-
The Ion Fluorescence Chamber (IFC): A new concept for directional dark matter and topologically imaging neutrinoless double beta decay searches
Authors:
B. J. P. Jones,
F. W. Foss,
J. A. Asaadi,
E. D. Church,
J. deLeon,
E. Gramellini,
O. H. Seidel,
T. T. Vuong
Abstract:
We introduce a novel particle detection concept for large-volume, fine granularity particle detection: The Ion Fluorescence Chamber (IFC). In electronegative gases such as SF$_6$ and SeF$_6$, ionizing particles create ensembles of positive and negative ions. In the IFC, positive ions are drifted to a chemically active cathode where they react with a custom organic turn-on fluorescent monolayer enc…
▽ More
We introduce a novel particle detection concept for large-volume, fine granularity particle detection: The Ion Fluorescence Chamber (IFC). In electronegative gases such as SF$_6$ and SeF$_6$, ionizing particles create ensembles of positive and negative ions. In the IFC, positive ions are drifted to a chemically active cathode where they react with a custom organic turn-on fluorescent monolayer encoding a long-lived 2D image. The negative ions are sensed electrically with course resolution at the anode, inducing an optical microscope to travel to and scan the corresponding cathode location for the fluorescent image. This concept builds on technologies developed for barium tagging in neutrinoless double beta decay, combining the ultra-fine imaging capabilities of an emulsion detector with the monolithic sensing of a time projection chamber. The result is a high precision imaging detector over arbitrarily large volumes without the challenges of ballooning channel count or system complexity. After outlining the concept, we discuss R\&D to be undertaken to demonstrate it, and explore application to both directional dark matter searches in SF$_6$ and searches for neutrinoless double beta decay in large $^{82}$SeF$_6$ chambers.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
First Measurement of Monoenergetic Muon Neutrino Charged Current Interactions
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. L. Cooper,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. S. Fitzpatrick,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
J. R. Jordan,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
K. Mahn
, et al. (24 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report the first measurement of monoenergetic muon neutrino charged current interactions. MiniBooNE has isolated 236 MeV muon neutrino events originating from charged kaon decay at rest ($K^+ \rightarrow μ^+ ν_μ$) at the NuMI beamline absorber. These signal $ν_μ$-carbon events are distinguished from primarily pion decay in flight $ν_μ$ and $\overlineν_μ$ backgrounds produced at the target stati…
▽ More
We report the first measurement of monoenergetic muon neutrino charged current interactions. MiniBooNE has isolated 236 MeV muon neutrino events originating from charged kaon decay at rest ($K^+ \rightarrow μ^+ ν_μ$) at the NuMI beamline absorber. These signal $ν_μ$-carbon events are distinguished from primarily pion decay in flight $ν_μ$ and $\overlineν_μ$ backgrounds produced at the target station and decay pipe using their arrival time and reconstructed muon energy. The significance of the signal observation is at the 3.9$σ$ level. The muon kinetic energy, neutrino-nucleus energy transfer ($ω=E_ν-E_μ$), and total cross section for these events is extracted. This result is the first known-energy, weak-interaction-only probe of the nucleus to yield a measurement of $ω$ using neutrinos, a quantity thus far only accessible through electron scattering.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2018; v1 submitted 11 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report
Authors:
Jim Alexander,
Marco Battaglieri,
Bertrand Echenard,
Rouven Essig,
Matthew Graham,
Eder Izaguirre,
John Jaros,
Gordan Krnjaic,
Jeremy Mardon,
David Morrissey,
Tim Nelson,
Maxim Perelstein,
Matt Pyle,
Adam Ritz,
Philip Schuster,
Brian Shuve,
Natalia Toro,
Richard G Van De Water,
Daniel Akerib,
Haipeng An,
Konrad Aniol,
Isaac J. Arnquist,
David M. Asner,
Henning O. Back,
Keith Baker
, et al. (179 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This report, based on the Dark Sectors workshop at SLAC in April 2016, summarizes the scientific importance of searches for dark sector dark matter and forces at masses beneath the weak-scale, the status of this broad international field, the important milestones motivating future exploration, and promising experimental opportunities to reach these milestones over the next 5-10 years.
