-
Monistic conception of geometry
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
One considers the monistic conception of a geometry, where there is only one fundamental quantity (world function). All other geometrical quantities a derivative quantities (functions of the world function). The monisitc conception of a geometry is compared with pluralistic conceptions of a geometry, where there are several independent fundamental geometrical quantities. A generalization of a plur…
▽ More
One considers the monistic conception of a geometry, where there is only one fundamental quantity (world function). All other geometrical quantities a derivative quantities (functions of the world function). The monisitc conception of a geometry is compared with pluralistic conceptions of a geometry, where there are several independent fundamental geometrical quantities. A generalization of a pluralistic conception of the proper Euclidean geometry appears to be inconsistent, if the generalized geometry is inhomogeneous. In particular, the Riemannian geometry appears to be inconsistent, in general, if it is obtained as a generalization of the pluralistic conception of the Euclidean geometry.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2010;
originally announced September 2010.
-
Logical reloading as overcoming of crisis in geometry
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
Properties of the logical reloading in the Euclidean geometry are considered. The logical reloading is a logical operation which replaces one system of basic concepts of a conception by another system of basic concepts of the same conception. The logical reloading does not change propositions of the conception. However, generalizations of the conception are different for different systems of basic…
▽ More
Properties of the logical reloading in the Euclidean geometry are considered. The logical reloading is a logical operation which replaces one system of basic concepts of a conception by another system of basic concepts of the same conception. The logical reloading does not change propositions of the conception. However, generalizations of the conception are different for different systems of basic concepts. It is conditioned by the fact, that some systems of basic concepts contain not only propositions of the conception, but also some attributes of this conception description. Properties of the logical reloading are demonstrated in the example of the proper Euclidean geometry, whose generalization leads to different results for different system of basic concepts.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2010; v1 submitted 11 May, 2010;
originally announced May 2010.
-
Abel Prize 2009 as a necessitation to discussion on geometry, or physicist versus geometers
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
Contemporary geometers do not acknowledge nonaxomatizable geometries. This fact means that our knowledge of geometry is poor. A perfect knowledge of geometry is important for "consumers of geometry" (physicists dealing with geometry of microcosm), because poor knowledge of geometry forces physicists to refuse from the orthodox geometrical paradigm and to use the quantum paradigm, which is a simp…
▽ More
Contemporary geometers do not acknowledge nonaxomatizable geometries. This fact means that our knowledge of geometry is poor. A perfect knowledge of geometry is important for "consumers of geometry" (physicists dealing with geometry of microcosm), because poor knowledge of geometry forces physicists to refuse from the orthodox geometrical paradigm and to use the quantum paradigm, which is a simple fitting, compensating our imperfect knowledge of geometry.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2009;
originally announced April 2009.
-
Geometries with intransitive equivalence relation
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
One considers geometry with the intransitive equaivalence relation. Such a geometry is a physical geometry, i.e. it is described completely by the world function, which is a half of the squared distance function. The physical geometry cannot be axiomatized, in general. It is obtained as a result of deformation of the proper Euclidean geometry. Class of physical geometries is more powerful, than…
▽ More
One considers geometry with the intransitive equaivalence relation. Such a geometry is a physical geometry, i.e. it is described completely by the world function, which is a half of the squared distance function. The physical geometry cannot be axiomatized, in general. It is obtained as a result of deformation of the proper Euclidean geometry. Class of physical geometries is more powerful, than the class of axiomatized geometries. The physical geometry admits one to describe such geometric properties as discreteness, granularity and limited divisibility. These properties are important in application to the space-time. They admits one to explain the discrimination properties of the space-time, which generate discrete parameters of elementary particles. Mathematical formalism of a physical geometry is very simple. The physical geometry is formulated in geometrical terms (in terms of points and world function) without a use of means of description (coordinate system, space dimension, manifold, etc.).
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2009; v1 submitted 13 July, 2008;
originally announced July 2008.
-
Different representations of Euclidean geometry and their application to the space-time geometry
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
Three different representation of the proper Euclidean geometry are considered. They differ in the number of basic elements, from which the geometrical objects are constructed. In E-representation there are three basic elements (point, segment, angle) and no additional structures. V-representation contains two basic elements (point, vector) and additional structure: linear vector space. In sigma-r…
▽ More
Three different representation of the proper Euclidean geometry are considered. They differ in the number of basic elements, from which the geometrical objects are constructed. In E-representation there are three basic elements (point, segment, angle) and no additional structures. V-representation contains two basic elements (point, vector) and additional structure: linear vector space. In sigma-representation there is only one basic element and additional structure: world function σ=ρ^{2}/2, where ρis the distance. The concept of distance appears in all representations. However, as a structure, determining the geometry, the distance appears only in the sigma-representation. The sigma-representation is most appropriate for modification of the proper Euclidean geometry. Practically any modification of the proper Euclidean geometry turns it into multivariant geometry, where there are many vectors Q_0Q_1, Q_0Q_1^{\prime},..., which are equal to the vector P_0P_1, but they are not equal between themselves, in general. Concept of multivariance is very important in application to the space-time geometry. The real space-time geometry is multivariant. Multivariance of the space-time geometry is responsible for quantum effects.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2011; v1 submitted 18 September, 2007;
originally announced September 2007.
