-
Criticality for Maker-Breaker domination games with predomination
Authors:
Csilla Bujtás,
Pakanun Dokyeesun,
Sandi Klavžar,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
A predominated graph is a pair $(G,D)$, where $G$ is a graph and the vertices in $D\subseteq V(G)$ are considered already dominated. Maker-Breaker domination game critical (MBD critical) predominated graphs are introduced as the predominated graphs $(G,D)$ on which Staller wins the game, but Dominator wins on $(G, D \cup \{v\})$ for every vertex $v \in V(G) \setminus D$.
Tools are developed for…
▽ More
A predominated graph is a pair $(G,D)$, where $G$ is a graph and the vertices in $D\subseteq V(G)$ are considered already dominated. Maker-Breaker domination game critical (MBD critical) predominated graphs are introduced as the predominated graphs $(G,D)$ on which Staller wins the game, but Dominator wins on $(G, D \cup \{v\})$ for every vertex $v \in V(G) \setminus D$.
Tools are developed for handling the Maker-Breaker domination game on trees which lead to a characterization of Staller-win predominated trees. MBD critical predominated trees are characterized and an algorithm is designed which verifies in linear time whether a given predominated tree is MBD critical. A large class of MBD critical predominated cacti is presented and Maker-Breaker critical hypergraphs constructed.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Poset Positional Games
Authors:
Guillaume Bagan,
Eric Duchêne,
Florian Galliot,
Valentin Gledel,
Mirjana Mikalački,
Nacim Oijid,
Aline Parreau,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
We propose a generalization of positional games, supplementing them with a restriction on the order in which the elements of the board are allowed to be claimed. We introduce poset positional games, which are positional games with an additional structure -- a poset on the elements of the board. Throughout the game play, based on this poset and the set of the board elements that are claimed up to t…
▽ More
We propose a generalization of positional games, supplementing them with a restriction on the order in which the elements of the board are allowed to be claimed. We introduce poset positional games, which are positional games with an additional structure -- a poset on the elements of the board. Throughout the game play, based on this poset and the set of the board elements that are claimed up to that point, we reduce the set of available moves for the player whose turn it is -- an element of the board can only be claimed if all the smaller elements in the poset are already claimed.
We proceed to analyse these games in more detail, with a prime focus on the most studied convention, the Maker-Breaker games. First we build a general framework around poset positional games. Then, we perform a comprehensive study of the complexity of determining the game outcome, conditioned on the structure of the family of winning sets on the one side and the structure of the poset on the other.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2024; v1 submitted 11 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Generalized saturation game
Authors:
Balázs Patkós,
Miloš Stojaković,
Jelena Stratijev,
Máté Vizer
Abstract:
We study the following game version of the generalized graph Turán problem. For two fixed graphs F and H, two players, Max and Mini, alternately claim unclaimed edges of the complete graph Kn such that the graph G of the claimed edges must remain F-free throughout the game. The game ends when no further edges can be claimed, i.e. when G becomes F-saturated. The H-score of the game is the number of…
▽ More
We study the following game version of the generalized graph Turán problem. For two fixed graphs F and H, two players, Max and Mini, alternately claim unclaimed edges of the complete graph Kn such that the graph G of the claimed edges must remain F-free throughout the game. The game ends when no further edges can be claimed, i.e. when G becomes F-saturated. The H-score of the game is the number of copies of H in G. Max aims to maximize the H-score, while Mini wants to minimize it. The H-score of the game when both players play optimally is denoted by s1(n, #H, F) when Max starts, and by s2(n, #H, F) when Mini starts. We study these values for several natural choices of F and H.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
On the Multi-Robber Damage Number
Authors:
Miloš Stojaković,
Lasse Wulf
Abstract:
We study a variant of the Cops and Robbers game on graphs in which the robbers damage the visited vertices, aiming to maximize the number of damaged vertices. For that game with one cop against $s$ robbers a conjecture was made by Carlson, Halloran and Reinhart that the cop can save three vertices from being damaged as soon as the maximum degree of the base graph is at least $\binom{s}{2} + 2$.…
▽ More
We study a variant of the Cops and Robbers game on graphs in which the robbers damage the visited vertices, aiming to maximize the number of damaged vertices. For that game with one cop against $s$ robbers a conjecture was made by Carlson, Halloran and Reinhart that the cop can save three vertices from being damaged as soon as the maximum degree of the base graph is at least $\binom{s}{2} + 2$.
