Embeddings of local fields in simple algebras and simplicial structures on the Bruhat-Tits building
Authors:
Dr. Daniel Skodlerack
Abstract:
This article answers a question that naturally arises from the articles by Grabitz and Broussous "Pure elements and intertwining classes of simple strata in local central simple algebras" and Broussous and Lemaire "Buildings of GL(m,D) and Centralizers". For an Azumaya-Algebra A over a non-Archimedean local field F, Grabitz and Broussous have introduced embedding invariants for field embeddings, t…
▽ More
This article answers a question that naturally arises from the articles by Grabitz and Broussous "Pure elements and intertwining classes of simple strata in local central simple algebras" and Broussous and Lemaire "Buildings of GL(m,D) and Centralizers". For an Azumaya-Algebra A over a non-Archimedean local field F, Grabitz and Broussous have introduced embedding invariants for field embeddings, that is for pairs (E,a), where E is a field extension of F in A, and $a$ is a hereditary order which is normalised by E^x. On the other hand if we take such a field extension E and define B to be the centralizer of E in A, then G:=A^x and G_E:=B^x are sets of rational points of reductive groups defined over F and E respectively. Broussous and Lemaire have defined a map j_E: I^{E^x}\to I_E, where $I$ is the the Euclidean building of $G$, and I_E is the Euclidean building of G_E. The question which we address is to relate the embedding invariants to the behavior of the map j_E with respect to the simplicial structures of $I$ and I_E. I have to thank very much Prof. Zink from Homboldt University Berlin for his helpful remarks, the revision of the work and for giving my the interesting task.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2012; v1 submitted 26 March, 2009;
originally announced March 2009.
The centralizer of a classical group and Bruhat Tits buildings
Authors:
Dr. Daniel Skodlerack
Abstract:
This notes are additional remarks to an article of Broussous and Stevens [arXiv:math/0402228v1]. We consider a unitary group G over a non-Archimedean local field k_0 of residue characteristic different from two and an element β of the Lie algebra \mf{g} of G. Let H be the centralizer of β in G. We further assume k_0[β] to be semisimple. We prove that there is an affine H-equivariant map between th…
▽ More
This notes are additional remarks to an article of Broussous and Stevens [arXiv:math/0402228v1]. We consider a unitary group G over a non-Archimedean local field k_0 of residue characteristic different from two and an element β of the Lie algebra \mf{g} of G. Let H be the centralizer of β in G. We further assume k_0[β] to be semisimple. We prove that there is an affine H-equivariant map between the Bruhat-Tits buildings B(H)\ra B(G) which is compatible with the Lie-algebra filtrations (CLF) and maps apartments into apartments. The map is toral if β is separable. For simplicity let us now assume that β is separable, especially the centralizer bH of β in the reductive algebraic group defined by G is itself reductive, defined over k_0 and a product of Weil restrictions of classical groups. It will be proven that the map is unique by the CLF-property if no factor contains a split torus in the center. In general it is unique up to translation of B(H) if we assume CLF, affineness and the equivariance under the center of bH^0(k_0). The proofs are written for the general case where β is not separable.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2012; v1 submitted 26 March, 2009;
originally announced March 2009.
