-
Embedding onto Wheel-like Networks
Authors:
R. Sundara Rajan,
T. M. Rajalaxmi,
Sudeep Stephen,
A. Arul Shantrinal,
K. Jagadeesh Kumar
Abstract:
One of the important features of an interconnection network is its ability to efficiently simulate programs or parallel algorithms written for other architectures. Such a simulation problem can be mathematically formulated as a graph embedding problem. In this paper we compute the lower bound for dilation and congestion of embedding onto wheel-like networks. Further, we compute the exact dilation…
▽ More
One of the important features of an interconnection network is its ability to efficiently simulate programs or parallel algorithms written for other architectures. Such a simulation problem can be mathematically formulated as a graph embedding problem. In this paper we compute the lower bound for dilation and congestion of embedding onto wheel-like networks. Further, we compute the exact dilation of embedding wheel-like networks into hypertrees, proving that the lower bound obtained is sharp. Again, we compute the exact congestion of embedding windmill graphs into circulant graphs, proving that the lower bound obtained is sharp. Further, we compute the exact wirelength of embedding wheels and fans into 1,2-fault hamiltonian graphs. Using this we estimate the exact wirelength of embedding wheels and fans into circulant graphs, generalized Petersen graphs, augmented cubes, crossed cubes, Möbius cubes, twisted cubes, twisted $n$-cubes, locally twisted cubes, generalized twisted cubes, odd-dimensional cube connected cycle, hierarchical cubic networks, alternating group graphs, arrangement graphs, 3-regular planer hamiltonian graphs, star graphs, generalised matching networks, fully connected cubic networks, tori and 1-fault traceable graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Zero forcing in iterated line digraphs
Authors:
Daniela Ferrero,
Thomas Kalinowski,
Sudeep Stephen
Abstract:
Zero forcing is a propagation process on a graph, or digraph, defined in linear algebra to provide a bound for the minimum rank problem. Independently, zero forcing was introduced in physics, computer science and network science, areas where line digraphs are frequently used as models. Zero forcing is also related to power domination, a propagation process that models the monitoring of electrical…
▽ More
Zero forcing is a propagation process on a graph, or digraph, defined in linear algebra to provide a bound for the minimum rank problem. Independently, zero forcing was introduced in physics, computer science and network science, areas where line digraphs are frequently used as models. Zero forcing is also related to power domination, a propagation process that models the monitoring of electrical power networks.
In this paper we study zero forcing in iterated line digraphs and provide a relationship between zero forcing and power domination in line digraphs. In particular, for regular iterated line digraphs we determine the minimum rank/maximum nullity, zero forcing number and power domination number, and provide constructions to attain them. We conclude that regular iterated line digraphs present optimal minimum rank/maximum nullity, zero forcing number and power domination number, and apply our results to determine those parameters on some families of digraphs often used in applications.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2018; v1 submitted 10 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
The metric dimension of the circulant graph $C(n,\pm\{1,2,3,4\})$
Authors:
Cyriac Grigorious,
Thomas Kalinowski,
Joe Ryan,
Sudeep Stephen
Abstract:
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a connected graph and let $d(u,v)$ denote the distance between vertices $u,v \in V$. A metric basis for $G$ is a set $B\subseteq V$ of minimum cardinality such that no two vertices of $G$ have the same distances to all points of $B$. The cardinality of a metric basis of $G$ is called the metric dimension of $G$, denoted by $\dim(G)$. In this paper we determine the metric dimension…
▽ More
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a connected graph and let $d(u,v)$ denote the distance between vertices $u,v \in V$. A metric basis for $G$ is a set $B\subseteq V$ of minimum cardinality such that no two vertices of $G$ have the same distances to all points of $B$. The cardinality of a metric basis of $G$ is called the metric dimension of $G$, denoted by $\dim(G)$. In this paper we determine the metric dimension of the circulant graphs $C(n,\pm\{1,2,3,4\})$ for all values of $n$.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2017; v1 submitted 27 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
On the power domination number of de Bruijn and Kautz digraphs
Authors:
Cyriac Grigorious,
Thomas Kalinowski,
Joe Ryan,
Sudeep Stephen
Abstract:
Let $G=(V,A)$ be a directed graph without parallel arcs, and let $S\subseteq V$ be a set of vertices. Let the sequence $S=S_0\subseteq S_1\subseteq S_2\subseteq\cdots$ be defined as follows: $S_1$ is obtained from $S_0$ by adding all out-neighbors of vertices in $S_0$. For $k\geqslant 2$, $S_k$ is obtained from $S_{k-1}$ by adding all vertices $w$ such that for some vertex $v\in S_{k-1}$, $w$ is t…