We are able to verify the conjecture and prove that it is tight once we add the assumption that the base graph is triangle free. We also study the game without that assumption, disproving the conjecture in full generality and further attempting to locate the smallest maximum degree of a base graph which guarantees that the cop can save three vertices against $s$ robbers. We show that this number is between $2\binom{s}{2} - 3$ and $2\binom{s}{2} + 1$.
Furthermore, after the game has been previously studied with one cop and multiple robbers, as well as with one robber and multiple cops, we initiate the study of the game with two cops and two robbers. In the case when the base graph is a cycle we determine the exact number of damaged vertices. Additionally, when the base graph is a path we provide bounds that differ by an additive constant.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2024; v1 submitted 22 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Avoider-Enforcer Game is NP-hard
Authors:
Tillmann Miltzow,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
In an Avoider-Enforcer game, we are given a hypergraph. Avoider and Enforcer alternate in claiming an unclaimed vertex, until all the vertices of the hypergraph are claimed. Enforcer wins if Avoider claims all vertices of an edge; Avoider wins otherwise. We show that it is NP-hard to decide if Avoider has a winning strategy.
In an Avoider-Enforcer game, we are given a hypergraph. Avoider and Enforcer alternate in claiming an unclaimed vertex, until all the vertices of the hypergraph are claimed. Enforcer wins if Avoider claims all vertices of an edge; Avoider wins otherwise. We show that it is NP-hard to decide if Avoider has a winning strategy.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
The Constructor-Blocker Game
Authors:
Balázs Patkós,
Miloš Stojaković,
Máté Vizer
Abstract:
We study the following game version of the generalized graph Turán problem. For two fixed graphs $F$ and $H$, two players, Constructor and Blocker, alternately claim unclaimed edges of the complete graph $K_n$. Constructor can only claim edges so that he never claims all edges of any copy of $F$, i.e. his graph must remain $F$-free, while Blocker can claim unclaimed edges without restrictions. The…
▽ More
We study the following game version of the generalized graph Turán problem. For two fixed graphs $F$ and $H$, two players, Constructor and Blocker, alternately claim unclaimed edges of the complete graph $K_n$. Constructor can only claim edges so that he never claims all edges of any copy of $F$, i.e. his graph must remain $F$-free, while Blocker can claim unclaimed edges without restrictions. The game ends when Constructor cannot claim further edges or when all edges have been claimed. The score of the game is the number of copies of $H$ with all edges claimed by Constructor. Constructor's aim is to maximize the score, while Blocker tries to keep the score as low as possible. We denote by $g(n,H,F)$ the score of the game when both players play optimally and Constructor starts the game.
In this paper, we obtain the exact value of $g(n,H,F)$ when both $F$ and $H$ are stars and when $F=P_4$, $H=P_3$. We determine the asymptotics of $g(n,H,F)$ when $F$ is a star and $H$ is a tree and when $F=P_5$, $H=K_3$, and we derive upper and lower bounds on $g(n,P_4,P_5)$.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2023; v1 submitted 28 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
The Toucher-Isolator game
Authors:
Chris Dowden,
Mihyun Kang,
Mirjana Mikalački,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
We introduce a new positional game called `Toucher-Isolator', which is a quantitative version of a Maker-Breaker type game. The playing board is the set of edges of a given graph G, and the two players, Toucher and Isolator, claim edges alternately. The aim of Toucher is to `touch' as many vertices as possible (i.e. to maximise the number of vertices that are incident to at least one of her chosen…
▽ More
We introduce a new positional game called `Toucher-Isolator', which is a quantitative version of a Maker-Breaker type game. The playing board is the set of edges of a given graph G, and the two players, Toucher and Isolator, claim edges alternately. The aim of Toucher is to `touch' as many vertices as possible (i.e. to maximise the number of vertices that are incident to at least one of her chosen edges), and the aim of Isolator is to minimise the number of vertices that are so touched.
We analyse the number of untouched vertices u(G) at the end of the game when both Toucher and Isolator play optimally, obtaining results both for general graphs and for particularly interesting classes of graphs, such as cycles, paths, trees, and k-regular graphs. We also provide tight examples.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Semi-random graph process
Authors:
Omri Ben-Eliezer,
Dan Hefetz,
Gal Kronenberg,
Olaf Parczyk,
Clara Shikhelman,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
We introduce and study a novel semi-random multigraph process, described as follows. The process starts with an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In every round of the process, one vertex $v$ of the graph is picked uniformly at random and independently of all previous rounds. We then choose an additional vertex (according to a strategy of our choice) and connect it by an edge to $v$.
For various natu…
▽ More
We introduce and study a novel semi-random multigraph process, described as follows. The process starts with an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In every round of the process, one vertex $v$ of the graph is picked uniformly at random and independently of all previous rounds. We then choose an additional vertex (according to a strategy of our choice) and connect it by an edge to $v$.
