium implantation into the very thin (approximately 80-100 ug/cm^2) aluminum foils failed to produce useful targets (with only approximately 10% of the helium retained) due to an under estimation of the range by the code SRIM. The range of low energy helium in aluminum predicted by Northcliffe and Shilling and the NIST online tabulation are observed on the other hand to over estimate the range of low energy helium ions in aluminum. An attempt to increase the amount of helium by implanting a second deeper layer was also carried out, but it did not significantly increase the helium content beyond the blistering limit (approximately 6 x 10^17 helium/cm^2). The implanted targets were bombarded with moderately intense 4He and 16O beams of 50-100 particle nA . Rutherford Back Scattering of 1.0 and 2.5 MeV proton beams and recoil helium from 15.0 MeV oxygen beams were used to study the helium content and profile before, during and after bombardments. We observed the helium content and profile to be very stable even after a prolonged bombardment (up to two days) with moderately intense beams of 16O or 4He. Helium implanted into thin (aluminum) foils is a good choice for thin helium targets needed, for example, for a measurement of the 3he(a,g)7Be reaction and the associated S34 astrophysical cross section factor (S-factor).
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2006;
originally announced August 2006.
