-
Deep inelastic scattering as a probe of entanglement
Authors:
Dmitri E. Kharzeev,
Eugene M. Levin
Abstract:
Using non-linear evolution equations of QCD, we compute the von Neumann entropy of the system of partons resolved by deep inelastic scattering at a given Bjorken $x$ and momentum transfer $q^2 = - Q^2$. We interpret the result as the entropy of entanglement between the spatial region probed by deep inelastic scattering and the rest of the proton. At small $x$ the relation between the entanglement…
▽ More
Using non-linear evolution equations of QCD, we compute the von Neumann entropy of the system of partons resolved by deep inelastic scattering at a given Bjorken $x$ and momentum transfer $q^2 = - Q^2$. We interpret the result as the entropy of entanglement between the spatial region probed by deep inelastic scattering and the rest of the proton. At small $x$ the relation between the entanglement entropy $S(x)$ and the parton distribution $xG(x)$ becomes very simple: $S(x) = \ln[ xG(x) ]$. In this small $x$, large rapidity $Y$ regime, all partonic micro-states have equal probabilities -- the proton is composed by an exponentially large number $\exp(ΔY)$ of micro-states that occur with equal and exponentially small probabilities $\exp(-ΔY)$, where $Δ$ is defined by $xG(x) \sim 1/x^Δ$. For this equipartitioned state, the entanglement entropy is maximal -- so at small $x$, deep inelastic scattering probes a {\it maximally entangled state}. We propose the entanglement entropy as an observable that can be studied in deep inelastic scattering. This will require event-by-event measurements of hadronic final states, and would allow to study the transformation of entanglement entropy into the Boltzmann one. We estimate that the proton is represented by the maximally entangled state at $x \leq 10^{-3}$; this kinematic region will be amenable to studies at the Electron Ion Collider.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2017; v1 submitted 12 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all
Authors:
A. Accardi,
J. L. Albacete,
M. Anselmino,
N. Armesto,
E. C. Aschenauer,
A. Bacchetta,
D. Boer,
W. K. Brooks,
T. Burton,
N. -B. Chang,
W. -T. Deng,
A. Deshpande,
M. Diehl,
A. Dumitru,
R. Dupré,
R. Ent,
S. Fazio,
H. Gao,
V. Guzey,
H. Hakobyan,
Y. Hao,
D. Hasch,
R. Holt,
T. Horn,
M. Huang
, et al. (53 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This White Paper presents the science case of an Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), focused on the structure and interactions of gluon-dominated matter, with the intent to articulate it to the broader nuclear science community. It was commissioned by the managements of Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) with the objective of presenting a summar…
▽ More
This White Paper presents the science case of an Electron-Ion Collider (EIC), focused on the structure and interactions of gluon-dominated matter, with the intent to articulate it to the broader nuclear science community. It was commissioned by the managements of Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab) with the objective of presenting a summary of scientific opportunities and goals of the EIC as a follow-up to the 2007 NSAC Long Range plan. This document is a culmination of a community-wide effort in nuclear science following a series of workshops on EIC physics and, in particular, the focused ten-week program on "Gluons and quark sea at high energies" at the Institute for Nuclear Theory in Fall 2010. It contains a brief description of a few golden physics measurements along with accelerator and detector concepts required to achieve them, and it benefited from inputs from the users' communities of BNL and JLab. This White Paper offers the promise to propel the QCD science program in the U.S., established with the CEBAF accelerator at JLab and the RHIC collider at BNL, to the next QCD frontier.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2014; v1 submitted 7 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
-
Nuclear modification of the J/Psi transverse momentum distributions in high energy pA and AA collisions
Authors:
D. E. Kharzeev,
E. M. Levin,
K. Tuchin
Abstract:
We evaluate the transverse momentum spectrum of J/Psi (up to semi-hard momenta) in pA and AA collisions taking into account only the initial state effects, but resumming them to all orders in α_s^2 A^{1/3}. In our previous papers we noticed that cold nuclear matter effects alone could not explain the experimental data on rapidity and centrality dependencies of the J/Psi yield in AA collisions indi…
▽ More
We evaluate the transverse momentum spectrum of J/Psi (up to semi-hard momenta) in pA and AA collisions taking into account only the initial state effects, but resumming them to all orders in α_s^2 A^{1/3}. In our previous papers we noticed that cold nuclear matter effects alone could not explain the experimental data on rapidity and centrality dependencies of the J/Psi yield in AA collisions indicating the existence of an additional suppression mechanism. Our present calculations indicate that the discrepancy persists and even increases at semi-hard transverse momenta, implying a significant final state effect on J/Psi production in this kinematical domain. The QCD dipole model we employ is only marginally applicable for J/Psi production at mid-rapidity at RHIC energies but its use is justified in the forward rapidity region. At LHC energies we can quantitatively evaluate the magnitude of cold nuclear matter effects in the entire kinematical region of interest. We present our calculations of J/Psi transverse momentum spectra in pA and AA collisions at LHC and RHIC energies.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2014; v1 submitted 7 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
-
Gluon saturation in $pA$ collisions at the LHC: KLN model predictions for hadron multiplicities
Authors:
Adrian Dumitru,
Dmitri E. Kharzeev,
Eugene M. Levin,
Yasushi Nara
Abstract:
The upcoming p+Pb run at the LHC will probe the nuclear gluon distribution at very small Bjorken x (from $x \sim 10^{-4}$ at mid-rapidity down to $x \sim 10^{-6}$ in the proton fragmentation region) and will allow to test approaches based on parton saturation. Here, we present the predictions of the KLN model for hadron multiplicities and multiplicity distributions in p+Pb collisions at a center-o…
▽ More
The upcoming p+Pb run at the LHC will probe the nuclear gluon distribution at very small Bjorken x (from $x \sim 10^{-4}$ at mid-rapidity down to $x \sim 10^{-6}$ in the proton fragmentation region) and will allow to test approaches based on parton saturation. Here, we present the predictions of the KLN model for hadron multiplicities and multiplicity distributions in p+Pb collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 4.4 TeV. We also compare the model to the existing pp, dA and AA data from RHIC and LHC.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2012; v1 submitted 13 November, 2011;
originally announced November 2011.
-
Gluon saturation effects on the color singlet J/Psi production in high energy dA and AA collisions
Authors:
F. Dominguez,
D. E. Kharzeev,
E. M. Levin,
A. H. Mueller,
K. Tuchin
Abstract:
We derive the formulae for the cross section of J/Psi production in high energy pA and AA collisions taking into account the gluon saturation/color glass condensate effects. We then perform the numerical calculations of the corresponding nuclear modification factors and find a good agreement between our calculations and the experimental data on J/Psi production in dA collisions. We also observe th…
▽ More
We derive the formulae for the cross section of J/Psi production in high energy pA and AA collisions taking into account the gluon saturation/color glass condensate effects. We then perform the numerical calculations of the corresponding nuclear modification factors and find a good agreement between our calculations and the experimental data on J/Psi production in dA collisions. We also observe that cold nuclear modification effects alone cannot describe the data on J/Psi production in AA collisions. Additional final state suppression (at RHIC) and enhancement (at LHC) mechanisms are required to explain the experimental observations.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