For various natural monotone increasing graph properties $P$, we prove tight upper and lower bounds on the minimum (extended over the set of all possible strategies) number of rounds required by the process to obtain, with high probability, a graph that satisfies $P$. Along the way, we show that the process is general enough to approximate (using suitable strategies) several well-studied random graph models.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2019; v1 submitted 6 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Hamiltonian Maker-Breaker games on small graphs
Authors:
Miloš Stojaković,
Nikola Trkulja
Abstract:
We look at the unbiased Maker-Breaker Hamiltonicity game played on the edge set of a complete graph $K_n$, where Maker's goal is to claim a Hamiltonian cycle. First, we prove that, independent of who starts, Maker can win the game for $n = 8$ and $n = 9$. Then we use an inductive argument to show that, independent of who starts, Maker can win the game if and only if $n \geq 8$. This, in particular…
▽ More
We look at the unbiased Maker-Breaker Hamiltonicity game played on the edge set of a complete graph $K_n$, where Maker's goal is to claim a Hamiltonian cycle. First, we prove that, independent of who starts, Maker can win the game for $n = 8$ and $n = 9$. Then we use an inductive argument to show that, independent of who starts, Maker can win the game if and only if $n \geq 8$. This, in particular, resolves in the affirmative the long-standing conjecture of Papaioannou.
We also study two standard positional games related to Hamiltonicity game. For Hamiltonian Path game, we show that Maker can claim a Hamiltonian path if and only if $n \geq 5$, independent of who starts. Next, we look at Fixed Hamiltonian Path game, where the goal of Maker is to claim a Hamiltonian path between two predetermined vertices. We prove that if Maker starts the game, he wins if and only if $n \geq 7$, and if Breaker starts, Maker wins if and only if $n \geq 8$. Using this result, we are able to improve the previously best upper bound on the smallest number of edges a graph on $n$ vertices can have, knowing that Maker can win the Maker-Breaker Hamiltonicity game played on its edges.
To resolve the outcomes of the mentioned games on small (finite) boards, we devise algorithms for efficiently searching game trees and then obtain our results with the help of a computer.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2018; v1 submitted 24 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Fast strategies in biased Maker--Breaker games
Authors:
Mirjana Mikalački,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
We study the biased $(1:b)$ Maker--Breaker positional games, played on the edge set of the complete graph on $n$ vertices, $K_n$. Given Breaker's bias $b$, possibly depending on $n$, we determine the bounds for the minimal number of moves, depending on $b$, in which Maker can win in each of the two standard graph games, the Perfect Matching game and the Hamilton Cycle game.
We study the biased $(1:b)$ Maker--Breaker positional games, played on the edge set of the complete graph on $n$ vertices, $K_n$. Given Breaker's bias $b$, possibly depending on $n$, we determine the bounds for the minimal number of moves, depending on $b$, in which Maker can win in each of the two standard graph games, the Perfect Matching game and the Hamilton Cycle game.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2018; v1 submitted 16 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
On saturation games
Authors:
Dan Hefetz,
Michael Krivelevich,
Alon Naor,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
A graph $G = (V,E)$ is said to be saturated with respect to a monotone increasing graph property ${\mathcal P}$, if $G \notin {\mathcal P}$ but $G \cup \{e\} \in {\mathcal P}$ for every $e \in \binom{V}{2} \setminus E$. The saturation game $(n, {\mathcal P})$ is played as follows. Two players, called Mini and Max, progressively build a graph $G \subseteq K_n$, which does not satisfy…
▽ More
A graph $G = (V,E)$ is said to be saturated with respect to a monotone increasing graph property ${\mathcal P}$, if $G \notin {\mathcal P}$ but $G \cup \{e\} \in {\mathcal P}$ for every $e \in \binom{V}{2} \setminus E$. The saturation game $(n, {\mathcal P})$ is played as follows. Two players, called Mini and Max, progressively build a graph $G \subseteq K_n$, which does not satisfy ${\mathcal P}$. Starting with the empty graph on $n$ vertices, the two players take turns adding edges $e \in \binom{V(K_n)}{2} \setminus E(G)$, for which $G \cup \{e\} \notin {\mathcal P}$, until no such edge exists (i.e. until $G$ becomes ${\mathcal P}$-saturated), at which point the game is over. Max's goal is to maximize the length of the game, whereas Mini aims to minimize it. The score of the game, denoted by $s(n, {\mathcal P})$, is the number of edges in $G$ at the end of the game, assuming both players follow their optimal strategies. We prove lower and upper bounds on the score of games in which the property the players need to avoid is being $k$-connected, having chromatic number at least $k$, and admitting a matching of a given size. In doing so we demonstrate that the score of certain games can be as large as the Turán number or as low as the saturation number of the respective graph property. We also demonstrate that the score might strongly depend on the identity of the first player to move.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2015; v1 submitted 9 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