-
Godel's theorem as a corollary of impossibility of complete axiomatization of geometry
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
Not any geometry can be axiomatized. The paradoxical Godel's theorem starts from the supposition that any geometry can be axiomatized and goes to the result, that not any geometry can be axiomatized. One considers example of two close geometries (Riemannian geometry and $σ$-Riemannian one), which are constructed by different methods and distinguish in some details. The Riemannian geometry remind…
▽ More
Not any geometry can be axiomatized. The paradoxical Godel's theorem starts from the supposition that any geometry can be axiomatized and goes to the result, that not any geometry can be axiomatized. One considers example of two close geometries (Riemannian geometry and $σ$-Riemannian one), which are constructed by different methods and distinguish in some details. The Riemannian geometry reminds such a geometry, which is only a part of the full geometry. Such a possibility is covered by the Godel's theorem.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2007; v1 submitted 6 September, 2007;
originally announced September 2007.
-
Non-Euclidean method of the generalized geometry construction and its application to space-time geometry
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
Non-Euclidean method of the generalized geometry construction is considered. According to this approach any generalized geometry is obtained as a result of deformation of the proper Euclidean geometry. The method may be applied for construction of space-time geometries. Uniform isotropic space-time geometry other, than that of Minkowski, is considered as an example. The problem of the geometrica…
▽ More
Non-Euclidean method of the generalized geometry construction is considered. According to this approach any generalized geometry is obtained as a result of deformation of the proper Euclidean geometry. The method may be applied for construction of space-time geometries. Uniform isotropic space-time geometry other, than that of Minkowski, is considered as an example. The problem of the geometrical objects existence and their temporal evolution may be considered in the constructed space-time geometry. Such a statement of the problem is impossible in the framework of the Riemannian space-time geometry. Existence and dynamics of microparticles is considered to be conditioned by existence of corresponding geometrical objects and their temporal evolution in the space-time. Geometrization of the particle mass and its momentum is produced.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2007; v1 submitted 19 February, 2007;
originally announced February 2007.
-
Crisis in the geometry development and its social consequences
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
The reasons of the crisis in the contemporary (Riemannian) geometry are discussed. The conventional method of the generalized geometries construction, based on a use of the topology, leads to a overdetermination of the Riemannian geometry. In other words, at the Riemannian geometry construction one uses the needless information (topology), which disagrees with other original axioms. The crisis m…
▽ More
The reasons of the crisis in the contemporary (Riemannian) geometry are discussed. The conventional method of the generalized geometries construction, based on a use of the topology, leads to a overdetermination of the Riemannian geometry. In other words, at the Riemannian geometry construction one uses the needless information (topology), which disagrees with other original axioms. The crisis manifests in the fact, that the mathematical community cannot see and does not want to see the overdetermination of the Riemannian geometry. The most geometers-topologists deny the alternative method of the generalized geometry construction, which does not uses the topology, because it does not contain theorems. Most geometers see the geometry presentation as a set of definitions and theorems. They cannot imagine the geometry presentation without customary theorems. As a result the most clever topologists, which have acknowledged the negligible role of the topology in the geometry construction and inconsistency of the conventional method of the generalized geometry construction, appear in the difficult situation (conflict with the mathematical community).
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2006;
originally announced September 2006.
-
Euclidean geometry as algorithm for construction of generalized geometries
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
It is shown that the generalized geometries may be obtained as a deformation of the proper Euclidean geometry. Algorithm of construction of any proposition S of the proper Euclidean geometry E may be described in terms of the Euclidean world function sigma_E in the form S(sigma_E). Replacing the Euclidean world function sigma_E by the world function sigma of the geometry G, one obtains the corre…
▽ More
It is shown that the generalized geometries may be obtained as a deformation of the proper Euclidean geometry. Algorithm of construction of any proposition S of the proper Euclidean geometry E may be described in terms of the Euclidean world function sigma_E in the form S(sigma_E). Replacing the Euclidean world function sigma_E by the world function sigma of the geometry G, one obtains the corresponding proposition S(sigma) of the generalized geometry G. Such a construction of the generalized geometries (known as T-geometries) uses well known algorithms of the proper Euclidean geometry and nothing besides. This method of the geometry construction is very simple and effective. Using T-geometry as the space-time geometry, one can construct the deterministic space-time geometries with primordially stochastic motion of free particles and geometrized particle mass. Such a space-time geometry defined properly (with quantum constant as an attribute of geometry) allows one to explain quantum effects as a result of the statistical description of the stochastic particle motion (without a use of quantum principles).
