Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Tirel, C J

Boundaries of Baumslag-Solitar Groups

Authors: Craig R. Guilbault, Molly A. Moran, Carrie J. Tirel

Abstract: A $\mathcal{Z}$-structure on a group $G$ was introduced by Bestvina in order to extend the notion of a group boundary beyond the realm of CAT(0) and hyperbolic groups. A refinement of this notion, introduced by Farrell and Lafont, includes a $G$-equivariance requirement, and is known as an $\mathcal{EZ}$-structure. The general questions of which groups admit $\mathcal{Z}$- or $\mathcal{EZ}$-struct… ▽ More A $\mathcal{Z}$-structure on a group $G$ was introduced by Bestvina in order to extend the notion of a group boundary beyond the realm of CAT(0) and hyperbolic groups. A refinement of this notion, introduced by Farrell and Lafont, includes a $G$-equivariance requirement, and is known as an $\mathcal{EZ}$-structure. The general questions of which groups admit $\mathcal{Z}$- or $\mathcal{EZ}$-structures remain open. In this paper we add to the current knowledge by showing that all Baumslag-Solitar groups admit $\mathcal{EZ}$-structures and all generalized Baumslag-Solitar groups admit $\mathcal{Z}$-structures. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Comments: 18 pages, 3 figures

MSC Class: 20F65

Journal ref: Algebr. Geom. Topol. 19 (2019) 2077-2097

On the dimension of Z-sets

Authors: Craig R. Guilbault, Carrie J. Tirel

Abstract: We offer a short and elementary proof that, for a Z-set A in a finite-dimensional ANR Y, dimA<dimY. This result is relevant to the study of group boundaries. The original proof by Bestvina and Mess relied on cohomological dimension theory. We offer a short and elementary proof that, for a Z-set A in a finite-dimensional ANR Y, dimA<dimY. This result is relevant to the study of group boundaries. The original proof by Bestvina and Mess relied on cohomological dimension theory. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2013; originally announced July 2013.

Comments: 4 pages, no figures

Z-Structures on Product Groups

Authors: Carrie J. Tirel

Abstract: A Z-structure on a group G, defined by M. Bestvina, is a pair (\hat{X}, Z) of spaces such that \hat{X} is a compact ER, Z is a Z-set in \hat{X}, G acts properly and cocompactly on X=\hat{X}\Z, and the collection of translates of any compact set in X forms a null sequence in \hat{X}. It is natural to ask whether a given group admits a Z-structure. In this paper, we will show that if two groups each… ▽ More A Z-structure on a group G, defined by M. Bestvina, is a pair (\hat{X}, Z) of spaces such that \hat{X} is a compact ER, Z is a Z-set in \hat{X}, G acts properly and cocompactly on X=\hat{X}\Z, and the collection of translates of any compact set in X forms a null sequence in \hat{X}. It is natural to ask whether a given group admits a Z-structure. In this paper, we will show that if two groups each admit a Z-structure, then so do their free and direct products. △ Less

Submitted 1 October, 2010; originally announced October 2010.

Journal ref: Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11 (2011) 2587-2625