Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Weld, E

Nuclear Dimension for Virtually Abelian Groups

Authors: Frankie Chan, S. Joseph Lippert, Iason Moutzouris, Ellen Weld

Abstract: Let $G$ be a finitely generated virtually abelian group. We show that the Hirsch length, $h(G)$, is equal to the nuclear dimension of its group $C^*$-algebra, $\dim_{nuc}(C^*(G))$. We then specialize our attention to a generalization of crystallographic groups dubbed $\textit{crystal-like}$. We demonstrate that in this scenario a $\textit{point group}$ is well defined and the order of this point g… ▽ More Let $G$ be a finitely generated virtually abelian group. We show that the Hirsch length, $h(G)$, is equal to the nuclear dimension of its group $C^*$-algebra, $\dim_{nuc}(C^*(G))$. We then specialize our attention to a generalization of crystallographic groups dubbed $\textit{crystal-like}$. We demonstrate that in this scenario a $\textit{point group}$ is well defined and the order of this point group is preserved by $C^*$-isomorphism. In addition, we provide a counter-example to $C^*$-superrigidity within this crystal-like setting. △ Less

Submitted 29 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Comments: 14 pages

MSC Class: 2D10; 22D25; 46L05

The Topology of the Unitary Dual of Crystallography Groups

Authors: Frankie Chan, Ellen Weld

Abstract: We provide a procedure for generating the irreducible representations of crystallography groups in any dimension. We also furnish a strategy to investigate the topology of the unitary dual of a crystallography group using sequences of matrices. All irreducible representations (up to unitary equivalence) of the dimension 3 crystallography group 90 and some calculations involving sequences of these… ▽ More We provide a procedure for generating the irreducible representations of crystallography groups in any dimension. We also furnish a strategy to investigate the topology of the unitary dual of a crystallography group using sequences of matrices. All irreducible representations (up to unitary equivalence) of the dimension 3 crystallography group 90 and some calculations involving sequences of these irreducible representations are included as a proof of concept of this procedure and strategy. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

Comments: 29 pages

Multiplier algebras of $L^p$-operator algebras

Authors: Andrey Blinov, Alonso Delfín, Ellen Weld

Abstract: It is known that the multiplier algebra of an approximately unital and nondegenerate $L^p$-operator algebra is again an $L^p$-operator algebra. In this paper we investigate examples that drop both hypotheses. In particular, we show that the multiplier algebra of $T_2^p$, the algebra of strictly upper triangular $2 \times 2$ matrices acting on $\ell_2^p$, is still an $L^p$-operator algebra for any… ▽ More It is known that the multiplier algebra of an approximately unital and nondegenerate $L^p$-operator algebra is again an $L^p$-operator algebra. In this paper we investigate examples that drop both hypotheses. In particular, we show that the multiplier algebra of $T_2^p$, the algebra of strictly upper triangular $2 \times 2$ matrices acting on $\ell_2^p$, is still an $L^p$-operator algebra for any $p$. To contrast this result, we first provide a thorough study of the augmentation ideal of $\ell^1(G)$ for a discrete group $G$. We use this ideal to define a family of nonapproximately unital degenerate $L^p$-operator algebras, $F_{0}^p(\Bbb{Z}/3\Bbb{Z})$, whose multiplier algebras cannot be represented on any $L^q$-space for any $q \in [1, \infty)$ as long as $p \in [1, p_0] \cup [p_0', \infty)$, where $p_0=1.606$ and $p_0'$ is its Hölder conjugate. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2024; v1 submitted 24 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: AMSLaTeX; 26 pages. Version 3 is the accepted version to appear in the Pacific Journal of Mathematics

MSC Class: Primary 46H15; 46H35; Secondary 47L10

Journal ref: Pacific J. Math. 333 (2024) 197-227

Connective Bieberbach groups

Authors: Marius Dadarlat, Ellen Weld

Abstract: We prove that a Bieberbach group with trivial center is not connective and use this property to show that a Bieberbach group is connective if and only if it is poly-Z. We prove that a Bieberbach group with trivial center is not connective and use this property to show that a Bieberbach group is connective if and only if it is poly-Z. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2021; v1 submitted 3 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Comments: Revised version, it includes an improved Corollary 1.3 and new references