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2005;
originally announced November 2005.
-
New crisis in geometry?
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
The first crisis in the geometry arose in the beginning of XIXth century, when the mathematicians rejected the non-Euclidean geometry as a possible geometry of the real world. Now we observe unreasonable rejection of the non-Riemannian geometry by the official representatives of the contemporary geometry. Class of the Riemannian geometries appears to be too narrow for physical applications. The…
▽ More
The first crisis in the geometry arose in the beginning of XIXth century, when the mathematicians rejected the non-Euclidean geometry as a possible geometry of the real world. Now we observe unreasonable rejection of the non-Riemannian geometry by the official representatives of the contemporary geometry. Class of the Riemannian geometries appears to be too narrow for physical applications. The microcosm physics needs expansion of the class of possible geometries appropriate for the role of space-time geometry. In the framework of the non-Riemannian geometry one can construct the space-time geometry, where the motion of free particles is primordially stochastic, and this stochasticity depends on the particle mass. At the same time the geometry in itself is not stochastic in the sense that the space-time intervals are deterministic. Principles of quantum mechanics can be deduced from such a space-time geometry. The crisis situation in geometry appears to be connected with some preconceptions concerning the foundation of the geometry. The preconceptions as well as the crisis generated by them are not purely scientific phenomena. The human factor (social aspect) is rather strong in the crisis phenomena. The preconceptions and the human factor appear to be so strong, that usual logical arguments are not perceived, and the usual formal mathematical language appears to be inappropriate for perception of an analysis of the crisis origin and of a possibility of its overcoming. In the paper the history and motives of the non-Riemannian geometry construction are presented. There is a hope that such a less formal way of presentation helps to understand and to overcome the existing preconceptions.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2005;
originally announced March 2005.
-
Deformation principle as a foundation of physical geometry
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
Physical geometry studies mutual disposition of geometrical objects and points in space, or space-time, which is described by the distance function $ d$, or by the world function $σ=d^{2}/2$. One suggests a new general method of the physical geometry construction. The proper Euclidean geometry is described in terms of its world function $σ_{\mathrm{E}}$. Any physical geometry $\mathcal{G}$ is ob…
▽ More
Physical geometry studies mutual disposition of geometrical objects and points in space, or space-time, which is described by the distance function $ d$, or by the world function $σ=d^{2}/2$. One suggests a new general method of the physical geometry construction. The proper Euclidean geometry is described in terms of its world function $σ_{\mathrm{E}}$. Any physical geometry $\mathcal{G}$ is obtained from the Euclidean geometry as a result of replacement of the Euclidean world function $σ_{\mathrm{E}}$ by the world function $σ$ of $\mathcal{G}$. This method is very simple and effective. It introduces a new geometric property: nondegeneracy of geometry. Using this method, one can construct deterministic space-time geometries with primordially stochastic motion of free particles and geometrized particle mass. Such a space-time geometry defined properly (with quantum constant as an attribute of geometry) allows one to explain quantum effects as a result of the statistical description of the stochastic particle motion (without a use of quantum principles).
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2004; v1 submitted 8 December, 2003;
originally announced December 2003.
-
Deformation principle and problem of parallelism in geometry and physics
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
The deformation principle admits one to obtain a very broad class of nonuniform geometries as a result of deformation of the proper Euclidean geometry. The Riemannian geometry is also obtained by means of a deformation of the Euclidean geometry. Application of the deformation principle appears to be not consecutive, and the Riemannian geometry appears to be not completely consistent. Two differe…
▽ More
The deformation principle admits one to obtain a very broad class of nonuniform geometries as a result of deformation of the proper Euclidean geometry. The Riemannian geometry is also obtained by means of a deformation of the Euclidean geometry. Application of the deformation principle appears to be not consecutive, and the Riemannian geometry appears to be not completely consistent. Two different definitions of two vectors parallelism are investigated and compared. The first definitions is based on the deformation principle. The second definition is the conventional definition of parallelism, which is used in the Riemannian geometry. It is shown, that the second definition is inconsistent. It leads to absence of absolute parallelism in Riemannian geometry and to discrimination of outcome outside the framework of the Riemannian geometry at description of the space-time geometry.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2003; v1 submitted 27 October, 2002;
originally announced October 2002.
-
Restricted linear properties of scalar product in T-geometry
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
It is shown that scalar product of two vectors can be introduced in any geometry (metric space) independently of possibility of the linear space introduction. In general, linear properties of scalar product are restricted. Domain of linearity increases in homogeneous geometry.
It is shown that scalar product of two vectors can be introduced in any geometry (metric space) independently of possibility of the linear space introduction. In general, linear properties of scalar product are restricted. Domain of linearity increases in homogeneous geometry.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2002; v1 submitted 18 October, 2002;
originally announced October 2002.
