Event-by-event multiplicity fluctuations and correlations in ring-like and jet like events in $^{197}$Au-AgBr collisions at 11.6A GeV/c
Authors:
Bushra Ali,
Sweta Singh,
Anuj Chandra,
Shakeel Ahmad
Abstract:
Event-by-event (ebe) multiplicity \fll and \cor amongst the charged particles emitted in the forward-backward symmetric pseudorapidity (\et) windows of varying widths and positions are investigated by analyzing the experimental data on $^{197}$Au-AgBr collisions at 11.6A GeV/c. The findings are compared with the predictions of relativistic transport model, \urq and independent particle emission (o…
▽ More
Event-by-event (ebe) multiplicity \fll and \cor amongst the charged particles emitted in the forward-backward symmetric pseudorapidity (\et) windows of varying widths and positions are investigated by analyzing the experimental data on $^{197}$Au-AgBr collisions at 11.6A GeV/c. The findings are compared with the predictions of relativistic transport model, \urq and independent particle emission (or mixed event) model. It is observed that the \fll in ebe mean pseudorapidity values and those reflected from the \fll strength measure, \(Φ\) are relatively higher as compared to those expected from the statistically independent particle emission model. The study of the variance, \(σ_c^2\) of a suitably defined forward-backward asymmetry variable \(C\) as a function of \et window width and position indicates the presence of strong short-range correlations, which might arise due to isotropic decay of cluster-like objects either in forward or backward \et region. Furthermore, analyses of events having \ring and \jet substructures, carried out separately, suggest that the major contribution to the observed \fll in the data sample are due to ring-like events, while the contributions from the \jet events appear to be rather small. The observed difference in the behavior of correlation strengths from the two types of events might be due to the enhanced emission of Cherenkov gluons, giving rise to the \ring substructure. The mixed event analysis further confirms that the observed \fll are the distinct feature of the data, which disappear after event mixing.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2023; v1 submitted 3 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
Event by Event Analysis of High Multiplicity Events Produced in 158 A GeV/c 208 Pb- 208 Pb Collisions
Authors:
Shakeel Ahmad,
Anuj Chandra,
Ashwini Kumar,
O. S. K. Chaturvedi,
A. Ahmad,
M. Zafar,
M. Irfan,
B. K. Singh
Abstract:
An extensive analysis of individual high multiplicity events produced in 158 A GeV /c 208Pb- 208Pb collisions is carried by adopting different methods to examine the anomalous behavior of these rare events. A method of selecting the events with densely populated narrow regions or spikes out of a given sample of collision events is discussed.Employing this approach two events with large spikes in t…
▽ More
An extensive analysis of individual high multiplicity events produced in 158 A GeV /c 208Pb- 208Pb collisions is carried by adopting different methods to examine the anomalous behavior of these rare events. A method of selecting the events with densely populated narrow regions or spikes out of a given sample of collision events is discussed.Employing this approach two events with large spikes in their eta- and phi- distributions are selected for further analysis. For the sake of comparison, another two events which do not exhibit such spikes are simultaneously analyzed. The findings suggest that the systematic studies of particle density fluctuations in one- and two-dimensional phase-spaces and comparison with those obtained from the studies of correlation free Monte Carlo events, would be useful for identifying the events with large dynamical fluctuations. Formation of clusters or jet like phenomena in multihadronic final states in individual events is also discussed and the experimental findings are compared with the independent particle emission hypothesis by carrying out Monte Carlo simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
