Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Svindland, G

Bipolar Theorems for Sets of Non-negative Random Variables

Authors: Johannes Langner, Gregor Svindland

Abstract: This paper assumes a robust, in general not dominated, probabilistic framework and provides necessary and sufficient conditions for a bipolar representation of subsets of the set of all quasi-sure equivalence classes of non-negative random variables, without any further conditions on the underlying measure space. This generalizes and unifies existing bipolar theorems proved under stronger assumpti… ▽ More This paper assumes a robust, in general not dominated, probabilistic framework and provides necessary and sufficient conditions for a bipolar representation of subsets of the set of all quasi-sure equivalence classes of non-negative random variables, without any further conditions on the underlying measure space. This generalizes and unifies existing bipolar theorems proved under stronger assumptions on the robust framework. Applications are in areas of robust financial modeling. △ Less

Submitted 13 November, 2024; v1 submitted 29 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

MSC Class: 46A20; 46E30; 46N10; 46N30; 60B11; 91G80

Building Resilience in Cybersecurity -- An Artificial Lab Approach

Authors: Kerstin Awiszus, Yannick Bell, Jan Lüttringhaus, Gregor Svindland, Alexander Voß, Stefan Weber

Abstract: Based on classical contagion models we introduce an artificial cyber lab: the digital twin of a complex cyber system in which possible cyber resilience measures may be implemented and tested. Using the lab, in numerical case studies, we identify two classes of measures to control systemic cyber risks: security- and topology-based interventions. We discuss the implications of our findings on select… ▽ More Based on classical contagion models we introduce an artificial cyber lab: the digital twin of a complex cyber system in which possible cyber resilience measures may be implemented and tested. Using the lab, in numerical case studies, we identify two classes of measures to control systemic cyber risks: security- and topology-based interventions. We discuss the implications of our findings on selected real-world cybersecurity measures currently applied in the insurance and regulation practice or under discussion for future cyber risk control. To this end, we provide a brief overview of the current cybersecurity regulation and emphasize the role of insurance companies as private regulators. Moreover, from an insurance point of view, we provide first attempts to design systemic cyber risk obligations and to measure the systemic risk contribution of individual policyholders. △ Less

Submitted 7 September, 2023; v1 submitted 9 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Modeling and Pricing Cyber Insurance -- Idiosyncratic, Systematic, and Systemic Risks

Authors: Kerstin Awiszus, Thomas Knispel, Irina Penner, Gregor Svindland, Alexander Voß, Stefan Weber

Abstract: The paper provides a comprehensive overview of modeling and pricing cyber insurance and includes clear and easily understandable explanations of the underlying mathematical concepts. We distinguish three main types of cyber risks: idiosyncratic, systematic, and systemic cyber risks. While for idiosyncratic and systematic cyber risks, classical actuarial and financial mathematics appear to be well-… ▽ More The paper provides a comprehensive overview of modeling and pricing cyber insurance and includes clear and easily understandable explanations of the underlying mathematical concepts. We distinguish three main types of cyber risks: idiosyncratic, systematic, and systemic cyber risks. While for idiosyncratic and systematic cyber risks, classical actuarial and financial mathematics appear to be well-suited, systemic cyber risks require more sophisticated approaches that capture both network and strategic interactions. In the context of pricing cyber insurance policies, issues of interdependence arise for both systematic and systemic cyber risks; classical actuarial valuation needs to be extended to include more complex methods, such as concepts of risk-neutral valuation and (set-valued) monetary risk measures. △ Less

Submitted 5 December, 2022; v1 submitted 18 August, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Asymptotic Analysis of Risk Premia Induced by Law-Invariant Risk Measures

Authors: Thomas Knispel, Roger J. A. Laeven, Gregor Svindland

Abstract: We analyze the limiting behavior of the risk premium associated with the Pareto optimal risk sharing contract in an infinitely expanding pool of risks under a general class of law-invariant risk measures encompassing rank-dependent utility preferences. We show that the corresponding convergence rate is typically only $n^{1/2}$ instead of the conventional $n$, with $n$ the multiplicity of risks in… ▽ More We analyze the limiting behavior of the risk premium associated with the Pareto optimal risk sharing contract in an infinitely expanding pool of risks under a general class of law-invariant risk measures encompassing rank-dependent utility preferences. We show that the corresponding convergence rate is typically only $n^{1/2}$ instead of the conventional $n$, with $n$ the multiplicity of risks in the pool, depending upon the precise risk preferences. △ Less

Submitted 4 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

On Farkas' Lemma and Related Propositions in BISH

Authors: Josef Berger, Gregor Svindland

Abstract: In this paper we analyse in the framework of constructive mathematics (BISH) the validity of Farkas' lemma and related propositions, namely the Fredholm alternative for solvability of systems of linear equations, optimality criteria in linear programming, Stiemke's lemma and the Superhedging Duality from mathematical finance, and von Neumann's minimax theorem with application to constructive game… ▽ More In this paper we analyse in the framework of constructive mathematics (BISH) the validity of Farkas' lemma and related propositions, namely the Fredholm alternative for solvability of systems of linear equations, optimality criteria in linear programming, Stiemke's lemma and the Superhedging Duality from mathematical finance, and von Neumann's minimax theorem with application to constructive game theory. △ Less

