The 3x3 rooks graph is the unique smallest graph with lazy cop number 3
Authors:
Brendan W. Sullivan,
Nikolas Townsend,
Mikayla Werzanski
Abstract:
In the ordinary version of the pursuit-evasion game "cops and robbers", a team of cops and a robber occupy vertices of a graph and alternately move along the graph's edges, with perfect information about each other. If a cop lands on the robber, the cops win; if the robber can evade the cops indefinitely, he wins. In the variant "lazy cops and robbers", the cops may only choose one member of their…
▽ More
In the ordinary version of the pursuit-evasion game "cops and robbers", a team of cops and a robber occupy vertices of a graph and alternately move along the graph's edges, with perfect information about each other. If a cop lands on the robber, the cops win; if the robber can evade the cops indefinitely, he wins. In the variant "lazy cops and robbers", the cops may only choose one member of their squad to make a move when it's their turn. The minimum number of cops (respectively lazy cops) required to catch the robber is called the "cop number" (resp. "lazy cop number") of G and is denoted $c(G)$ (resp. $c_L(G)$). Previous work by Beveridge at al. has shown that the Petersen graph is the unique graph on ten vertices with $c(G)=3$, and all graphs on nine or fewer vertices have $c(G)\leq 2$. (This was a self-contained mathematical proof of a result found by computational search by Baird and Bonato.) In this article, we prove a similar result for lazy cops, namely that the 3x3 rooks graph ($K_3\square K_3$) is the unique graph on nine vertices which requires three lazy cops, and a graph on eight or fewer vertices requires at most two lazy cops.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