This report, based on the Dark Sectors workshop at SLAC in April 2016, summarizes the scientific importance of searches for dark sector dark matter and forces at masses beneath the weak-scale, the status of this broad international field, the important milestones motivating future exploration, and promising experimental opportunities to reach these milestones over the next 5-10 years.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
-
The Intermediate Neutrino Program
Authors:
C. Adams,
J. R. Alonso,
A. M. Ankowski,
J. A. Asaadi,
J. Ashenfelter,
S. N. Axani,
K. Babu,
C. Backhouse,
H. R. Band,
P. S. Barbeau,
N. Barros,
A. Bernstein,
M. Betancourt,
M. Bishai,
E. Blucher,
J. Bouffard,
N. Bowden,
S. Brice,
C. Bryan,
L. Camilleri,
J. Cao,
J. Carlson,
R. E. Carr,
A. Chatterjee,
M. Chen
, et al. (164 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The US neutrino community gathered at the Workshop on the Intermediate Neutrino Program (WINP) at Brookhaven National Laboratory February 4-6, 2015 to explore opportunities in neutrino physics over the next five to ten years. Scientists from particle, astroparticle and nuclear physics participated in the workshop. The workshop examined promising opportunities for neutrino physics in the intermedia…
▽ More
The US neutrino community gathered at the Workshop on the Intermediate Neutrino Program (WINP) at Brookhaven National Laboratory February 4-6, 2015 to explore opportunities in neutrino physics over the next five to ten years. Scientists from particle, astroparticle and nuclear physics participated in the workshop. The workshop examined promising opportunities for neutrino physics in the intermediate term, including possible new small to mid-scale experiments, US contributions to large experiments, upgrades to existing experiments, R&D plans and theory. The workshop was organized into two sets of parallel working group sessions, divided by physics topics and technology. Physics working groups covered topics on Sterile Neutrinos, Neutrino Mixing, Neutrino Interactions, Neutrino Properties and Astrophysical Neutrinos. Technology sessions were organized into Theory, Short-Baseline Accelerator Neutrinos, Reactor Neutrinos, Detector R&D and Source, Cyclotron and Meson Decay at Rest sessions.This report summarizes discussion and conclusions from the workshop.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2015; v1 submitted 23 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Using L/E Oscillation Probability Distributions
Authors:
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills,
J. Mirabal
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper explores the use of $L/E$ oscillation probability distributions to compare experimental measurements and to evaluate oscillation models. In this case, $L$ is the distance of neutrino travel and $E$ is a measure of the interacting neutrino's energy. While comparisons using allowed and excluded regions for oscillation model parameters are likely the only rigorous method for these comparis…
▽ More
This paper explores the use of $L/E$ oscillation probability distributions to compare experimental measurements and to evaluate oscillation models. In this case, $L$ is the distance of neutrino travel and $E$ is a measure of the interacting neutrino's energy. While comparisons using allowed and excluded regions for oscillation model parameters are likely the only rigorous method for these comparisons, the $L/E$ distributions are shown to give qualitative information on the agreement of an experiment's data with a simple two-neutrino oscillation model. In more detail, this paper also outlines how the $L/E$ distributions can be best calculated and used for model comparisons. Specifically, the paper presents the $L/E$ data points for the final MiniBooNE data samples and, in the Appendix, explains and corrects the mistaken analysis published by the ICARUS collaboration.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
Improved Search for $\bar ν_μ\rightarrow \bar ν_e$ Oscillations in the MiniBooNE Experiment
Authors:
The MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over the previously reported results. An event excess of $78.4 \pm 28.5$ events ($2.8 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscilla…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode, an increase of approximately a factor of two over the previously reported results. An event excess of $78.4 \pm 28.5$ events ($2.8 σ$) is observed in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. If interpreted in a two-neutrino oscillation model, $\barν_μ\rightarrow\barν_e$, the best oscillation fit to the excess has a probability of 66% while the background-only fit has a $χ^2$-probability of 0.5% relative to the best fit. The data are consistent with antineutrino oscillations in the $0.01 < Δm^2 < 1.0$ eV$^2$ range and have some overlap with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND). All of the major backgrounds are constrained by in-situ event measurements so non-oscillation explanations would need to invoke new anomalous background processes. The neutrino mode running also shows an excess at low energy of $162.0 \pm 47.8$ events ($3.4 σ$) but the energy distribution of the excess is marginally compatible with a simple two neutrino oscillation formalism. Expanded models with several sterile neutrinos can reduce the incompatibility by allowing for CP violating effects between neutrino and antineutrino oscillations.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2013; v1 submitted 11 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
A Combined $ν_μ\to ν_e$ and $\barν_μ\to \barν_e$ Oscillation Analysis of the MiniBooNE Excesses
Authors:
MiniBooNE Collaboration,
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo,
B. C. Brown,
L. Bugel,
G. Cheng,
E. D. Church,
J. M. Conrad,
R. Dharmapalan,
Z. Djurcic,
D. A. Finley,
R. Ford,
F. G. Garcia,
G. T. Garvey,
J. Grange,
W. Huelsnitz,
C. Ignarra,
R. Imlay,
R. A. Johnson,
G. Karagiorgi,
T. Katori,
T. Kobilarcik,
W. C. Louis,
C. Mariani,
W. Marsh,
G. B. Mills
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of the combined $ν_e$ and $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $6.46 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode. A total excess of $240.3 \pm 34.5 \pm 52.6$ events ($3.8 σ$) is observed from combining the two data sets in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ Me…
▽ More
The MiniBooNE experiment at Fermilab reports results from an analysis of the combined $ν_e$ and $\bar ν_e$ appearance data from $6.46 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in neutrino mode and $11.27 \times 10^{20}$ protons on target in antineutrino mode. A total excess of $240.3 \pm 34.5 \pm 52.6$ events ($3.8 σ$) is observed from combining the two data sets in the energy range $200<E_ν^{QE}<1250$ MeV. In a combined fit for CP-conserving $ν_μ\rightarrow ν_e$ and $\barν_μ\rightarrow\barν_e$ oscillations via a two-neutrino model, the background-only fit has a $χ^2$-probability of 0.03% relative to the best oscillation fit. The data are consistent with neutrino oscillations in the $0.01 < Δm^2 < 1.0$ eV$^2$ range and with the evidence for antineutrino oscillations from the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND).