Submitted 9 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

MSC Class: 03B30; 03F60

Model Uncertainty: A Reverse Approach

Authors: Felix-Benedikt Liebrich, Marco Maggis, Gregor Svindland

Abstract: Robust models in mathematical finance replace the classical single probability measure by a sufficiently rich set of probability measures on the future states of the world to capture (Knightian) uncertainty about the "right" probabilities of future events. If this set of measures is nondominated, many results known from classical dominated frameworks cease to hold as probabilistic and analytic too… ▽ More Robust models in mathematical finance replace the classical single probability measure by a sufficiently rich set of probability measures on the future states of the world to capture (Knightian) uncertainty about the "right" probabilities of future events. If this set of measures is nondominated, many results known from classical dominated frameworks cease to hold as probabilistic and analytic tools crucial for the handling of dominated models fail. We investigate the consequences for the robust model when prominent results from the mathematical finance literature are postulate. In this vein, we categorise the Kreps-Yan property, robust variants of the Brannath-Schachermayer Bipolar Theorem, Fatou representations of risk measures, and aggregation in robust models. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2022; v1 submitted 14 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: 37 pages

MSC Class: 28A12; 46E30; 91G80

Model Spaces for Risk Measures

Authors: Felix-Benedikt Liebrich, Gregor Svindland

Abstract: We show how risk measures originally defined in a model free framework in terms of acceptance sets and reference assets imply a meaningful underlying probability structure. Hereafter we construct a maximal domain of definition of the risk measure respecting the underlying ambiguity profile. We particularly emphasise liquidity effects and discuss the correspondence between properties of the risk me… ▽ More We show how risk measures originally defined in a model free framework in terms of acceptance sets and reference assets imply a meaningful underlying probability structure. Hereafter we construct a maximal domain of definition of the risk measure respecting the underlying ambiguity profile. We particularly emphasise liquidity effects and discuss the correspondence between properties of the risk measure and the structure of this domain as well as subdifferentiability properties. Keywords: Model free risk assessment, extension of risk measures, continuity properties of risk measures, subgradients. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2017; v1 submitted 3 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: Preprint version

MSC Class: 46B42; 91B30; 91G80

Journal ref: Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Vol. 77, pp. 150-165 (2017)

The Fatou Closedness under Model Uncertainty

Authors: Marco Maggis, Thilo Meyer-Brandis, Gregor Svindland

Abstract: We provide a characterization in terms of Fatou closedness for weakly closed monotone convex sets in the space of $\mathcal{P}$-quasisure bounded random variables, where $\mathcal{P}$ is a (possibly non-dominated) class of probability measures. Applications of our results lie within robust versions the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing or dual representation of convex risk measures. We provide a characterization in terms of Fatou closedness for weakly closed monotone convex sets in the space of $\mathcal{P}$-quasisure bounded random variables, where $\mathcal{P}$ is a (possibly non-dominated) class of probability measures. Applications of our results lie within robust versions the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing or dual representation of convex risk measures. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2018; v1 submitted 13 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

MSC Class: 31A15; 46A20; 46E30; 60A99; 91B30

Which eligible assets are compatible with comonotonic capital requirements?

Authors: Pablo Koch-Medina, Cosimo Munari, Gregor Svindland

Abstract: Within the context of capital adequacy, we study comonotonicity of risk measures in terms of the primitives of the theory: acceptance sets and eligible, or reference, assets. We show that comonotonicity cannot be characterized by the properties of the acceptance set alone and heavily depends on the choice of the eligible asset. In fact, in many important cases, comonotonicity is only compatible wi… ▽ More Within the context of capital adequacy, we study comonotonicity of risk measures in terms of the primitives of the theory: acceptance sets and eligible, or reference, assets. We show that comonotonicity cannot be characterized by the properties of the acceptance set alone and heavily depends on the choice of the eligible asset. In fact, in many important cases, comonotonicity is only compatible with risk-free eligible assets. The incompatibility with risky eligible assets is systematic whenever the acceptability criterion is based on Value at Risk or any convex distortion risk measure such as Expected Shortfall. These findings qualify and arguably call for a critical appraisal of the meaning and the role of comonotonicity within a capital adequacy context. △ Less

Submitted 20 January, 2021; v1 submitted 17 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Robust Optimal Risk Sharing and Risk Premia in Expanding Pools

Authors: Thomas Knispel, Roger J. A. Laeven, Gregor Svindland

Abstract: We consider the problem of optimal risk sharing in a pool of cooperative agents. We analyze the asymptotic behavior of the certainty equivalents and risk premia associated with the Pareto optimal risk sharing contract as the pool expands. We first study this problem under expected utility preferences with an objectively or subjectively given probabilistic model. Next, we develop a robust approach… ▽ More We consider the problem of optimal risk sharing in a pool of cooperative agents. We analyze the asymptotic behavior of the certainty equivalents and risk premia associated with the Pareto optimal risk sharing contract as the pool expands. We first study this problem under expected utility preferences with an objectively or subjectively given probabilistic model. Next, we develop a robust approach by explicitly taking uncertainty about the probabilistic model (ambiguity) into account. The resulting robust certainty equivalents and risk premia compound risk and ambiguity aversion. We provide explicit results on their limits and rates of convergence, induced by Pareto optimal risk sharing in expanding pools. △ Less

Submitted 26 January, 2016; originally announced January 2016.