On the threshold for the Maker-Breaker $H$-game
Authors:
Rajko Nenadov,
Angelika Steger,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
We study the Maker-Breaker $H$-game played on the edge set of the random graph $G_{n,p}$. In this game two players, Maker and Breaker, alternately claim unclaimed edges of $G_{n,p}$, until all the edges are claimed. Maker wins if he claims all the edges of a copy of a fixed graph $H$; Breaker wins otherwise. In this paper we show that, with the exception of trees and triangles, the threshold for a…
▽ More
We study the Maker-Breaker $H$-game played on the edge set of the random graph $G_{n,p}$. In this game two players, Maker and Breaker, alternately claim unclaimed edges of $G_{n,p}$, until all the edges are claimed. Maker wins if he claims all the edges of a copy of a fixed graph $H$; Breaker wins otherwise. In this paper we show that, with the exception of trees and triangles, the threshold for an $H$-game is given by the threshold of the corresponding Ramsey property of $G_{n,p}$ with respect to the graph $H$.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2014;
originally announced January 2014.
-
Maker-Breaker games on random geometric graphs
Authors:
Andrew Beveridge,
Andrzej Dudek,
Alan Frieze,
Tobias Muller,
Milos Stojakovic
Abstract:
In a Maker-Breaker game on a graph $G$, Breaker and Maker alternately claim edges of $G$. Maker wins if, after all edges have been claimed, the graph induced by his edges has some desired property. We consider four Maker-Breaker games played on random geometric graphs. For each of our four games we show that if we add edges between $n$ points chosen uniformly at random in the unit square by order…
▽ More
In a Maker-Breaker game on a graph $G$, Breaker and Maker alternately claim edges of $G$. Maker wins if, after all edges have been claimed, the graph induced by his edges has some desired property. We consider four Maker-Breaker games played on random geometric graphs. For each of our four games we show that if we add edges between $n$ points chosen uniformly at random in the unit square by order of increasing edge-length then, with probability tending to one as $n\to\infty$, the graph becomes Maker-win the very moment it satisfies a simple necessary condition. In particular, with high probability, Maker wins the connectivity game as soon as the minimum degree is at least two; Maker wins the Hamilton cycle game as soon as the minimum degree is at least four; Maker wins the perfect matching game as soon as the minimum degree is at least two and every edge has at least three neighbouring vertices; and Maker wins the $H$-game as soon as there is a subgraph from a finite list of "minimal graphs". These results also allow us to give precise expressions for the limiting probability that $G(n,r)$ is Maker-win in each case, where $G(n,r)$ is the graph on $n$ points chosen uniformly at random on the unit square with an edge between two points if and only if their distance is at most $r$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2013;
originally announced September 2013.
-
Many collinear k-tuples with no k+1 collinear points
Authors:
József Solymosi,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
For every $k>3$, we give a construction of planar point sets with many collinear $k$-tuples and no collinear $(k+1)$-tuples. We show that there are $n_0=n_0(k)$ and $c=c(k)$ such that if $n\geq n_0$, then there exists a set of $n$ points in the plane that does not contain $k+1$ points on a line, but it contains at least $n^{2-\frac{c}{\sqrt{\log n}}}$ collinear $k$-tuples of points. Thus, we signi…
▽ More
For every $k>3$, we give a construction of planar point sets with many collinear $k$-tuples and no collinear $(k+1)$-tuples. We show that there are $n_0=n_0(k)$ and $c=c(k)$ such that if $n\geq n_0$, then there exists a set of $n$ points in the plane that does not contain $k+1$ points on a line, but it contains at least $n^{2-\frac{c}{\sqrt{\log n}}}$ collinear $k$-tuples of points. Thus, we significantly improve the previously best known lower bound for the largest number of collinear $k$-tuples in such a set, and get reasonably close to the trivial upper bound $O(n^2)$.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2013; v1 submitted 1 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
-
Doubly biased Maker-Breaker Connectivity game
Authors:
Dan Hefetz,
Mirjana Rakić,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
In this paper we study the (a : b) Maker-Breaker Connectivity game, played on the edge-set of the complete graph on n vertices. We determine the winner for almost all values of a and b.
