-
Splitting of ISGMR strength in the light-mass nucleus $^{24}$Mg due to ground-state deformation
Authors:
Y. K. Gupta,
U. Garg,
J. T. Matta,
D. Patel,
T. Peach,
J. Hoffman,
K. Yoshida,
M. Itoh,
M. Fujiwara,
K. Hara,
H. Hashimoto,
K. Nakanishi,
M. Yosoi,
H. Sakaguchi,
S. Terashima,
S. Kishi,
T. Murakami,
M. Uchida,
Y. Yasuda,
H. Akimune,
T. Kawabata,
M. N. Harakeh
Abstract:
The isoscalar giant monopole resonance (ISGMR) strength distribution in $^{24}$Mg has been determined from background-free inelastic scattering of 386-MeV $α$ particles at extreme forward angles, including 0$^{\circ}$. The ISGMR strength distribution has been observed for the first time to have a two-peak structure in a light-mass nucleus. This splitting of ISGMR strength is explained well by micr…
▽ More
The isoscalar giant monopole resonance (ISGMR) strength distribution in $^{24}$Mg has been determined from background-free inelastic scattering of 386-MeV $α$ particles at extreme forward angles, including 0$^{\circ}$. The ISGMR strength distribution has been observed for the first time to have a two-peak structure in a light-mass nucleus. This splitting of ISGMR strength is explained well by microscopic theory in terms of the prolate deformation of the ground state of $^{24}$Mg.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
-
Isoscalar Giant Resonance Strengths in $^{32}$S and possible excitations of superdeformed and $^{28}$Si + $α$ cluster bandheads
Authors:
M. Itoh,
S. Kishi,
H. Sakaguchi,
H. Akimune,
M. Fujiwara,
U. Garg,
K. Hara,
H. Hashimoto,
J. Hoffman,
T. Kawabata,
K. Kawase,
T. Murakami,
K. Nakanishi,
B. K. Nayak,
S. Terashima,
M. Uchida,
Y. Yasuda,
M. Yosoi
Abstract:
Isoscalar giant resonances and low spin states in $^{32}$S have been measured with inelastic $α$ scattering at extremely forward angles including zero degrees at E$_α$ = 386 MeV. By applying the multipole decomposition analysis, various excited states are classified according to their spin and parities (J$^π$), and are discussed in relation to the super deformed and $^{28}$Si + $α$ cluster bands.
Isoscalar giant resonances and low spin states in $^{32}$S have been measured with inelastic $α$ scattering at extremely forward angles including zero degrees at E$_α$ = 386 MeV. By applying the multipole decomposition analysis, various excited states are classified according to their spin and parities (J$^π$), and are discussed in relation to the super deformed and $^{28}$Si + $α$ cluster bands.
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
-
Proton decay from the isoscalar giant dipole resonance in $^{58}$Ni
Authors:
M. Hunyadi,
H. Hashimoto,
T. Li,
H. Akimune,
H. Fujimura,
M. Fujiwara,
Z. Gacsi,
U. Garg,
K. Hara,
M. N. Harakeh,
J. Hoffman,
M. Itoh,
T. Murakami,
K. Nakanishi,
B. K. Nayak,
S. Okumura,
H. Sakaguchi,
S. Terashima,
M. Uchida,
Y. Yasuda,
M. Yosoi
Abstract:
Proton decay from the 3$\hbarω$ isoscalar giant dipole resonance (ISGDR) in $^{58}$Ni has been measured using the ($α,α'p$) reaction at a bombarding energy of 386 MeV to investigate its decay properties. We have extracted the ISGDR strength under the coincidence condition between inelastically scattered $α$ particles at forward angles and decay protons emitted at backward angles. Branching ratio…
▽ More
Proton decay from the 3$\hbarω$ isoscalar giant dipole resonance (ISGDR) in $^{58}$Ni has been measured using the ($α,α'p$) reaction at a bombarding energy of 386 MeV to investigate its decay properties. We have extracted the ISGDR strength under the coincidence condition between inelastically scattered $α$ particles at forward angles and decay protons emitted at backward angles. Branching ratios for proton decay to low-lying states of $^{57}$Co have been determined, and the results compared to predictions of recent continuum-RPA calculations. The final-state spectra of protons decaying to the low-lying states in $^{57}$Co were analyzed for a more detailed understanding of the structure of the ISGDR. It is found that there are differences in the structure of the ISGDR as a function of excitation energy.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2009; v1 submitted 23 June, 2009;
originally announced June 2009.