-
Geometry without topology as a new conception of geometry
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
A geometric conception is a method of a geometry construction. The Riemannian geometric conception and a new T-geometric one are considered. T-geometry is built only on the basis of information included in the metric (distance between two points). Such geometric concepts as dimension, manifold, metric tensor, curve are fundamental in the Riemannian conception of geometry, and they are derivative…
▽ More
A geometric conception is a method of a geometry construction. The Riemannian geometric conception and a new T-geometric one are considered. T-geometry is built only on the basis of information included in the metric (distance between two points). Such geometric concepts as dimension, manifold, metric tensor, curve are fundamental in the Riemannian conception of geometry, and they are derivative in the T-geometric one. T-geometry is the simplest geometric conception (essentially only finite point sets are investigated) and simultaneously it is the most general one. It is insensitive to the space continuity and has a new property -- nondegeneracy. Fitting the T-geometry metric with the metric tensor of Riemannian geometry, one can compare geometries, constructed on the basis of different conceptions. The comparison shows that along with similarity (the same system of geodesics, the same metric) there is a difference. There is an absolute parallelism in T-geometry, but it is absent in the Riemannian geometry. In T-geometry any space region is isometrically embeddable in the space, whereas in Riemannian geometry only convex region is isometrically embeddable. T-geometric conception appears to be more consistent logically, than the Riemannian one.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2001;
originally announced March 2001.
-
Hamilton Variational Principle for Statistical Ensemble of Deterministic Systems and its Application for Ensemble of Stochastic Systems
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
Hamilton variational principle for special type of statistical ensemble of deterministic dynamical systems is derived. Thie form of variational principle allows one to describe the statistical ensemble in terms of wave functions and provides a basis for a description of statistical ensemble of stochastic systems. It is shown that sometimes such a statistical description of stochastic particle mo…
▽ More
Hamilton variational principle for special type of statistical ensemble of deterministic dynamical systems is derived. Thie form of variational principle allows one to describe the statistical ensemble in terms of wave functions and provides a basis for a description of statistical ensemble of stochastic systems. It is shown that sometimes such a statistical description of stochastic particle motion appears to coincide with the quantum description in terms of Schroedinger equation.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2000;
originally announced November 2000.
-
Geometry without Topology
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
The proper Euclidean geometry is considered to be metric space and described in terms of only metric and finite metric subspaces (sigma-immanent description). Constructing the geometry, one does not use topology and topological properties. For instance, the straight, passing through points A and B, is defined as a set of such points R that the area S(A,B,R) of the triangle ABR vanishes. The tria…
▽ More
The proper Euclidean geometry is considered to be metric space and described in terms of only metric and finite metric subspaces (sigma-immanent description). Constructing the geometry, one does not use topology and topological properties. For instance, the straight, passing through points A and B, is defined as a set of such points R that the area S(A,B,R) of the triangle ABR vanishes. The triangle area is expressed via metric by means of the Hero's formula, and the straight appears to be defined only via metric, i.e. without a reference to (topological) concept of curve. (Usually the straight is defined as the shortest curve, connecting two points A and B). Such a construction of geometry is free from constraints (continuity, dimensionality of space), generated by a use of topology, but not by geometry in itself. At such a description all information on the geometry properties (such as uniformity, isotropy, continuity and degeneracy) is contained in metric. Modifying the metric, one changes the geometry automatically. The Riemannian geometry is constructed by two different ways: (1) by conventional way on the basis of metric tensor, (2) as a result of modification of the metric in the sigma-immanent description of the proper Euclidean geometry. The two obtained geometries are compared. The convexity problem in geometry and the problem of collinerity of vectors at distant points are considered. The nonmetric definition of curve is shown to be a concept of only proper Euclidean geometry. It is inadequate to any non-Euclidean geometry.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2000;
originally announced February 2000.
-
Classification of Finite Subspaces of Metric Space Instead of Constraints on Metrics
Authors:
Yuri A. Rylov
Abstract:
A new method of metric space investigation, based on classification of its finite subspaces, is suggested. It admits to derive information on metric space properties which is encoded in metric. The method describes geometry in terms of only metric. It admits to remove constraints imposed usually on metric (the triangle axiom and nonnegativity of the squared metric), and to use the metric space f…
▽ More
A new method of metric space investigation, based on classification of its finite subspaces, is suggested. It admits to derive information on metric space properties which is encoded in metric. The method describes geometry in terms of only metric. It admits to remove constraints imposed usually on metric (the triangle axiom and nonnegativity of the squared metric), and to use the metric space for description of the space-time and other geometries with indefinite metric. Describing space-time and using this method, one can explain quantum effects as geometric effects, i.e. as space-time properties
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 1999;
originally announced May 1999.