In this paper we study the (a : b) Maker-Breaker Connectivity game, played on the edge-set of the complete graph on n vertices. We determine the winner for almost all values of a and b.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2011;
originally announced January 2011.
-
Consistent digital line segments
Authors:
Tobias Christ,
Dömötör Pálvölgyi,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
We introduce a novel and general approach for digitalization of line segments in the plane that satisfies a set of axioms naturally arising from Euclidean axioms. In particular, we show how to derive such a system of digital segments from any total order on the integers. As a consequence, using a well-chosen total order, we manage to define a system of digital segments such that all digital segmen…
▽ More
We introduce a novel and general approach for digitalization of line segments in the plane that satisfies a set of axioms naturally arising from Euclidean axioms. In particular, we show how to derive such a system of digital segments from any total order on the integers. As a consequence, using a well-chosen total order, we manage to define a system of digital segments such that all digital segments are, in Hausdorff metric, optimally close to their corresponding Euclidean segments, thus giving an explicit construction that resolves the main question of Chun et al.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2010;
originally announced September 2010.
-
On winning fast in Avoider-Enforcer games
Authors:
János Barát,
Miloš Stojaković
Abstract:
We analyze the duration of the unbiased Avoider-Enforcer game for three basic positional games. All the games are played on the edges of the complete graph on $n$ vertices, and Avoider's goal is to keep his graph outerplanar, diamond-free and $k$-degenerate, respectively. It is clear that all three games are Enforcer's wins, and our main interest lies in determining the largest number of moves A…
▽ More
We analyze the duration of the unbiased Avoider-Enforcer game for three basic positional games. All the games are played on the edges of the complete graph on $n$ vertices, and Avoider's goal is to keep his graph outerplanar, diamond-free and $k$-degenerate, respectively. It is clear that all three games are Enforcer's wins, and our main interest lies in determining the largest number of moves Avoider can play before losing.
Extremal graph theory offers a general upper bound for the number of Avoider's moves. As it turns out, for all three games we manage to obtain a lower bound that is just an additive constant away from that upper bound. In particular, we exhibit a strategy for Avoider to keep his graph outerplanar for at least $2n-8$ moves, being just 6 short of the maximum possible. A diamond-free graph can have at most $d(n)=\lceil\frac{3n-5}{2}\rceil$ edges, and we prove that Avoider can play for at least $d(n)-3$ moves. Finally, if $k$ is small compared to $n$, we show that Avoider can keep his graph $k$-degenerate for as many as $e(n)$ moves, where $e(n)$ is the maximum number of edges a $k$-degenerate graph can have.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2009;
originally announced October 2009.
-
Fast winning strategies in Avoider-Enforcer games
Authors:
Dan Hefetz,
Michael Krivelevich,
Miloš Stojaković,
Tibor Szabó
Abstract:
In numerous positional games the identity of the winner is easily determined. In this case one of the more interesting questions is not {\em who} wins but rather {\em how fast} can one win. These type of problems were studied earlier for Maker-Breaker games; here we initiate their study for unbiased Avoider-Enforcer games played on the edge set of the complete graph $K_n$ on $n$ vertices. For se…
▽ More
In numerous positional games the identity of the winner is easily determined. In this case one of the more interesting questions is not {\em who} wins but rather {\em how fast} can one win. These type of problems were studied earlier for Maker-Breaker games; here we initiate their study for unbiased Avoider-Enforcer games played on the edge set of the complete graph $K_n$ on $n$ vertices. For several games that are known to be an Enforcer's win, we estimate quite precisely the minimum number of moves Enforcer has to play in order to win. We consider the non-planarity game, the connectivity game and the non-bipartite game.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2008;
originally announced June 2008.
-
Positional games on random graphs
Authors:
Milos Stojakovic,
Tibor Szabo
Abstract:
We introduce and study Maker/Breaker-type positional games on random graphs. Our main concern is to determine the threshold probability $p_{F}$ for the existence of Maker's strategy to claim a member of $F$ in the unbiased game played on the edges of random graph $G(n,p)$, for various target families $F$ of winning sets. More generally, for each probability above this threshold we study the smal…
▽ More
We introduce and study Maker/Breaker-type positional games on random graphs. Our main concern is to determine the threshold probability $p_{F}$ for the existence of Maker's strategy to claim a member of $F$ in the unbiased game played on the edges of random graph $G(n,p)$, for various target families $F$ of winning sets. More generally, for each probability above this threshold we study the smallest bias $b$ such that Maker wins the $(1\:b)$ biased game. We investigate these functions for a number of basic games, like the connectivity game, the perfect matching game, the clique game and the Hamiltonian cycle game.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2006;
originally announced January 2006.
