Investigating molecular transport in the human brain from MRI with physics-informed neural networks
Authors:
Bastian Zapf,
Johannes Haubner,
Miroslav Kuchta,
Geir Ringstad,
Per Kristian Eide,
Kent-Andre Mardal
Abstract:
In recent years, a plethora of methods combining deep neural networks and partial differential equations have been developed. A widely known and popular example are physics-informed neural networks. They solve forward and inverse problems involving partial differential equations in terms of a neural network training problem. We apply physics-informed neural networks as well as the finite element m…
▽ More
In recent years, a plethora of methods combining deep neural networks and partial differential equations have been developed. A widely known and popular example are physics-informed neural networks. They solve forward and inverse problems involving partial differential equations in terms of a neural network training problem. We apply physics-informed neural networks as well as the finite element method to estimate the diffusion coefficient governing the long term, i.e. over days, spread of molecules in the human brain from a novel magnetic resonance imaging technique. Synthetic testcases are created to demonstrate that the standard formulation of the physics-informed neural network faces challenges with noisy measurements in our application. Our numerical results demonstrate that the residual of the partial differential equation after training needs to be small in order to obtain accurate recovery of the diffusion coefficient. To achieve this, we apply several strategies such as tuning the weights and the norms used in the loss function as well as residual based adaptive refinement and exchange of residual training points. We find that the diffusion coefficient estimated with PINNs from magnetic resonance images becomes consistent with results from a finite element based approach when the residuum after training becomes small. The observations presented in this work are an important first step towards solving inverse problems on observations from large cohorts of patients in a semi-automated fashion with physics-informed neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2022; v1 submitted 5 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
Can diffusion alone explain brain-wide distribution of a CSF tracer within 24 hours?
Authors:
Lars Magnus Valnes,
Sebastian K. Mitusch,
Geir Ringstad,
Per Kristian Eide,
Simon W. Funke,
Kent-Andre Mardal
Abstract:
The recently proposed glymphatic system suggests that bulk flow is important for clearing waste from the brain, and as such may underlie the development of e.g. Alzheimer's disease. The glymphatic hypothesis is still controversial and several biomechanical modeling studies at the micro-level have at least partially dismissed the system and its assumptions. In contrast, at the macro-level, there ar…
▽ More
The recently proposed glymphatic system suggests that bulk flow is important for clearing waste from the brain, and as such may underlie the development of e.g. Alzheimer's disease. The glymphatic hypothesis is still controversial and several biomechanical modeling studies at the micro-level have at least partially dismissed the system and its assumptions. In contrast, at the macro-level, there are many experimental findings in support of bulk flow. Here, we will investigate to what extent the CSF tracer distributions seen in novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigations over hours and days are suggestive of bulk flow or diffusion. In order to include the complex geometry of the brain, the heterogeneous CSF flow around the brain, and the transport over the time-scale of days, we employed the methods of partial differential constrained optimization to identify the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) that would correspond best to the MRI findings. We found that the computed ADC in grey and white matter was respectively 23\% and 82\% larger than the ADC estimated with DTI, which suggests that diffusion may not be the only mechanism governing transport.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2019; v1 submitted 12 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