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2012; v1 submitted 19 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Evidence for nu_mu -> nu_e Neutrino Oscillations from LSND
Authors:
LSND Collaboration,
C. Athanassopoulos,
L. B. Auerbach,
R. L. Burman,
D. O. Caldwell,
E. D. Church,
I. Cohen,
J. B. Donahue,
A. Fazely,
F. J. Federspiel,
G. T. Garvey,
R. M. Gunasingha,
R. Imlay,
K. Johnston,
H. J. Kim,
W. C. Louis,
R. Majkic,
K. McIlhany,
W. Metcalf,
G. B. Mills,
R. A. Reeder,
V. Sandberg,
D. Smith,
I. Stancu,
W. Strossman
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A search for nu_mu -> nu_e oscillations has been conducted with the LSND apparatus at the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility. Using nu_mu from pi^+ decay in flight, the nu_e appearance is detected via the charged-current reaction C(nu_e,e^-)X. Two independent analyses observe a total of 40 beam-on high-energy electron events (60 < E_e < 200 MeV) consistent with the above signature. This number is…
▽ More
A search for nu_mu -> nu_e oscillations has been conducted with the LSND apparatus at the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility. Using nu_mu from pi^+ decay in flight, the nu_e appearance is detected via the charged-current reaction C(nu_e,e^-)X. Two independent analyses observe a total of 40 beam-on high-energy electron events (60 < E_e < 200 MeV) consistent with the above signature. This number is significantly above the 21.9 +- 2.1 events expected from the nu_e contamination in the beam and the beam-off background. If interpreted as an oscillation signal, the observed oscillation probability of (2.6 +- 1.0 +- 0.5) x 10^{-3} is consistent with the previously reported nu_mu_bar -> nu_e_bar oscillation evidence from LSND.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 1997;
originally announced September 1997.
-
Evidence for nu_mu -> nu_e Oscillations from Pion Decay in Flight Neutrinos
Authors:
LSND Collaboration,
C. Athanassopoulos,
L. B. Auerbach,
R. L. Burman,
D. O. Caldwell,
E. D. Church,
I. Cohen,
B. D. Dieterle,
J. B. Donahue,
A. Fazely,
F. J. Federspiel,
G. T. Garvey,
R. M. Gunasingha,
R. Imlay,
K. Johnston,
H. J. Kim,
W. C. Louis,
R. Majkic,
J. Margulies,
K. McIlhany,
W. Metcalf,
G. B. Mills,
R. A. Reeder,
V. Sandberg,
D. Smith
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A search for nu_mu -> nu_e oscillations has been conducted at the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility using nu_mu from pi^+ decay in flight. An excess in the number of beam-related events from the C(nu_e,e^-)X inclusive reaction is observed. The excess is too large to be explained by normal nu_e contamination in the beam at a confidence level greater than 99%. If interpreted as an oscillation sign…
▽ More
A search for nu_mu -> nu_e oscillations has been conducted at the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility using nu_mu from pi^+ decay in flight. An excess in the number of beam-related events from the C(nu_e,e^-)X inclusive reaction is observed. The excess is too large to be explained by normal nu_e contamination in the beam at a confidence level greater than 99%. If interpreted as an oscillation signal, the observed oscillation probability of (2.6 +- 1.0 +- 0.5) x 10^{-3} is consistent with the previously reported nu_mu_bar -> nu_e_bar oscillation evidence from LSND.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 1997;
originally announced June 1997.