▽ More
Let $G=(V,A)$ be a directed graph without parallel arcs, and let $S\subseteq V$ be a set of vertices. Let the sequence $S=S_0\subseteq S_1\subseteq S_2\subseteq\cdots$ be defined as follows: $S_1$ is obtained from $S_0$ by adding all out-neighbors of vertices in $S_0$. For $k\geqslant 2$, $S_k$ is obtained from $S_{k-1}$ by adding all vertices $w$ such that for some vertex $v\in S_{k-1}$, $w$ is the unique out-neighbor of $v$ in $V\setminus S_{k-1}$. We set $M(S)=S_0\cup S_1\cup\cdots$, and call $S$ a \emph{power dominating set} for $G$ if $M(S)=V(G)$. The minimum cardinality of such a set is called the \emph{power domination number} of $G$. In this paper, we determine the power domination numbers of de Bruijn and Kautz digraphs.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
A lower bound on the zero forcing number
Authors:
Randy Davila,
Thomas Kalinowski,
Sudeep Stephen
Abstract:
In this note, we study a dynamic vertex coloring for a graph $G$. In particular, one starts with a certain set of vertices black, and all other vertices white. Then, at each time step, a black vertex with exactly one white neighbor forces its white neighbor to become black. The initial set of black vertices is called a \emph{zero forcing set} if by iterating this process, all of the vertices in…
▽ More
In this note, we study a dynamic vertex coloring for a graph $G$. In particular, one starts with a certain set of vertices black, and all other vertices white. Then, at each time step, a black vertex with exactly one white neighbor forces its white neighbor to become black. The initial set of black vertices is called a \emph{zero forcing set} if by iterating this process, all of the vertices in $G$ become black. The \emph{zero forcing number} of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a zero forcing set in $G$, and is denoted by $Z(G)$. Davila and Kenter have conjectured in 2015 that $Z(G)\geq (g-3)(δ-2)+δ$ where $g$ and $δ$ denote the girth and the minimum degree of $G$, respectively. This conjecture has been proven for graphs with girth $g \leq 10$. In this note, we present a proof for $g \geq 5$, $δ\geq 2$, thereby settling the conjecture.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2018; v1 submitted 20 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Minimum rank and zero forcing number for butterfly networks
Authors:
Daniela Ferrero,
Cyriac Grigorious,
Thomas Kalinowski,
Joe Ryan,
Sudeep Stephen
Abstract:
The minimum rank of a simple graph $G$ is the smallest possible rank over all symmetric real matrices $A$ whose nonzero off-diagonal entries correspond to the edges of $G$. Using the zero forcing number, we prove that the minimum rank of the butterfly network is $\frac19\left[(3r+1)2^{r+1}-2(-1)^r\right]$ and that this is equal to the rank of its adjacency matrix.
The minimum rank of a simple graph $G$ is the smallest possible rank over all symmetric real matrices $A$ whose nonzero off-diagonal entries correspond to the edges of $G$. Using the zero forcing number, we prove that the minimum rank of the butterfly network is $\frac19\left[(3r+1)2^{r+1}-2(-1)^r\right]$ and that this is equal to the rank of its adjacency matrix.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2018; v1 submitted 25 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
On the Partition Dimension of Circulant Graphs
Authors:
Cyriac Grigorious,
Sudeep Stephen,
Bharati Rajan,
Mirka Miller,
Paul Manuel
Abstract:
For a vertex $v$ of a connected graph $G(V,E)$ and a subset $S$ of $V$, the distance between $v$ and $S$ is defined by $d(v,S)=min\{d(v,x):x \in S \}.$ For an ordered \emph{k}-partition $Π=\{S_1,S_2\ldots S_k\}$ of $V$, the representation of $v$ with respect to $Π$ is the $k$-vector $r(v|Π) =(d(v,S_1),d(v,S_2)\ldots d(v,S_k)).$ The $k$-partition $Π$ is a resolving partition if the $k$-vectors…
▽ More
For a vertex $v$ of a connected graph $G(V,E)$ and a subset $S$ of $V$, the distance between $v$ and $S$ is defined by $d(v,S)=min\{d(v,x):x \in S \}.$ For an ordered \emph{k}-partition $Π=\{S_1,S_2\ldots S_k\}$ of $V$, the representation of $v$ with respect to $Π$ is the $k$-vector $r(v|Π) =(d(v,S_1),d(v,S_2)\ldots d(v,S_k)).$ The $k$-partition $Π$ is a resolving partition if the $k$-vectors $r(v|Π)$, $v \in V$ are distinct. The minimum $k$ for which there is a resolving $k$-partition of $V$ is the \emph{partition dimension} of $G$. Salman et al.{\rm\cite{SaJaCh12}} claimed that \emph{partition dimension} of a class of circulant graphs $C(n,\pm \{1,2\})$, for all even $n\geq6$ is 4 and it is 3 when $n$ is odd. In this paper we obtain the partition dimension of circulant graphs $G=C(n, \pm \{1,2 \ldots j\}), 1\leq j < \lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor$, $n \geq(j+k)(j+1)$, $n \equiv \ k \ mod \ (2j)$ and $k$ and $2j$ are co-primes as, \begin{eqnarray*} pd(G) &=& j+1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ when \ j \ \ is \ even \ and\ all \ k=2m-1, 1 \leq m \leq j \\ pd(G)&=& j+1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ when \ j \ \ is \ odd \ and\ all \ k=2m, 1 \leq m \leq j. \end{eqnarray*}
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2016; v1 submitted 18 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.