Probing the quantum phase transition around $N\approx60$ via mass measurements of technetium isotopes
Authors:
J. Ruotsalainen,
A. Jaries,
M. Stryjczyk,
A. Kankainen,
B. Andel,
M. Araszkiewicz,
O. Beliuskina,
A. Bruce,
S. Cannarozzo,
S. Chinthakayala,
S. Doshi,
T. Eronen,
A. Fijałkowska,
L. M. Fraile,
P. Garczyński,
Z. Ge,
D. Grigorova,
G. Jaworski,
A. Korgul,
T. Krakowski,
J. Kurpeta,
S. Lalkovski,
M. Llanos Expósito,
I. D. Moore,
L. M. Motilla
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The masses of neutron-rich $^{104-106}$Tc isotopes were measured using the JYFLTRAP double Penning trap and found to deviate from the Atomic Mass Evaluation 2020 by $-79(25)$, $40(12)$ and $94(41)$ keV, respectively. In the case of $^{105,106}$Tc, the updated $Q_β$ values are in agreement with a previous JYFLTRAP measurement, disagreeing with the values from the mass evaluation. The new mass value…
▽ More
The masses of neutron-rich $^{104-106}$Tc isotopes were measured using the JYFLTRAP double Penning trap and found to deviate from the Atomic Mass Evaluation 2020 by $-79(25)$, $40(12)$ and $94(41)$ keV, respectively. In the case of $^{105,106}$Tc, the updated $Q_β$ values are in agreement with a previous JYFLTRAP measurement, disagreeing with the values from the mass evaluation. The new mass values result in a more linear trend in two-neutron separation energies indicating that technetium ($Z=43$) isotopes around $N \approx 60$ are not a part of the island of shape coexistence around $^{100}$Zr$_{60}$.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
