BATTPOWER Application: Large-Scale Integration of EVs in an Active Distribution Grid -- A Norwegian Case Study
Authors:
Salman Zaferanlouei,
Venkatachalam Lakshmanan,
Sigurd Bjarghov,
Hossein Farahmand,
Magnus Korpås
Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce an application of a high-performance MultiPeriod AC Optimal Power Flow (MPOPF) solver, called "BATTPOWER", to simulate active distribution grids for a near-future scenario. A large-scale Norwegian distribution grid along with a large population of Electric Vehicles (EV) are here taken as the case-study. We suggest and analyse three operational strategies (in terms of co…
▽ More
In this paper, we introduce an application of a high-performance MultiPeriod AC Optimal Power Flow (MPOPF) solver, called "BATTPOWER", to simulate active distribution grids for a near-future scenario. A large-scale Norwegian distribution grid along with a large population of Electric Vehicles (EV) are here taken as the case-study. We suggest and analyse three operational strategies (in terms of control of charge scheduling fleet of EV) for the Distribution System Operator (DSO): (a) uncoordinated/dumb charge scheduling, (b) coordinated charge scheduling with the objective of energy cost-minimisation without operational constraints of the grid, and (c) coordinated charge scheduling with the objective of energy cost-minimisation along with the operational constraints of the grid. The results demonstrate that the uncoordinated charging would lead to: 1) overloading of lines and transformers when the share of EVs is above 20%, and 2) higher operational costs than the proposed control strategies of (b) and (c). In strategy (b) operational line/transformer limits are violated when the populations of EVs are growing above 36%. This implies that current market design must be altered to allow active control of a large proportion of DERs within grid operational limits to achieve cost minimization at system level. To our knowledge, the work presented in this paper is the first ever attempt to do a comprehensive analysis of the impact of EV charging demand on a real Norwegian distribution grid. Moreover, the inference of the analysis says that the Norwegian distribution networks are more prone to congestion problems than the voltage problems for the EV demand which includes a smart charging scheme accounting for grid conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2021; v1 submitted 4 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
BATTPOWER Toolbox: Memory-Efficient and High-Performance Multi-Period AC Optimal Power Flow Solver
Authors:
Salman Zaferanlouei,
Hossein Farahmand,
Vijay Venu Vadlamudi,
Magnus Korpås
Abstract:
With the introduction of massive renewable energy sources and storage devices, the traditional process of grid operation must be improved in order to be safe, reliable, fast responsive and cost efficient, and in this regard power flow solvers are indispensable. In this paper, we introduce an Interior Point-based (IP) Multi-Period AC Optimal Power Flow (MPOPF) solver for the integration of Stationa…
▽ More
With the introduction of massive renewable energy sources and storage devices, the traditional process of grid operation must be improved in order to be safe, reliable, fast responsive and cost efficient, and in this regard power flow solvers are indispensable. In this paper, we introduce an Interior Point-based (IP) Multi-Period AC Optimal Power Flow (MPOPF) solver for the integration of Stationary Energy Storage Systems (SESS) and Electric Vehicles (EV). The primary methodology is based on: 1) analytic and exact calculation of partial differential equations of the Lagrangian sub-problem, and 2) exploiting the sparse structure and pattern of the coefficient matrix of Newton-Raphson approach in the IP algorithm. Extensive results of the application of proposed methods on several benchmark test systems are presented and elaborated, where the advantages and disadvantages of different existing algorithms for the solution of MPOPF, from the standpoint of computational efficiency, are brought forward. We compare the computational performance of the proposed Schur-Complement algorithm with a direct sparse LU solver. The comparison is performed for two different applicational purposes: SESS and EV. The results suggest the substantial computational performance of Schur-Complement algorithm in comparison with that of a direct LU solver when the number of storage devices and optimisation horizon increase for both cases of SESS and EV. Also, some situations where computational performance is inferior are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2021; v1 submitted 23 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
