Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Salnikov, D
-
Generalized network autoregressive modelling of longitudinal networks with application to presidential elections in the USA
Authors:
Guy Nason,
Daniel Salnikov,
Mario Cortina-Borja
Abstract:
Longitudinal networks are becoming increasingly relevant in the study of dynamic processes characterised by known or inferred community structure. Generalised Network Autoregressive (GNAR) models provide a parsimonious framework for exploiting the underlying network and multivariate time series. We introduce the community-$α$ GNAR model with interactions that exploits prior knowledge or exogenous…
▽ More
Longitudinal networks are becoming increasingly relevant in the study of dynamic processes characterised by known or inferred community structure. Generalised Network Autoregressive (GNAR) models provide a parsimonious framework for exploiting the underlying network and multivariate time series. We introduce the community-$α$ GNAR model with interactions that exploits prior knowledge or exogenous variables for analysing interactions within and between communities, and can describe serial correlation in longitudinal networks. We derive new explicit finite-sample error bounds that validate analysing high-dimensional longitudinal network data with GNAR models, and provide insights into their attractive properties. We further illustrate our approach by analysing the dynamics of $\textit{Red, Blue}$ and $\textit{Swing}$ states throughout presidential elections in the USA from 1976 to 2020, that is, a time series of length twelve on 51 time series (US states and Washington DC). Our analysis connects network autocorrelation to eight-year long terms, highlights a possible change in the system after the 2016 election, and a difference in behaviour between $\textit{Red}$ and $\textit{Blue}$ states.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Concentration inequalities for the sample correlation coefficient
Authors:
Daniel Salnikov
Abstract:
The sample correlation coefficient $R$ plays an important role in many statistical analyses. We study the moments of $R$ under the bivariate Gaussian model assumption, provide a novel approximation for its finite sample mean and connect it with known results for the variance. We exploit these approximations to present non-asymptotic concentration inequalities for $R$. Finally, we illustrate our re…
▽ More
The sample correlation coefficient $R$ plays an important role in many statistical analyses. We study the moments of $R$ under the bivariate Gaussian model assumption, provide a novel approximation for its finite sample mean and connect it with known results for the variance. We exploit these approximations to present non-asymptotic concentration inequalities for $R$. Finally, we illustrate our results in a simulation experiment that further validates the approximations presented in this work.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
A Constructive Proof of the Glivenko-Cantelli Theorem
Authors:
Daniel Salnikov
Abstract:
The Glivenko-Cantelli theorem states that the empirical distribution function converges uniformly almost surely to the theoretical distribution for a random variable $X \in \mathbb{R}$. This is an important result because it establishes the fact that sampling does capture the dispersion measure the distribution function $F$ imposes. In essence, sampling permits one to learn and infer the behavior…
▽ More
The Glivenko-Cantelli theorem states that the empirical distribution function converges uniformly almost surely to the theoretical distribution for a random variable $X \in \mathbb{R}$. This is an important result because it establishes the fact that sampling does capture the dispersion measure the distribution function $F$ imposes. In essence, sampling permits one to learn and infer the behavior of $F$ by only looking at observations from $X$. The probabilities that are inferred from samples $\mathbf{X}$ will become more precise as the sample size increases and more data becomes available. Therefore, it is valid to study distributions via samples. The proof present here is constructive, meaning that the result is derived directly from the fact that the empirical distribution function converges pointwise almost surely to the theoretical distribution. The work includes a proof of this preliminary statement and attempts to motivate the intuition one gets from sampling techniques when studying the regions in which a model concentrates probability. The sets where dispersion is described with precision by the empirical distribution function will eventually cover the entire sample space.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
