High-precision Penning trap mass measurements of neutron-rich chlorine isotopes at the N=28 shell closure
Authors:
H. Erington,
G. Bollen,
G. Dykstra,
A. Hamaker,
C. M. Ireland,
C. R. Nicoloff,
D. Puentes,
R. Ringle,
S. Schwarz,
C. S. Sumithrarachchi,
A. A. Valverde,
I. T. Yandow
Abstract:
Although it is known that the $N=28$ spherical shell closure erodes, the strength of the closure with decreasing proton number $Z<20$ is an open question in nuclear structure. In this region of interest, direct high-precision mass measurements of neutron-rich $^{43-45}$Cl isotopes were performed at the Low Energy Beam and Ion Trap (LEBIT) when coupled to the National Superconducting Cyclotron Lab.…
▽ More
Although it is known that the $N=28$ spherical shell closure erodes, the strength of the closure with decreasing proton number $Z<20$ is an open question in nuclear structure. In this region of interest, direct high-precision mass measurements of neutron-rich $^{43-45}$Cl isotopes were performed at the Low Energy Beam and Ion Trap (LEBIT) when coupled to the National Superconducting Cyclotron Lab. The resulting mass excesses (MEs) are ME($^{43}$Cl) = -24114.4(1.7) keV, ME($^{44}$Cl) = -20450.8(10.6) keV, and ME($^{45}$Cl) = -18240.1(3.7) keV, and improve the uncertainty of these masses by up to a factor of ~40 compared to the previous values reported in the 2020 Atomic Mass Evaluation. Comparison to $\textit{ab initio}$ calculations using the Valence-Space In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group (VS-IMSRG) shows good agreement up to and including the closure.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
Mass Measurement of $^{27}$P to Constrain Type-I X-ray Burst Models and Validate the IMME for the A=27, T=$\frac{3}{2}$ Isospin Quartet
Authors:
I. T. Yandow,
A. Abdullah-Smoot,
G. Bollen,
A. Hamaker,
C. R. Nicoloff,
D. Puentes,
M. Redshaw,
K. Gulyuz,
Z. Meisel,
W. -J. Ong,
R. Ringle,
R. Sandler,
S. Schwarz,
C. S. Sumithrarachchi,
A. A. Valverde
Abstract:
Light curves are the primary observable of type-I x-ray bursts. Computational x-ray burst models must match simulations to observed light curves. Most of the error in simulated curves comes from uncertainties in $rp$ process reaction rates, which can be reduced via precision mass measurements of neutron-deficient isotopes in the $rp$ process path.
We perform a precise Penning trap mass measureme…
▽ More
Light curves are the primary observable of type-I x-ray bursts. Computational x-ray burst models must match simulations to observed light curves. Most of the error in simulated curves comes from uncertainties in $rp$ process reaction rates, which can be reduced via precision mass measurements of neutron-deficient isotopes in the $rp$ process path.
We perform a precise Penning trap mass measurement of $^{27}$P utilizing the ToF-ICR technique. We use this measurement to calculate $rp$ process reaction rates and input these rates into an x-ray burst model to reduce simulated light curve uncertainty. We also use the mass measurement of $^{27}$P to validate the Isobaric Multiplet Mass Equation (IMME) for the A=27 T=$\frac{3}{2}$ isospin quartet which $^{27}$P belongs to.
The mass excess of $^{27}$P was measured to be -670.7(6) keV, a fourteen-fold precision increase over the mass reported in the 2020 Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME2020). X-ray burst light curves were produced with the MESA (Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) code using the new mass and associated reaction rates. Changes in the mass of $^{27}$P seem to have minimal effect on light curves, even in burster systems tailored to maximize impact.
The mass of $^{27}$P does not play a significant role in x-ray burst light curves. It is important to understand that more advanced models do not just provide more precise results, but often qualitatively different ones. This result brings us a step closer to extracting stellar parameters from individual x-ray burst observations. The IMME has been validated for the $A=27, T=3/2$ quartet. The normal quadratic form of the IMME using the latest data yields a reduced $χ^2$ of 2.9. The cubic term required to generate an exact fit to the latest data matches theoretical attempts to predict this term.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 16 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
